Orbit inverted on Mac with Magic Mouse #86025

Open
opened 2021-02-26 18:08:08 +01:00 by Michiel van der Wal · 28 comments

System Information
Operating system: Darwin-18.7.0-x86_64-i386-64bit 64 Bits
Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M OpenGL Engine NVIDIA Corporation 4.1 NVIDIA-12.0.24 355.11.10.50.10.103

Blender Version
Broken: version: 2.92.0, branch: master, commit date: 2021-02-24 16:25, hash: 02948a2cab
Worked: 2.91.0

Short description of error
In 2.91, when i moved my fingers on the touch-sensitive Magic Mouse to orbit, it would move in the opposite direction, which is what i, and most likely most Magic Mouse users are used to; however in 2.92.0, the orbit is the same as using a regular scroll wheel. Very disorienting, and there are no settings to invert this navigation, as far as i am aware.

Exact steps for others to reproduce the error
Default Startup > Orbit with Apple Magic Mouse, touch sensitive surface.

**System Information** Operating system: Darwin-18.7.0-x86_64-i386-64bit 64 Bits Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M OpenGL Engine NVIDIA Corporation 4.1 NVIDIA-12.0.24 355.11.10.50.10.103 **Blender Version** Broken: version: 2.92.0, branch: master, commit date: 2021-02-24 16:25, hash: `02948a2cab` Worked: 2.91.0 **Short description of error** In 2.91, when i moved my fingers on the touch-sensitive Magic Mouse to orbit, it would move in the opposite direction, which is what i, and most likely most Magic Mouse users are used to; however in 2.92.0, the orbit is the same as using a regular scroll wheel. Very disorienting, and there are no settings to invert this navigation, as far as i am aware. **Exact steps for others to reproduce the error** Default Startup > Orbit with Apple Magic Mouse, touch sensitive surface.

Added subscriber: @MichielvanderWal

Added subscriber: @MichielvanderWal

#86668 was marked as duplicate of this issue

#86668 was marked as duplicate of this issue

#86434 was marked as duplicate of this issue

#86434 was marked as duplicate of this issue

The current behavior is intentional, it was originally designed that way, see 1dfb6404b7.
Then, after changing the default macOS settings, the intended behavior was broken, and Blender had incorrect default settings, see #71431 #64917.
It was fixed in 055ed335a1.

There is no bug here, I would qualify it as a feature request.

I think there may be a preference for "Invert Orbit", but it should work consistently between the trackpad, mouse, and gizmo.

There is some discussion in 055ed335a1.

The current behavior is intentional, it was originally designed that way, see 1dfb6404b7. Then, after changing the default macOS settings, the intended behavior was broken, and Blender had incorrect default settings, see #71431 #64917. It was fixed in 055ed335a1. There is no bug here, I would qualify it as a feature request. ***I think there may be a preference for "Invert Orbit", but it should work consistently between the trackpad, mouse, and gizmo.*** There is some discussion in 055ed335a1.

Added subscriber: @Fake-User

Added subscriber: @Fake-User

I understand why this was changed, but I strongly disagree with how it has been implemented. When left click select was implemented, Blender didn't get rid of right click selection, it gave the user the option to choose which one they where used to. With the current "fix" everyone who was familiar to the old orbit has been left confused and disoriented. I understand that there has never been a feature to "invert the orbit rotation", but this patch should not have been merged into the master before such a feature was created.

I understand why this was changed, but I strongly disagree with how it has been implemented. When left click select was implemented, Blender didn't get rid of right click selection, it gave the user the option to choose which one they where used to. With the current "fix" everyone who was familiar to the old orbit has been left confused and disoriented. I understand that there has never been a feature to "invert the orbit rotation", but this patch should not have been merged into the master before such a feature was created.
Member

Added subscriber: @Zuko

Added subscriber: @Zuko
Member

Added subscriber: @lichtwerk

Added subscriber: @lichtwerk
Member

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Needs Developer To Reproduce'

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Needs Developer To Reproduce'
Member

@jenkm: I havent followed the whole discussion, but if you say this is working as intended atm, we might as well close this.
If you want to keep this as TODO (adding an option for this), please do so.
Or classify this as Design task.

But from the triaging perspective, there is not much we can do here atm.

@jenkm: I havent followed the whole discussion, but if you say this is working as intended atm, we might as well close this. If you want to keep this as TODO (adding an option for this), please do so. Or classify this as Design task. But from the triaging perspective, there is not much we can do here atm.
Member

note Needs Developer to Reproduce still needs to be renamed to Needs Information from Developer, so this should just indicate that this is in the hands of the module to decide now.

note `Needs Developer to Reproduce` still needs to be renamed to `Needs Information from Developer`, so this should just indicate that this is in the hands of the module to decide now.

Also, the new version has increased the orbital rotation speed. Orbit sensitivity in new and last version is 0.4, but in new version it is more faster.

Also, the new version has increased the orbital rotation speed. Orbit sensitivity in new and last version is 0.4, but in new version it is more faster.

Also, the new version has increased the orbital rotation speed.

Here f7069d71aa was a fix for the trackpad's deltas which were two times smaller than they should be on the retina screen.

> Also, the new version has increased the orbital rotation speed. Here f7069d71aa was a fix for the trackpad's deltas which were two times smaller than they should be on the retina screen.
Member

Added subscriber: @grahamkrenz

Added subscriber: @grahamkrenz

Not to beat a dead horse, but I want to emphasize the impact on my workflow has been large enough that I have reverted to 2.91 to escape the new tracking speed and impossible to invert tracking direction.

This patch should not have been merged. This is not a trivial item, this should not be triaged out.

Not to beat a dead horse, but I want to emphasize the impact on my workflow has been large enough that I have reverted to 2.91 to escape the new tracking speed and impossible to invert tracking direction. This patch should not have been merged. This is not a trivial item, this should not be triaged out.

Added subscriber: @ryanh

Added subscriber: @ryanh

I urge the developers to not disregard this request. Please add the ability to invert orbit direction.

There is likely quite a sizable number of Magic Mouse users who have been encumbered by the change. Even if was always intended that Blender would mirror the system setting (the "natural" scroll toggle), it's a jarring change for Mac users such as myself launching 2.92 for the first time, since I've been trained to scroll counter to what the "natural" direction would be. Expecting users to go to the trouble of toggling off natural scroll in their system preferences whenever they use Blender forfeits an opportunity to make a simple quality of life update for a feature that users otherwise would have expected, since there's a good amount of customization within the navigation preferences already. Aside from Magic Mouse users, one could imagine the number of others who would prefer inverted orbit on certain or all axes.

I urge the developers to not disregard this request. Please add the ability to invert orbit direction. There is likely quite a sizable number of Magic Mouse users who have been encumbered by the change. Even if was always intended that Blender would mirror the system setting (the "natural" scroll toggle), it's a jarring change for Mac users such as myself launching 2.92 for the first time, since I've been trained to scroll counter to what the "natural" direction would be. Expecting users to go to the trouble of toggling off natural scroll in their system preferences whenever they use Blender forfeits an opportunity to make a simple quality of life update for a feature that users otherwise would have expected, since there's a good amount of customization within the navigation preferences already. Aside from Magic Mouse users, one could imagine the number of others who would prefer inverted orbit on certain or all axes.

Thanks Ryan, this does represent an existential threat to my use of Blender, if this change persists I will switch software to avoid switching hardware.

Thanks Ryan, this does represent an existential threat to my use of Blender, if this change persists I will switch software to avoid switching hardware.

Hey everyone! There is currently better place to voice your opinions about this change. This thread is a bug report, but because it is not considered a bug by the developers, it will likely only get glossed over. If you want to have a better chance at getting a toggle, the feature commit is the best place to do it!

https://developer.blender.org/rB055ed335a111bebed7193acd083f54d5c82929ff

If this change has been as much of a headache for you as it has been for me, go over there and make some noise about about.

Hey everyone! There is currently better place to voice your opinions about this change. This thread is a bug report, but because it is not considered a bug by the developers, it will likely only get glossed over. If you want to have a better chance at getting a toggle, the feature commit is the best place to do it! https://developer.blender.org/rB055ed335a111bebed7193acd083f54d5c82929ff If this change has been as much of a headache for you as it has been for me, go over there and make some noise about about.
Member

Added subscribers: @JulianEisel, @ankitm

Added subscribers: @JulianEisel, @ankitm
Member

If this change has been as much of a headache for you as it has been for me, go over there and make some noise about about.

That's bad advice. See the To: and CC section of your emails to see who's listening. Concern is not a replacement for bug report.


@JulianEisel could you change the status of the report please ? @jenkm already expressed his take above.

> If this change has been as much of a headache for you as it has been for me, go over there and make some noise about about. That's bad advice. See the `To:` and `CC` section of your emails to see who's listening. Concern is not a replacement for bug report. ------- @JulianEisel could you change the status of the report please ? @jenkm already expressed his take above.

In #86025#1134260, @ankitm wrote:

If this change has been as much of a headache for you as it has been for me, go over there and make some noise about about.

That's bad advice. See the To: and CC section of your emails to see who's listening. Concern is not a replacement for bug report.


@JulianEisel could you change the status of the report please ? @jenkm already expressed his take above.

I have done both, in the meantime, C4D it is.

> In #86025#1134260, @ankitm wrote: >> If this change has been as much of a headache for you as it has been for me, go over there and make some noise about about. > That's bad advice. See the `To:` and `CC` section of your emails to see who's listening. Concern is not a replacement for bug report. > > ------- > > @JulianEisel could you change the status of the report please ? @jenkm already expressed his take above. I have done both, in the meantime, C4D it is.

Added subscriber: @Ankit-1

Added subscriber: @Ankit-1

@Ankit-1

That's bad advice. See the To: and CC section of your emails to see who's listening. Concern is not a replacement for bug report.

This thread is the bug report. That is why I was sending people over to the commit and away from here :/

@Ankit-1 > That's bad advice. See the `To:` and `CC` section of your emails to see who's listening. Concern is not a replacement for bug report. This thread is the bug report. That is why I was sending people over to the commit and away from here :/

Added subscriber: @ee0pdt

Added subscriber: @ee0pdt

To the devs in the Blender team watching this: What should the affecting Mac community do? Seems there is a potential for a new option to invert orbit, should this bug report be changed to a feature request? Or should we make a new request somewhere?

In the meantime, we're all a bit frustrated and just want to get on with building stuff without having to relearn what was natural to us up to now.

To the devs in the Blender team watching this: What should the affecting Mac community do? Seems there is a potential for a new option to invert orbit, should this bug report be changed to a feature request? Or should we make a new request somewhere? In the meantime, we're all a bit frustrated and just want to get on with building stuff without having to relearn what was natural to us up to now.

Removed subscriber: @Zuko

Removed subscriber: @Zuko

In #86025#1138816, @ee0pdt wrote:
To the devs in the Blender team watching this: What should the affecting Mac community do? Seems there is a potential for a new option to invert orbit, should this bug report be changed to a feature request? Or should we make a new request somewhere?

In the meantime, we're all a bit frustrated and just want to get on with building stuff without having to relearn what was natural to us up to now.

Hi, not a dev but I've reverted to version 2.91 which retains proper mac functionality that we've all gotten used to for the last decade. I would also start learning alternative software, I was able to find copy of 3DS Max and have been skills transferring since this happened.

Can't image using blender professionally if a major interface change for a large percent of users is going to be implemented this way. If this is something you use for work, I recommend you discontinue using Blender as early as you can.

> In #86025#1138816, @ee0pdt wrote: > To the devs in the Blender team watching this: What should the affecting Mac community do? Seems there is a potential for a new option to invert orbit, should this bug report be changed to a feature request? Or should we make a new request somewhere? > > In the meantime, we're all a bit frustrated and just want to get on with building stuff without having to relearn what was natural to us up to now. Hi, not a dev but I've reverted to version 2.91 which retains proper mac functionality that we've all gotten used to for the last decade. I would also start learning alternative software, I was able to find copy of 3DS Max and have been skills transferring since this happened. Can't image using blender professionally if a major interface change for a large percent of users is going to be implemented this way. If this is something you use for work, I recommend you discontinue using Blender as early as you can.
Philipp Oeser removed the
Interest
User Interface
label 2023-02-10 09:23:35 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
11 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#86025
No description provided.