Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
0789f61373 Cleanup: remove warnings
This assert was producing warning in debug builds because
it was never hit under some circumstances.
2021-11-26 17:32:09 +01:00
602ecbdf9a Geometry Nodes: optimize Set Position node
This implements four optimizations in the Set Position node:
* Check whether the position input is the current position and ignore
  it if it is. This results in a speedup when only the Offset input is used.
* Use multi-threading when copying to computed values to the
  position attribute. All geometry types benefit from this.
* Use devirtualization for the offset and position input. This optimizes
  the common case that they are either single values or computed
  in the fly in a span.
* Write to `Mesh->mvert` directly instead of creating a temporary span.
  This makes setting mesh vertex positions even more efficient.

In my simple benchmark I'm using a White Noise node to offset the
position of 1,000,000 vertices. The speed is `20 ms -> 4.5 ms` in the
multi-threaded case and `32 ms -> 22 ms` in the single-threaded case.
2021-11-26 15:33:35 +01:00
f86331a033 Geometry Nodes: deduplicate virtual array implementations
For some underlying data (e.g. spans) we had two virtual array
implementations. One for the mutable and one for the immutable
case. Now that most code does not deal with the virtual array
implementations directly anymore (since rBrBd4c868da9f97a),
we can get away with sharing one implementation for both cases.
This means that we have to do a `const_cast` in a few places, but
this is an implementation detail that does not leak into "user code"
(only when explicitly casting a `VArrayImpl` to a `VMutableArrayImpl`,
which should happen nowhere).
2021-11-26 14:47:15 +01:00
447378753d BLI: remove special cases for is_span and is_single methods
Those were not implemented consistently and don't really help in practice.
2021-11-25 13:51:23 +01:00
cbe9a87d28 Geometry Nodes: use simpler types when devirtualizing virtual array
The compiler is more likely to optimize away the function call
overhead when the used type is simpler and not virtual.
2021-11-24 17:46:00 +01:00
d4c868da9f Geometry Nodes: refactor virtual array system
Goals of this refactor:
* Simplify creating virtual arrays.
* Simplify passing virtual arrays around.
* Simplify converting between typed and generic virtual arrays.
* Reduce memory allocations.

As a quick reminder, a virtual arrays is a data structure that behaves like an
array (i.e. it can be accessed using an index). However, it may not actually
be stored as array internally. The two most important implementations
of virtual arrays are those that correspond to an actual plain array and those
that have the same value for every index. However, many more
implementations exist for various reasons (interfacing with legacy attributes,
unified iterator over all points in multiple splines, ...).

With this refactor the core types (`VArray`, `GVArray`, `VMutableArray` and
`GVMutableArray`) can be used like "normal values". They typically live
on the stack. Before, they were usually inside a `std::unique_ptr`. This makes
passing them around much easier. Creation of new virtual arrays is also
much simpler now due to some constructors. Memory allocations are
reduced by making use of small object optimization inside the core types.

Previously, `VArray` was a class with virtual methods that had to be overridden
to change the behavior of a the virtual array. Now,`VArray` has a fixed size
and has no virtual methods. Instead it contains a `VArrayImpl` that is
similar to the old `VArray`. `VArrayImpl` should rarely ever be used directly,
unless a new virtual array implementation is added.

To support the small object optimization for many `VArrayImpl` classes,
a new `blender::Any` type is added. It is similar to `std::any` with two
additional features. It has an adjustable inline buffer size and alignment.
The inline buffer size of `std::any` can't be relied on and is usually too
small for our use case here. Furthermore, `blender::Any` can store
additional user-defined type information without increasing the
stack size.

Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12986
2021-11-16 10:16:30 +01:00
4e10b196ac Functions: make copying virtual arrays to span more efficient
Sometimes functions expect a span instead of a virtual array.
If the virtual array is a span internally already, great. But if it is
not (e.g. the position attribute on a mesh), the elements have
to be copied over to a span.

This patch makes the copying process more efficient by giving
the compiler more opportunity for optimization.
2021-04-29 12:59:44 +02:00
5cf6f570c6 Geometry Nodes: use virtual arrays in internal attribute api
A virtual array is a data structure that is similar to a normal array
in that its elements can be accessed by an index. However, a virtual
array does not have to be a contiguous array internally. Instead, its
elements can be layed out arbitrarily while element access happens
through a virtual function call. However, the virtual array data
structures are designed so that the virtual function call can be avoided
in cases where it could become a bottleneck.

Most commonly, a virtual array is backed by an actual array/span or
is a single value internally, that is the same for every index.
Besides those, there are many more specialized virtual arrays like the
ones that provides vertex positions based on the `MVert` struct or
vertex group weights.

Not all attributes used by geometry nodes are stored in simple contiguous
arrays. To provide uniform access to all kinds of attributes, the attribute
API has to provide virtual array functionality that hides the implementation
details of attributes.

Before this refactor, the attribute API provided its own virtual array
implementation as part of the `ReadAttribute` and `WriteAttribute` types.
That resulted in unnecessary code duplication with the virtual array system.
Even worse, it bound many algorithms used by geometry nodes to the specifics
of the attribute API, even though they could also use different data sources
(such as data from sockets, default values, later results of expressions, ...).

This refactor removes the `ReadAttribute` and `WriteAttribute` types and
replaces them with `GVArray` and `GVMutableArray` respectively. The `GV`
stands for "generic virtual". The "generic" means that the data type contained
in those virtual arrays is only known at run-time. There are the corresponding
statically typed types `VArray<T>` and `VMutableArray<T>` as well.

No regressions are expected from this refactor. It does come with one
improvement for users. The attribute API can convert the data type
on write now. This is especially useful when writing to builtin attributes
like `material_index` with e.g. the Attribute Math node (which usually
just writes to float attributes, while `material_index` is an integer attribute).

Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10994
2021-04-17 16:41:39 +02:00
3608891282 Functions: extend virtual array functionality
This adds support for mutable virtual arrays and provides many utilities
for creating virtual arrays for various kinds of data. This commit is
preparation for D10994.
2021-04-17 15:13:20 +02:00
9a2e623372 Cleanup: use BLI_assert_unreachable in some places 2021-03-23 16:49:47 +01:00
bb78f38bd1 Cleanup: single quotes for Python enums, spelling 2021-03-23 16:08:53 +11:00
21268ad20a Functions: devirtualize virtual arrays in simple functions
In some multi-functions (such as a simple add function), the virtual method
call overhead to access array elements adds significant overhead. For these
simple functions it makes sense to generate optimized versions for different
types of virtual arrays. This is done by giving the compiler all the information
it needs to devirtualize virtual arrays.

In my benchmark this speeds up processing a lot of data with small function 2-3x.

This devirtualization should not be done for larger functions, because it increases
compile time and binary size, while providing a negilible performance benefit.
2021-03-22 17:06:27 +01:00
cb521bd37b Cleanup: spelling, expand on comments 2021-03-22 14:48:36 +11:00
4fe8d0419c Functions: refactor virtual array data structures
When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case
that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are
the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such
functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value
for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it
might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs
involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`.
It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods.

Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array
of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used
when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when
building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual
data structures before, but now they are more versatile.

I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of
geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used
independent of the function system.

One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`)
should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain
any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:33:13 +01:00