Mesh selection bug (Blender 3.0) #94981

Closed
opened 1 year ago by d-b · 30 comments
d-b commented 1 year ago

System Information
Operating system: Windows-10-10.0.19044-SP0
Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050/PCIe/SSE2

Blender Version
Broken: 3.0.0, branch: master, commit date: 2021-12-02 18:35, hash: f1cca30557, type: release

I select the mesh on the icing object by left clicking mouse, dragging it across the points that I want. (If any mesh below the X & Y axis are included in the selection, then it will also select the mesh on the other side of the icing, below the X & Y axis.) For some reason, when making the selection, it ignores the donut below the icing, as if it's not there. I don't know if this is a normal thing or not.

(Earlier I said it happens with the Solidify Modifier, but that was wrong. I Removed the Solidify Modifier and this still happens. This also happens no matter which way you view it, as long as you select mesh that are below X & Y axis.)

I have attached a video to better explain. I have also attached my .blend file. (I also tried this on version on 2.93.7 and I have the same issue.)


Update: This isn't a bug, but I have made a request to improve mesh selection.
I have created the feature request here: Improved Mesh Selection in Edit Mode
If possible, please leave an upvote on it. Thank you!

Video:
blender_bug2.mp4

Blend File:
donut.blend

**System Information** Operating system: Windows-10-10.0.19044-SP0 Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050/PCIe/SSE2 **Blender Version** Broken: 3.0.0, branch: master, commit date: 2021-12-02 18:35, hash: f1cca3055776, type: release I select the mesh on the icing object by left clicking mouse, dragging it across the points that I want. (If any mesh below the X & Y axis are included in the selection, then it will also select the mesh on the other side of the icing, below the X & Y axis.) For some reason, when making the selection, it ignores the donut below the icing, as if it's not there. I don't know if this is a normal thing or not. (Earlier I said it happens with the Solidify Modifier, but that was wrong. I Removed the Solidify Modifier and this still happens. This also happens no matter which way you view it, as long as you select mesh that are below X & Y axis.) I have attached a video to better explain. I have also attached my .blend file. (I also tried this on version on 2.93.7 and I have the same issue.) ----- **Update:** This isn't a bug, but I have made a request to improve mesh selection. I have created the feature request here: [Improved Mesh Selection in Edit Mode ](https://blender.community/c/rightclickselect/08Kv/) If possible, please leave an upvote on it. Thank you! Video: [blender_bug2.mp4](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F12811739/blender_bug2.mp4) Blend File: [donut.blend](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F12808825/donut.blend)
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

Added subscriber: @d-b

Added subscriber: @d-b
d-b changed title from Mesh selection bug at a certain angle in perspective view (Blender 3.0) to Mesh selection bug when viewing object below X & Y axis in perspective view (Blender 3.0) 1 year ago
d-b changed title from Mesh selection bug when viewing object below X & Y axis in perspective view (Blender 3.0) to Mesh selection bug when viewing object from below X & Y axis in perspective view (Blender 3.0) 1 year ago
iss commented 1 year ago
Collaborator

Closed as duplicate of #94686

Closed as duplicate of #94686
iss closed this issue 1 year ago
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

Added subscriber: @PratikPB2123

Added subscriber: @PratikPB2123
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

Hi, please take a look at this issue, it was closed and marked as a duplicate, which it wasn't. It's an entirely different issue. In the video that I attached, I had proportional editing turned off. In the video, I show that it works correctly at first when the view is above the X & Y axis, but as soon as I change the view that looks from below the X &Y axis, it causes the bug.

Hi, please take a look at this issue, it was closed and marked as a duplicate, which it wasn't. It's an entirely different issue. In the video that I attached, I had proportional editing turned off. In the video, I show that it works correctly at first when the view is above the X & Y axis, but as soon as I change the view that looks from below the X &Y axis, it causes the bug.
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

Added subscriber: @HooglyBoogly

Added subscriber: @HooglyBoogly
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

Added subscriber: @FynnGr

Added subscriber: @FynnGr
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

Added subscriber: @kevindietrich

Added subscriber: @kevindietrich
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

Added subscribers: @mano-wii, @ideasman42

Added subscribers: @mano-wii, @ideasman42
Collaborator

Changed status from 'Duplicate' to: 'Needs Triage'

Changed status from 'Duplicate' to: 'Needs Triage'
HooglyBoogly reopened this issue 1 year ago
Collaborator
Removed subscribers: @kevindietrich, @FynnGr, @HooglyBoogly, @PratikPB2123
Collaborator

Removed subscribers: @ideasman42, @mano-wii

Removed subscribers: @ideasman42, @mano-wii
Collaborator

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Needs User Info'

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Needs User Info'
Collaborator

Hi, thanks for the report. I can reproduce. Did you apply solidify modifier on Donut object?
Problem looks similar to: #82182 (Solidify cause wrong vertex selection in edit mode)

Hi, thanks for the report. I can reproduce. Did you apply solidify modifier on Donut object? Problem looks similar to: #82182 (Solidify cause wrong vertex selection in edit mode)
iss commented 1 year ago
Collaborator

Added subscriber: @iss

Added subscriber: @iss
iss commented 1 year ago
Collaborator

It is same issue though, here you can substitute proportional editing with box select - vertices on the other side are obstructed by donut object, but it is not being edited, therefore box select will get projected through it.

If this is a bug then please specify Blender version where this worked, you can find all previous versions in https://download.blender.org/release/

It is same issue though, here you can substitute proportional editing with box select - vertices on the other side are obstructed by donut object, but it is not being edited, therefore **box select** will get projected through it. If this is a bug then please specify Blender version where this worked, you can find all previous versions in https://download.blender.org/release/
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

Added subscriber: @PratikPB2123

Added subscriber: @PratikPB2123
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

In #94981#1289734, @PratikPB2123 wrote:
Hi, thanks for the report. I can reproduce. Did you apply solidify modifier on Donut object?
Problem looks similar to: #82182 (Solidify cause wrong vertex selection in edit mode)

Yes that seems to be the issue, while this bug happened on the icing object which had the solidify modifier, it did not happen on the donut itself since it didn't have that modifier. However just earlier I tried moving the icing up on the z axis and it worked just fine, so it happens with that modifier to any mesh that is below the x and y axis.

In #94981#1290169, @iss wrote:
It is same issue though, here you can substitute proportional editing with box select - vertices on the other side are obstructed by donut object, but it is not being edited, therefore box select will get projected through it.

If this is a bug then please specify Blender version where this worked, you can find all previous versions in https://download.blender.org/release/

Yes you are right, I guess I just couldn't understand why selecting caused an issue only when it was below the x and y axis. I thought it was specific enough to be a bug. Just now I moved the icing a bit up on the z axis so the bottom half of the icing is not below the x and y axis and the bug doesn't happen that way. It only happens with the solidifier modifier applied (then if any part of the object's mesh is below the x and y axis, it will cause the bug.)

> In #94981#1289734, @PratikPB2123 wrote: > Hi, thanks for the report. I can reproduce. Did you apply solidify modifier on Donut object? > Problem looks similar to: #82182 (Solidify cause wrong vertex selection in edit mode) Yes that seems to be the issue, while this bug happened on the icing object which had the solidify modifier, it did not happen on the donut itself since it didn't have that modifier. However just earlier I tried moving the icing up on the z axis and it worked just fine, so it happens with that modifier to any mesh that is below the x and y axis. > In #94981#1290169, @iss wrote: > It is same issue though, here you can substitute proportional editing with box select - vertices on the other side are obstructed by donut object, but it is not being edited, therefore **box select** will get projected through it. > > If this is a bug then please specify Blender version where this worked, you can find all previous versions in https://download.blender.org/release/ Yes you are right, I guess I just couldn't understand why selecting caused an issue only when it was below the x and y axis. I thought it was specific enough to be a bug. Just now I moved the icing a bit up on the z axis so the bottom half of the icing is not below the x and y axis and the bug doesn't happen that way. It only happens with the solidifier modifier applied (then if any part of the object's mesh is below the x and y axis, it will cause the bug.)
iss commented 1 year ago
Collaborator

Added subscriber: @lichtwerk

Added subscriber: @lichtwerk
iss commented 1 year ago
Collaborator

This is not same issue as #82182 - Geometry of this modifier is not displayed in edit mode. Again, geometry can't be occluded by donut, because it's not in edit mode. When you hide it (it's not seen by Blender in edit mode) you see that it works as expected.

In #94981#1290299, @d-b wrote:
Just now I moved the icing a bit up on the z axis so the bottom half of the icing is not below the x and y axis and the bug doesn't happen that way. It only happens with the solidifier modifier applied (then if any part of the object's mesh is below the x and y axis, it will cause the bug.)

Can't reproduce this really, can you upload this file?

It is possible that I am misunderstanding this report though. @lichtwerk can you double check me on this? There have been 3 nearly identical reports and this feels weird to close them as invalid.

This is not same issue as #82182 - Geometry of this modifier is not displayed in edit mode. Again, geometry can't be occluded by donut, because it's not in edit mode. When you hide it (it's not seen by Blender in edit mode) you see that it works as expected. > In #94981#1290299, @d-b wrote: >Just now I moved the icing a bit up on the z axis so the bottom half of the icing is not below the x and y axis and the bug doesn't happen that way. It only happens with the solidifier modifier applied (then if any part of the object's mesh is below the x and y axis, it will cause the bug.) Can't reproduce this really, can you upload this file? It is possible that I am misunderstanding this report though. @lichtwerk can you double check me on this? There have been 3 nearly identical reports and this feels weird to close them as invalid.
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

This comment was removed by @d-b

*This comment was removed by @d-b*
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

In #94981#1291125, @iss wrote:
This is not same issue as #82182 - Geometry of this modifier is not displayed in edit mode. Again, geometry can't be occluded by donut, because it's not in edit mode. When you hide it (it's not seen by Blender in edit mode) you see that it works as expected.

In #94981#1290299, @d-b wrote:
Just now I moved the icing a bit up on the z axis so the bottom half of the icing is not below the x and y axis and the bug doesn't happen that way. It only happens with the solidifier modifier applied (then if any part of the object's mesh is below the x and y axis, it will cause the bug.)

Can't reproduce this really, can you upload this file?

It is possible that I am misunderstanding this report though. @lichtwerk can you double check me on this? There have been 3 nearly identical reports and this feels weird to close them as invalid.

Nevermind what I said about moving the icing up, that didn't really do anything either.

> In #94981#1291125, @iss wrote: > This is not same issue as #82182 - Geometry of this modifier is not displayed in edit mode. Again, geometry can't be occluded by donut, because it's not in edit mode. When you hide it (it's not seen by Blender in edit mode) you see that it works as expected. > >> In #94981#1290299, @d-b wrote: >>Just now I moved the icing a bit up on the z axis so the bottom half of the icing is not below the x and y axis and the bug doesn't happen that way. It only happens with the solidifier modifier applied (then if any part of the object's mesh is below the x and y axis, it will cause the bug.) > Can't reproduce this really, can you upload this file? > > It is possible that I am misunderstanding this report though. @lichtwerk can you double check me on this? There have been 3 nearly identical reports and this feels weird to close them as invalid. Nevermind what I said about moving the icing up, that didn't really do anything either.
d-b changed title from Mesh selection bug when viewing object from below X & Y axis in perspective view (Blender 3.0) to Mesh selection bug (Blender 3.0) 1 year ago
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

I want to clear things up a bit, earlier I said it happens with the Solidify Modifier, but that was wrong. I Removed the Solidify Modifier and this still happens. This also happens no matter which way you view it, as long as you select mesh that are below X & Y axis, you can test this in the same .blend file, and I have uploaded another video.

I want to clear things up a bit, earlier I said it happens with the Solidify Modifier, but that was wrong. I Removed the Solidify Modifier and this still happens. This also happens no matter which way you view it, as long as you select mesh that are below X & Y axis, you can test this in the same .blend file, and I have uploaded another video.
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

I added a video that shows it working correctly in blender 2.79.
Update: Unfortunately, after playing around with it some more, the same thing happens in 2.79 so no, it does not work there either.

I added a video that shows it working correctly in blender 2.79. **Update:** Unfortunately, after playing around with it some more, the same thing happens in 2.79 so no, it does not work there either.
d-b changed title from Mesh selection bug (Blender 3.0) to Mesh selection bug (Blender 3.0) - Works correctly in 2.79 1 year ago
d-b changed title from Mesh selection bug (Blender 3.0) - Works correctly in 2.79 to Mesh selection bug (Blender 3.0) 1 year ago
Collaborator

The same situation shown in the video also happens in 2.79. So it's not a regression.

What happens is that when selecting in edit mode, Blender does not consider (or see) objects outside edit mode.

So, some things that are occluded for the user are actually not occluded for Blender and so are also selected.


This behavior could change, but this would need to be discussed first and the report would be a request for modified/improved behavior.

For user requests and feedback, we have other channels: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Communication/Contact#User_Feedback_and_Requests


Did I misunderstand the problem?

The same situation shown in the video also happens in 2.79. So it's not a regression. What happens is that when selecting in edit mode, Blender does not consider (or see) objects outside edit mode. So, some things that are occluded for the user are actually not occluded for Blender and so are also selected. --- This behavior could change, but this would need to be discussed first and the report would be a request for modified/improved behavior. For user requests and feedback, we have other channels: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Communication/Contact#User_Feedback_and_Requests --- Did I misunderstand the problem?
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

Added subscriber: @mano-wii

Added subscriber: @mano-wii
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

In #94981#1291335, @mano-wii wrote:
The same situation shown in the video also happens in 2.79. So it's not a regression.

What happens is that when selecting in edit mode, Blender does not consider (or see) objects outside edit mode.

So, some things that are occluded for the user are actually not occluded for Blender and so are also selected.


This behavior could change, but this would need to be discussed first and the report would be a request for modified/improved behavior.

For user requests and feedback, we have other channels: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Communication/Contact#User_Feedback_and_Requests


Did I misunderstand the problem?

You understood it perfectly. Blender doesn't consider other objects which are outside of the edit mode in the current object. I think I misunderstood the problem thinking it was a bug, but it was just a normal thing in blender. I do think that it would be nicer to have this feature implemented. I will try to request it with the link provided, thank you. I'm not sure if it will be added though, I'm sure others might have requested this before me. Thanks anyways!

> In #94981#1291335, @mano-wii wrote: > The same situation shown in the video also happens in 2.79. So it's not a regression. > > What happens is that when selecting in edit mode, Blender does not consider (or see) objects outside edit mode. > > So, some things that are occluded for the user are actually not occluded for Blender and so are also selected. > > --- > This behavior could change, but this would need to be discussed first and the report would be a request for modified/improved behavior. > > For user requests and feedback, we have other channels: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Communication/Contact#User_Feedback_and_Requests > > --- > Did I misunderstand the problem? You understood it perfectly. Blender doesn't consider other objects which are outside of the edit mode in the current object. I think I misunderstood the problem thinking it was a bug, but it was just a normal thing in blender. I do think that it would be nicer to have this feature implemented. I will try to request it with the link provided, thank you. I'm not sure if it will be added though, I'm sure others might have requested this before me. Thanks anyways!
Collaborator

Changed status from 'Needs User Info' to: 'Archived'

Changed status from 'Needs User Info' to: 'Archived'
mano-wii closed this issue 1 year ago
Collaborator

In #94981#1291337, @d-b wrote:
I'm sure others might have requested this before me. Thanks anyways!

This is a good thing as it helps us to define a priority for the feature.

Since the misunderstanding has been cleared up, I am changing the status of the report.
It can still be used for consultation.

> In #94981#1291337, @d-b wrote: > I'm sure others might have requested this before me. Thanks anyways! This is a good thing as it helps us to define a priority for the feature. Since the misunderstanding has been cleared up, I am changing the status of the report. It can still be used for consultation.
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

In #94981#1291348, @mano-wii wrote:

In #94981#1291337, @d-b wrote:
I'm sure others might have requested this before me. Thanks anyways!

This is a good thing as it helps us to define a priority for the feature.

Since the misunderstanding has been cleared up, I am changing the status of the report.
It can still be used for consultation.

Very well, thank you for the help. I will go ahead and make a request for this then.

> In #94981#1291348, @mano-wii wrote: >> In #94981#1291337, @d-b wrote: >> I'm sure others might have requested this before me. Thanks anyways! > > This is a good thing as it helps us to define a priority for the feature. > > Since the misunderstanding has been cleared up, I am changing the status of the report. > It can still be used for consultation. Very well, thank you for the help. I will go ahead and make a request for this then.
d-b commented 1 year ago
Poster

I went ahead and created a feature request, if you guys can upvote it that would be great:
Improved Mesh Selection in Edit Mode

Thanks!

I went ahead and created a feature request, if you guys can upvote it that would be great: [Improved Mesh Selection in Edit Mode ](https://blender.community/c/rightclickselect/08Kv/) Thanks!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest/Alembic
Interest/Animation & Rigging
Interest/Asset Browser
Interest/Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest/Audio
Interest/Automated Testing
Interest/Blender Asset Bundle
Interest/Collada
Interest/Compositing
Interest/Core
Interest/Cycles
Interest/Dependency Graph
Interest/Development Management
Interest/Eevee & Viewport
Interest/Freestyle
Interest/Geometry Nodes
Interest/Grease Pencil
Interest/ID Management
Interest/Images & Movies
Interest/Import/Export
Interest/Line Art
Interest/Masking
Interest/Modeling
Interest/Modifiers
Interest/Motion Tracking
Interest/Nodes & Physics
Interest/Overrides
Interest/Performance
Interest/Performance
Interest/Physics
Interest/Pipeline, Assets & I/O
Interest/Platforms, Builds, Tests & Devices
Interest/Python API
Interest/Render & Cycles
Interest/Render Pipeline
Interest/Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest/Text Editor
Interest/Translations
Interest/Triaging
Interest/Undo
Interest/USD
Interest/User Interface
Interest/UV Editing
Interest/VFX & Video
Interest/Video Sequencer
Interest/Virtual Reality
legacy module/Animation & Rigging
legacy module/Core
legacy module/Development Management
legacy module/Eevee & Viewport
legacy module/Grease Pencil
legacy module/Modeling
legacy module/Nodes & Physics
legacy module/Pipeline, Assets & IO
legacy module/Platforms, Builds, Tests & Devices
legacy module/Python API
legacy module/Rendering & Cycles
legacy module/Sculpt, Paint & Texture
legacy module/Triaging
legacy module/User Interface
legacy module/VFX & Video
legacy project/1.0.0-beta.2
legacy project/Asset Browser (Archived)
legacy project/BF Blender: 2.8
legacy project/BF Blender: After Release
legacy project/BF Blender: Next
legacy project/BF Blender: Regressions
legacy project/BF Blender: Unconfirmed
legacy project/Blender 2.70
legacy project/Code Quest
legacy project/Datablocks and Libraries
legacy project/Eevee
legacy project/Game Animation
legacy project/Game Audio
legacy project/Game Data Conversion
legacy project/Game Engine
legacy project/Game Logic
legacy project/Game Physics
legacy project/Game Python
legacy project/Game Rendering
legacy project/Game UI
legacy project/GPU / Viewport
legacy project/GSoC
legacy project/Infrastructure: Websites
legacy project/LibOverrides - Usability and UX
legacy project/Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
legacy project/Nodes
legacy project/OpenGL Error
legacy project/Papercut
legacy project/Pose Library Basics
legacy project/Retrospective
legacy project/Tracker Curfew
legacy project/Wintab High Frequency
Meta/Good First Issue
Meta/Papercut
migration/requires-manual-verification
Module › Animation & Rigging
Module › Core
Module › Development Management
Module › Eevee & Viewport
Module › Grease Pencil
Module › Modeling
Module › Nodes & Physics
Module › Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module › Platforms, Builds, Tests & Devices
Module › Python API
Module › Render & Cycles
Module › Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module › Triaging
Module › User Interface
Module › VFX & Video
Platform/FreeBSD
Platform/Linux
Platform/macOS
Platform/Windows
Priority › High
Priority › Low
Priority › Normal
Priority › Unbreak Now!
Status › Archived
Status › Confirmed
Status › Duplicate
Status › Needs Information from Developers
Status › Needs Information from User
Status › Needs Triage
Status › Resolved
Type › Bug
Type › Design
Type › Known Issue
Type › Patch
Type › Report
Type › To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#94981
Loading…
There is no content yet.