Nitin-Rawat-1
  • Joined on 2023-02-08
Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to main at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-04-14 11:10:46 +02:00
c61530e9cc Doc: custom job types, bat-pack error, two-way variables (#104202)
Nitin-Rawat-1 commented on pull request studio/flamenco#104195 2023-04-11 17:01:32 +02:00
Check for number of workers before soft failing the task.

@dr.sybren I have written the tests could you review it.

Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to 104190-job-stuck at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-04-10 07:52:19 +02:00
94848c7e05 Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into 104190-job-stuck
0e0fddc076 Add-on: Change 'No Cluster' to 'All'
Compare 2 commits »
Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to main at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-04-10 07:51:49 +02:00
0e0fddc076 Add-on: Change 'No Cluster' to 'All'
Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to 104190-job-stuck at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-04-10 07:51:25 +02:00
1da9c33f22 WorkersLeftToRun should return the UUID of the test worker which is actually failing the task in the test.
Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to 104190-job-stuck at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-04-04 16:02:35 +02:00
e0f1400f4d Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into 104190-job-stuck
b74db1daed Clarify worker clusters in CHANGELOG.md
6a89fa346c Manager: correctly count how many workers can run a job
Compare 3 commits »
Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to main at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-04-04 16:02:05 +02:00
b74db1daed Clarify worker clusters in CHANGELOG.md
6a89fa346c Manager: correctly count how many workers can run a job
Compare 2 commits »
Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to 104190-job-stuck at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-04-04 14:29:53 +02:00
5c101c47fb Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into 104190-job-stuck
a36c4cd4e4 Web: clarify the cluster assignment result in the worker details view
10d7e7e203 Manager: allow creation of worker clusters without UUID
f5ab2bb4c2 OAPI: regenerate code
0e6b6a6013 API: allow worker cluster creation without explicit UUID
Compare 15 commits »
Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to main at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-04-04 14:29:04 +02:00
a36c4cd4e4 Web: clarify the cluster assignment result in the worker details view
10d7e7e203 Manager: allow creation of worker clusters without UUID
f5ab2bb4c2 OAPI: regenerate code
0e6b6a6013 API: allow worker cluster creation without explicit UUID
3724a8874e Slight change of worker cluster behaviour
Compare 14 commits »
Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to 104190-job-stuck at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-04-04 09:24:47 +02:00
ff0a36d19d Add test to check the job failure condition when number of workers available for the job is less than failure threshold.
Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to 104190-job-stuck at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-04-04 08:19:53 +02:00
03533c1e49 Tests for TaskUpdate needs to be updated.
Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to 104190-job-stuck at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-04-04 06:31:58 +02:00
ac88d57ede We should also hard fail the task when numFailed == threshold
ad96e3bb25 Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into 104190-job-stuck
e2559b1181 Cleanup: remove doubly-declared default value in persistence layer
159ce5b34a Manager: avoid starting error messages with 'error'
5ceafb1a9f Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into 104190-job-stuck
Compare 14 commits »
Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to main at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-04-04 04:01:27 +02:00
e2559b1181 Cleanup: remove doubly-declared default value in persistence layer
159ce5b34a Manager: avoid starting error messages with 'error'
Compare 2 commits »
Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to main at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-03-22 04:20:26 +01:00
9bc1d14022 Delete '.arcconfig' (#104199)
Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to main at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-03-21 13:58:59 +01:00
4a142316a1 Add --tag to git describe
996f5da2af Bumped version to 3.3-alpha0
a386d80765 Bump govulncheck dependencies
1b60b43736 Update CHANGELOG
0ac64719e7 Job deleter: improve logging
Compare 7 commits »
Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to 104190-job-stuck at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-03-17 10:43:32 +01:00
6e24e0be3b reviese the conditions for job failure
Nitin-Rawat-1 commented on issue studio/flamenco#104190 2023-03-09 19:24:58 +01:00
Job can get stuck with less workers than soft-fail threshold

If number of workers capable of running the failed task again is "1" that means we have no worker besides the one that actually failed the task. In such condition we should just fail the job itself.

Nitin-Rawat-1 created pull request studio/flamenco#104195 2023-03-09 19:19:27 +01:00
Check for number of workers before soft failing the task.
Nitin-Rawat-1 created branch 104190-job-stuck in Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-03-09 19:15:35 +01:00
Nitin-Rawat-1 pushed to 104190-job-stuck at Nitin-Rawat-1/flamenco 2023-03-09 19:15:35 +01:00
9fdf5aa7c5 Manager: fixed issue #104190 job getting stuck with less workers than soft-failed threshold