This repository has been archived on 2023-10-09. You can view files and clone it, but cannot push or open issues or pull requests.
Files
blender-archive/source/blender/functions/FN_multi_function_params.hh

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

347 lines
12 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
#pragma once
/** \file
* \ingroup fn
*
* This file provides an MFParams and MFParamsBuilder structure.
*
* `MFParamsBuilder` is used by a function caller to be prepare all parameters that are passed into
* the function. `MFParams` is then used inside the called function to access the parameters.
*/
#include <mutex>
#include "BLI_generic_pointer.hh"
#include "BLI_generic_vector_array.hh"
#include "BLI_generic_virtual_vector_array.hh"
#include "BLI_resource_scope.hh"
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
#include "FN_multi_function_signature.hh"
2020-07-03 14:25:20 +02:00
namespace blender::fn {
class MFParamsBuilder {
private:
ResourceScope scope_;
const MFSignature *signature_;
IndexMask mask_;
int64_t min_array_size_;
Geometry Nodes: refactor virtual array system Goals of this refactor: * Simplify creating virtual arrays. * Simplify passing virtual arrays around. * Simplify converting between typed and generic virtual arrays. * Reduce memory allocations. As a quick reminder, a virtual arrays is a data structure that behaves like an array (i.e. it can be accessed using an index). However, it may not actually be stored as array internally. The two most important implementations of virtual arrays are those that correspond to an actual plain array and those that have the same value for every index. However, many more implementations exist for various reasons (interfacing with legacy attributes, unified iterator over all points in multiple splines, ...). With this refactor the core types (`VArray`, `GVArray`, `VMutableArray` and `GVMutableArray`) can be used like "normal values". They typically live on the stack. Before, they were usually inside a `std::unique_ptr`. This makes passing them around much easier. Creation of new virtual arrays is also much simpler now due to some constructors. Memory allocations are reduced by making use of small object optimization inside the core types. Previously, `VArray` was a class with virtual methods that had to be overridden to change the behavior of a the virtual array. Now,`VArray` has a fixed size and has no virtual methods. Instead it contains a `VArrayImpl` that is similar to the old `VArray`. `VArrayImpl` should rarely ever be used directly, unless a new virtual array implementation is added. To support the small object optimization for many `VArrayImpl` classes, a new `blender::Any` type is added. It is similar to `std::any` with two additional features. It has an adjustable inline buffer size and alignment. The inline buffer size of `std::any` can't be relied on and is usually too small for our use case here. Furthermore, `blender::Any` can store additional user-defined type information without increasing the stack size. Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12986
2021-11-16 10:15:51 +01:00
Vector<GVArray> virtual_arrays_;
Vector<GMutableSpan> mutable_spans_;
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
Vector<const GVVectorArray *> virtual_vector_arrays_;
Vector<GVectorArray *> vector_arrays_;
std::mutex mutex_;
Vector<std::pair<int, GMutableSpan>> dummy_output_spans_;
friend class MFParams;
MFParamsBuilder(const MFSignature &signature, const IndexMask mask)
: signature_(&signature), mask_(mask), min_array_size_(mask.min_array_size())
{
}
public:
MFParamsBuilder(const class MultiFunction &fn, int64_t size);
/**
* The indices referenced by the #mask has to live longer than the params builder. This is
* because the it might have to destruct elements for all masked indices in the end.
*/
MFParamsBuilder(const class MultiFunction &fn, const IndexMask *mask);
template<typename T> void add_readonly_single_input_value(T value, StringRef expected_name = "")
{
this->add_readonly_single_input(VArray<T>::ForSingle(std::move(value), min_array_size_),
expected_name);
}
template<typename T> void add_readonly_single_input(const T *value, StringRef expected_name = "")
{
this->add_readonly_single_input(
Geometry Nodes: refactor virtual array system Goals of this refactor: * Simplify creating virtual arrays. * Simplify passing virtual arrays around. * Simplify converting between typed and generic virtual arrays. * Reduce memory allocations. As a quick reminder, a virtual arrays is a data structure that behaves like an array (i.e. it can be accessed using an index). However, it may not actually be stored as array internally. The two most important implementations of virtual arrays are those that correspond to an actual plain array and those that have the same value for every index. However, many more implementations exist for various reasons (interfacing with legacy attributes, unified iterator over all points in multiple splines, ...). With this refactor the core types (`VArray`, `GVArray`, `VMutableArray` and `GVMutableArray`) can be used like "normal values". They typically live on the stack. Before, they were usually inside a `std::unique_ptr`. This makes passing them around much easier. Creation of new virtual arrays is also much simpler now due to some constructors. Memory allocations are reduced by making use of small object optimization inside the core types. Previously, `VArray` was a class with virtual methods that had to be overridden to change the behavior of a the virtual array. Now,`VArray` has a fixed size and has no virtual methods. Instead it contains a `VArrayImpl` that is similar to the old `VArray`. `VArrayImpl` should rarely ever be used directly, unless a new virtual array implementation is added. To support the small object optimization for many `VArrayImpl` classes, a new `blender::Any` type is added. It is similar to `std::any` with two additional features. It has an adjustable inline buffer size and alignment. The inline buffer size of `std::any` can't be relied on and is usually too small for our use case here. Furthermore, `blender::Any` can store additional user-defined type information without increasing the stack size. Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12986
2021-11-16 10:15:51 +01:00
GVArray::ForSingleRef(CPPType::get<T>(), min_array_size_, value), expected_name);
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
}
void add_readonly_single_input(const GSpan span, StringRef expected_name = "")
{
Geometry Nodes: refactor virtual array system Goals of this refactor: * Simplify creating virtual arrays. * Simplify passing virtual arrays around. * Simplify converting between typed and generic virtual arrays. * Reduce memory allocations. As a quick reminder, a virtual arrays is a data structure that behaves like an array (i.e. it can be accessed using an index). However, it may not actually be stored as array internally. The two most important implementations of virtual arrays are those that correspond to an actual plain array and those that have the same value for every index. However, many more implementations exist for various reasons (interfacing with legacy attributes, unified iterator over all points in multiple splines, ...). With this refactor the core types (`VArray`, `GVArray`, `VMutableArray` and `GVMutableArray`) can be used like "normal values". They typically live on the stack. Before, they were usually inside a `std::unique_ptr`. This makes passing them around much easier. Creation of new virtual arrays is also much simpler now due to some constructors. Memory allocations are reduced by making use of small object optimization inside the core types. Previously, `VArray` was a class with virtual methods that had to be overridden to change the behavior of a the virtual array. Now,`VArray` has a fixed size and has no virtual methods. Instead it contains a `VArrayImpl` that is similar to the old `VArray`. `VArrayImpl` should rarely ever be used directly, unless a new virtual array implementation is added. To support the small object optimization for many `VArrayImpl` classes, a new `blender::Any` type is added. It is similar to `std::any` with two additional features. It has an adjustable inline buffer size and alignment. The inline buffer size of `std::any` can't be relied on and is usually too small for our use case here. Furthermore, `blender::Any` can store additional user-defined type information without increasing the stack size. Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12986
2021-11-16 10:15:51 +01:00
this->add_readonly_single_input(GVArray::ForSpan(span), expected_name);
}
void add_readonly_single_input(GPointer value, StringRef expected_name = "")
{
this->add_readonly_single_input(
Geometry Nodes: refactor virtual array system Goals of this refactor: * Simplify creating virtual arrays. * Simplify passing virtual arrays around. * Simplify converting between typed and generic virtual arrays. * Reduce memory allocations. As a quick reminder, a virtual arrays is a data structure that behaves like an array (i.e. it can be accessed using an index). However, it may not actually be stored as array internally. The two most important implementations of virtual arrays are those that correspond to an actual plain array and those that have the same value for every index. However, many more implementations exist for various reasons (interfacing with legacy attributes, unified iterator over all points in multiple splines, ...). With this refactor the core types (`VArray`, `GVArray`, `VMutableArray` and `GVMutableArray`) can be used like "normal values". They typically live on the stack. Before, they were usually inside a `std::unique_ptr`. This makes passing them around much easier. Creation of new virtual arrays is also much simpler now due to some constructors. Memory allocations are reduced by making use of small object optimization inside the core types. Previously, `VArray` was a class with virtual methods that had to be overridden to change the behavior of a the virtual array. Now,`VArray` has a fixed size and has no virtual methods. Instead it contains a `VArrayImpl` that is similar to the old `VArray`. `VArrayImpl` should rarely ever be used directly, unless a new virtual array implementation is added. To support the small object optimization for many `VArrayImpl` classes, a new `blender::Any` type is added. It is similar to `std::any` with two additional features. It has an adjustable inline buffer size and alignment. The inline buffer size of `std::any` can't be relied on and is usually too small for our use case here. Furthermore, `blender::Any` can store additional user-defined type information without increasing the stack size. Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12986
2021-11-16 10:15:51 +01:00
GVArray::ForSingleRef(*value.type(), min_array_size_, value.get()), expected_name);
}
Geometry Nodes: refactor virtual array system Goals of this refactor: * Simplify creating virtual arrays. * Simplify passing virtual arrays around. * Simplify converting between typed and generic virtual arrays. * Reduce memory allocations. As a quick reminder, a virtual arrays is a data structure that behaves like an array (i.e. it can be accessed using an index). However, it may not actually be stored as array internally. The two most important implementations of virtual arrays are those that correspond to an actual plain array and those that have the same value for every index. However, many more implementations exist for various reasons (interfacing with legacy attributes, unified iterator over all points in multiple splines, ...). With this refactor the core types (`VArray`, `GVArray`, `VMutableArray` and `GVMutableArray`) can be used like "normal values". They typically live on the stack. Before, they were usually inside a `std::unique_ptr`. This makes passing them around much easier. Creation of new virtual arrays is also much simpler now due to some constructors. Memory allocations are reduced by making use of small object optimization inside the core types. Previously, `VArray` was a class with virtual methods that had to be overridden to change the behavior of a the virtual array. Now,`VArray` has a fixed size and has no virtual methods. Instead it contains a `VArrayImpl` that is similar to the old `VArray`. `VArrayImpl` should rarely ever be used directly, unless a new virtual array implementation is added. To support the small object optimization for many `VArrayImpl` classes, a new `blender::Any` type is added. It is similar to `std::any` with two additional features. It has an adjustable inline buffer size and alignment. The inline buffer size of `std::any` can't be relied on and is usually too small for our use case here. Furthermore, `blender::Any` can store additional user-defined type information without increasing the stack size. Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12986
2021-11-16 10:15:51 +01:00
void add_readonly_single_input(GVArray varray, StringRef expected_name = "")
{
Geometry Nodes: refactor virtual array system Goals of this refactor: * Simplify creating virtual arrays. * Simplify passing virtual arrays around. * Simplify converting between typed and generic virtual arrays. * Reduce memory allocations. As a quick reminder, a virtual arrays is a data structure that behaves like an array (i.e. it can be accessed using an index). However, it may not actually be stored as array internally. The two most important implementations of virtual arrays are those that correspond to an actual plain array and those that have the same value for every index. However, many more implementations exist for various reasons (interfacing with legacy attributes, unified iterator over all points in multiple splines, ...). With this refactor the core types (`VArray`, `GVArray`, `VMutableArray` and `GVMutableArray`) can be used like "normal values". They typically live on the stack. Before, they were usually inside a `std::unique_ptr`. This makes passing them around much easier. Creation of new virtual arrays is also much simpler now due to some constructors. Memory allocations are reduced by making use of small object optimization inside the core types. Previously, `VArray` was a class with virtual methods that had to be overridden to change the behavior of a the virtual array. Now,`VArray` has a fixed size and has no virtual methods. Instead it contains a `VArrayImpl` that is similar to the old `VArray`. `VArrayImpl` should rarely ever be used directly, unless a new virtual array implementation is added. To support the small object optimization for many `VArrayImpl` classes, a new `blender::Any` type is added. It is similar to `std::any` with two additional features. It has an adjustable inline buffer size and alignment. The inline buffer size of `std::any` can't be relied on and is usually too small for our use case here. Furthermore, `blender::Any` can store additional user-defined type information without increasing the stack size. Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12986
2021-11-16 10:15:51 +01:00
this->assert_current_param_type(MFParamType::ForSingleInput(varray.type()), expected_name);
BLI_assert(varray.size() >= min_array_size_);
virtual_arrays_.append(varray);
}
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
void add_readonly_vector_input(const GVectorArray &vector_array, StringRef expected_name = "")
{
this->add_readonly_vector_input(scope_.construct<GVVectorArray_For_GVectorArray>(vector_array),
expected_name);
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
}
void add_readonly_vector_input(const GSpan single_vector, StringRef expected_name = "")
{
this->add_readonly_vector_input(
scope_.construct<GVVectorArray_For_SingleGSpan>(single_vector, min_array_size_),
expected_name);
}
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
void add_readonly_vector_input(const GVVectorArray &ref, StringRef expected_name = "")
{
this->assert_current_param_type(MFParamType::ForVectorInput(ref.type()), expected_name);
BLI_assert(ref.size() >= min_array_size_);
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
virtual_vector_arrays_.append(&ref);
}
template<typename T> void add_uninitialized_single_output(T *value, StringRef expected_name = "")
{
this->add_uninitialized_single_output(GMutableSpan(CPPType::get<T>(), value, 1),
expected_name);
}
void add_uninitialized_single_output(GMutableSpan ref, StringRef expected_name = "")
{
this->assert_current_param_type(MFParamType::ForSingleOutput(ref.type()), expected_name);
BLI_assert(ref.size() >= min_array_size_);
mutable_spans_.append(ref);
}
void add_ignored_single_output(StringRef expected_name = "")
{
this->assert_current_param_name(expected_name);
const int param_index = this->current_param_index();
const MFParamType &param_type = signature_->param_types[param_index];
Geometry Nodes: refactor array devirtualization Goals: * Better high level control over where devirtualization occurs. There is always a trade-off between performance and compile-time/binary-size. * Simplify using array devirtualization. * Better performance for cases where devirtualization wasn't used before. Many geometry nodes accept fields as inputs. Internally, that means that the execution functions have to accept so called "virtual arrays" as inputs. Those can be e.g. actual arrays, just single values, or lazily computed arrays. Due to these different possible virtual arrays implementations, access to individual elements is slower than it would be if everything was just a normal array (access does through a virtual function call). For more complex execution functions, this overhead does not matter, but for small functions (like a simple addition) it very much does. The virtual function call also prevents the compiler from doing some optimizations (e.g. loop unrolling and inserting simd instructions). The solution is to "devirtualize" the virtual arrays for small functions where the overhead is measurable. Essentially, the function is generated many times with different array types as input. Then there is a run-time dispatch that calls the best implementation. We have been doing devirtualization in e.g. math nodes for a long time already. This patch just generalizes the concept and makes it easier to control. It also makes it easier to investigate the different trade-offs when it comes to devirtualization. Nodes that we've optimized using devirtualization before didn't get a speedup. However, a couple of nodes are using devirtualization now, that didn't before. Those got a 2-4x speedup in common cases. * Map Range * Random Value * Switch * Combine XYZ Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14628
2022-04-26 17:12:34 +02:00
BLI_assert(param_type.category() == MFParamCategory::SingleOutput);
const CPPType &type = param_type.data_type().single_type();
/* An empty span indicates that this is ignored. */
const GMutableSpan dummy_span{type};
mutable_spans_.append(dummy_span);
}
void add_vector_output(GVectorArray &vector_array, StringRef expected_name = "")
{
this->assert_current_param_type(MFParamType::ForVectorOutput(vector_array.type()),
expected_name);
BLI_assert(vector_array.size() >= min_array_size_);
vector_arrays_.append(&vector_array);
}
void add_single_mutable(GMutableSpan ref, StringRef expected_name = "")
{
this->assert_current_param_type(MFParamType::ForMutableSingle(ref.type()), expected_name);
BLI_assert(ref.size() >= min_array_size_);
mutable_spans_.append(ref);
}
void add_vector_mutable(GVectorArray &vector_array, StringRef expected_name = "")
{
this->assert_current_param_type(MFParamType::ForMutableVector(vector_array.type()),
expected_name);
BLI_assert(vector_array.size() >= min_array_size_);
vector_arrays_.append(&vector_array);
}
GMutableSpan computed_array(int param_index)
{
BLI_assert(ELEM(signature_->param_types[param_index].category(),
Geometry Nodes: refactor array devirtualization Goals: * Better high level control over where devirtualization occurs. There is always a trade-off between performance and compile-time/binary-size. * Simplify using array devirtualization. * Better performance for cases where devirtualization wasn't used before. Many geometry nodes accept fields as inputs. Internally, that means that the execution functions have to accept so called "virtual arrays" as inputs. Those can be e.g. actual arrays, just single values, or lazily computed arrays. Due to these different possible virtual arrays implementations, access to individual elements is slower than it would be if everything was just a normal array (access does through a virtual function call). For more complex execution functions, this overhead does not matter, but for small functions (like a simple addition) it very much does. The virtual function call also prevents the compiler from doing some optimizations (e.g. loop unrolling and inserting simd instructions). The solution is to "devirtualize" the virtual arrays for small functions where the overhead is measurable. Essentially, the function is generated many times with different array types as input. Then there is a run-time dispatch that calls the best implementation. We have been doing devirtualization in e.g. math nodes for a long time already. This patch just generalizes the concept and makes it easier to control. It also makes it easier to investigate the different trade-offs when it comes to devirtualization. Nodes that we've optimized using devirtualization before didn't get a speedup. However, a couple of nodes are using devirtualization now, that didn't before. Those got a 2-4x speedup in common cases. * Map Range * Random Value * Switch * Combine XYZ Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14628
2022-04-26 17:12:34 +02:00
MFParamCategory::SingleOutput,
MFParamCategory::SingleMutable));
int data_index = signature_->data_index(param_index);
return mutable_spans_[data_index];
}
GVectorArray &computed_vector_array(int param_index)
{
BLI_assert(ELEM(signature_->param_types[param_index].category(),
Geometry Nodes: refactor array devirtualization Goals: * Better high level control over where devirtualization occurs. There is always a trade-off between performance and compile-time/binary-size. * Simplify using array devirtualization. * Better performance for cases where devirtualization wasn't used before. Many geometry nodes accept fields as inputs. Internally, that means that the execution functions have to accept so called "virtual arrays" as inputs. Those can be e.g. actual arrays, just single values, or lazily computed arrays. Due to these different possible virtual arrays implementations, access to individual elements is slower than it would be if everything was just a normal array (access does through a virtual function call). For more complex execution functions, this overhead does not matter, but for small functions (like a simple addition) it very much does. The virtual function call also prevents the compiler from doing some optimizations (e.g. loop unrolling and inserting simd instructions). The solution is to "devirtualize" the virtual arrays for small functions where the overhead is measurable. Essentially, the function is generated many times with different array types as input. Then there is a run-time dispatch that calls the best implementation. We have been doing devirtualization in e.g. math nodes for a long time already. This patch just generalizes the concept and makes it easier to control. It also makes it easier to investigate the different trade-offs when it comes to devirtualization. Nodes that we've optimized using devirtualization before didn't get a speedup. However, a couple of nodes are using devirtualization now, that didn't before. Those got a 2-4x speedup in common cases. * Map Range * Random Value * Switch * Combine XYZ Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14628
2022-04-26 17:12:34 +02:00
MFParamCategory::VectorOutput,
MFParamCategory::VectorMutable));
int data_index = signature_->data_index(param_index);
return *vector_arrays_[data_index];
}
ResourceScope &resource_scope()
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
{
return scope_;
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
}
private:
void assert_current_param_type(MFParamType param_type, StringRef expected_name = "")
{
UNUSED_VARS_NDEBUG(param_type, expected_name);
#ifdef DEBUG
int param_index = this->current_param_index();
if (expected_name != "") {
StringRef actual_name = signature_->param_names[param_index];
BLI_assert(actual_name == expected_name);
}
MFParamType expected_type = signature_->param_types[param_index];
BLI_assert(expected_type == param_type);
#endif
}
void assert_current_param_name(StringRef expected_name)
{
UNUSED_VARS_NDEBUG(expected_name);
#ifdef DEBUG
if (expected_name.is_empty()) {
return;
}
const int param_index = this->current_param_index();
StringRef actual_name = signature_->param_names[param_index];
BLI_assert(actual_name == expected_name);
#endif
}
int current_param_index() const
{
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
return virtual_arrays_.size() + mutable_spans_.size() + virtual_vector_arrays_.size() +
vector_arrays_.size();
}
};
class MFParams {
private:
MFParamsBuilder *builder_;
public:
MFParams(MFParamsBuilder &builder) : builder_(&builder)
{
}
Geometry Nodes: refactor virtual array system Goals of this refactor: * Simplify creating virtual arrays. * Simplify passing virtual arrays around. * Simplify converting between typed and generic virtual arrays. * Reduce memory allocations. As a quick reminder, a virtual arrays is a data structure that behaves like an array (i.e. it can be accessed using an index). However, it may not actually be stored as array internally. The two most important implementations of virtual arrays are those that correspond to an actual plain array and those that have the same value for every index. However, many more implementations exist for various reasons (interfacing with legacy attributes, unified iterator over all points in multiple splines, ...). With this refactor the core types (`VArray`, `GVArray`, `VMutableArray` and `GVMutableArray`) can be used like "normal values". They typically live on the stack. Before, they were usually inside a `std::unique_ptr`. This makes passing them around much easier. Creation of new virtual arrays is also much simpler now due to some constructors. Memory allocations are reduced by making use of small object optimization inside the core types. Previously, `VArray` was a class with virtual methods that had to be overridden to change the behavior of a the virtual array. Now,`VArray` has a fixed size and has no virtual methods. Instead it contains a `VArrayImpl` that is similar to the old `VArray`. `VArrayImpl` should rarely ever be used directly, unless a new virtual array implementation is added. To support the small object optimization for many `VArrayImpl` classes, a new `blender::Any` type is added. It is similar to `std::any` with two additional features. It has an adjustable inline buffer size and alignment. The inline buffer size of `std::any` can't be relied on and is usually too small for our use case here. Furthermore, `blender::Any` can store additional user-defined type information without increasing the stack size. Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12986
2021-11-16 10:15:51 +01:00
template<typename T> VArray<T> readonly_single_input(int param_index, StringRef name = "")
{
Geometry Nodes: refactor virtual array system Goals of this refactor: * Simplify creating virtual arrays. * Simplify passing virtual arrays around. * Simplify converting between typed and generic virtual arrays. * Reduce memory allocations. As a quick reminder, a virtual arrays is a data structure that behaves like an array (i.e. it can be accessed using an index). However, it may not actually be stored as array internally. The two most important implementations of virtual arrays are those that correspond to an actual plain array and those that have the same value for every index. However, many more implementations exist for various reasons (interfacing with legacy attributes, unified iterator over all points in multiple splines, ...). With this refactor the core types (`VArray`, `GVArray`, `VMutableArray` and `GVMutableArray`) can be used like "normal values". They typically live on the stack. Before, they were usually inside a `std::unique_ptr`. This makes passing them around much easier. Creation of new virtual arrays is also much simpler now due to some constructors. Memory allocations are reduced by making use of small object optimization inside the core types. Previously, `VArray` was a class with virtual methods that had to be overridden to change the behavior of a the virtual array. Now,`VArray` has a fixed size and has no virtual methods. Instead it contains a `VArrayImpl` that is similar to the old `VArray`. `VArrayImpl` should rarely ever be used directly, unless a new virtual array implementation is added. To support the small object optimization for many `VArrayImpl` classes, a new `blender::Any` type is added. It is similar to `std::any` with two additional features. It has an adjustable inline buffer size and alignment. The inline buffer size of `std::any` can't be relied on and is usually too small for our use case here. Furthermore, `blender::Any` can store additional user-defined type information without increasing the stack size. Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12986
2021-11-16 10:15:51 +01:00
const GVArray &varray = this->readonly_single_input(param_index, name);
return varray.typed<T>();
}
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
const GVArray &readonly_single_input(int param_index, StringRef name = "")
{
Geometry Nodes: refactor array devirtualization Goals: * Better high level control over where devirtualization occurs. There is always a trade-off between performance and compile-time/binary-size. * Simplify using array devirtualization. * Better performance for cases where devirtualization wasn't used before. Many geometry nodes accept fields as inputs. Internally, that means that the execution functions have to accept so called "virtual arrays" as inputs. Those can be e.g. actual arrays, just single values, or lazily computed arrays. Due to these different possible virtual arrays implementations, access to individual elements is slower than it would be if everything was just a normal array (access does through a virtual function call). For more complex execution functions, this overhead does not matter, but for small functions (like a simple addition) it very much does. The virtual function call also prevents the compiler from doing some optimizations (e.g. loop unrolling and inserting simd instructions). The solution is to "devirtualize" the virtual arrays for small functions where the overhead is measurable. Essentially, the function is generated many times with different array types as input. Then there is a run-time dispatch that calls the best implementation. We have been doing devirtualization in e.g. math nodes for a long time already. This patch just generalizes the concept and makes it easier to control. It also makes it easier to investigate the different trade-offs when it comes to devirtualization. Nodes that we've optimized using devirtualization before didn't get a speedup. However, a couple of nodes are using devirtualization now, that didn't before. Those got a 2-4x speedup in common cases. * Map Range * Random Value * Switch * Combine XYZ Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14628
2022-04-26 17:12:34 +02:00
this->assert_correct_param(param_index, name, MFParamCategory::SingleInput);
int data_index = builder_->signature_->data_index(param_index);
Geometry Nodes: refactor virtual array system Goals of this refactor: * Simplify creating virtual arrays. * Simplify passing virtual arrays around. * Simplify converting between typed and generic virtual arrays. * Reduce memory allocations. As a quick reminder, a virtual arrays is a data structure that behaves like an array (i.e. it can be accessed using an index). However, it may not actually be stored as array internally. The two most important implementations of virtual arrays are those that correspond to an actual plain array and those that have the same value for every index. However, many more implementations exist for various reasons (interfacing with legacy attributes, unified iterator over all points in multiple splines, ...). With this refactor the core types (`VArray`, `GVArray`, `VMutableArray` and `GVMutableArray`) can be used like "normal values". They typically live on the stack. Before, they were usually inside a `std::unique_ptr`. This makes passing them around much easier. Creation of new virtual arrays is also much simpler now due to some constructors. Memory allocations are reduced by making use of small object optimization inside the core types. Previously, `VArray` was a class with virtual methods that had to be overridden to change the behavior of a the virtual array. Now,`VArray` has a fixed size and has no virtual methods. Instead it contains a `VArrayImpl` that is similar to the old `VArray`. `VArrayImpl` should rarely ever be used directly, unless a new virtual array implementation is added. To support the small object optimization for many `VArrayImpl` classes, a new `blender::Any` type is added. It is similar to `std::any` with two additional features. It has an adjustable inline buffer size and alignment. The inline buffer size of `std::any` can't be relied on and is usually too small for our use case here. Furthermore, `blender::Any` can store additional user-defined type information without increasing the stack size. Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12986
2021-11-16 10:15:51 +01:00
return builder_->virtual_arrays_[data_index];
}
/**
* \return True when the caller provided a buffer for this output parameter. This allows the
* called multi-function to skip some computation. It is still valid to call
* #uninitialized_single_output when this returns false. In this case a new temporary buffer is
* allocated.
*/
bool single_output_is_required(int param_index, StringRef name = "")
{
Geometry Nodes: refactor array devirtualization Goals: * Better high level control over where devirtualization occurs. There is always a trade-off between performance and compile-time/binary-size. * Simplify using array devirtualization. * Better performance for cases where devirtualization wasn't used before. Many geometry nodes accept fields as inputs. Internally, that means that the execution functions have to accept so called "virtual arrays" as inputs. Those can be e.g. actual arrays, just single values, or lazily computed arrays. Due to these different possible virtual arrays implementations, access to individual elements is slower than it would be if everything was just a normal array (access does through a virtual function call). For more complex execution functions, this overhead does not matter, but for small functions (like a simple addition) it very much does. The virtual function call also prevents the compiler from doing some optimizations (e.g. loop unrolling and inserting simd instructions). The solution is to "devirtualize" the virtual arrays for small functions where the overhead is measurable. Essentially, the function is generated many times with different array types as input. Then there is a run-time dispatch that calls the best implementation. We have been doing devirtualization in e.g. math nodes for a long time already. This patch just generalizes the concept and makes it easier to control. It also makes it easier to investigate the different trade-offs when it comes to devirtualization. Nodes that we've optimized using devirtualization before didn't get a speedup. However, a couple of nodes are using devirtualization now, that didn't before. Those got a 2-4x speedup in common cases. * Map Range * Random Value * Switch * Combine XYZ Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14628
2022-04-26 17:12:34 +02:00
this->assert_correct_param(param_index, name, MFParamCategory::SingleOutput);
int data_index = builder_->signature_->data_index(param_index);
return !builder_->mutable_spans_[data_index].is_empty();
}
template<typename T>
MutableSpan<T> uninitialized_single_output(int param_index, StringRef name = "")
{
return this->uninitialized_single_output(param_index, name).typed<T>();
}
GMutableSpan uninitialized_single_output(int param_index, StringRef name = "")
{
Geometry Nodes: refactor array devirtualization Goals: * Better high level control over where devirtualization occurs. There is always a trade-off between performance and compile-time/binary-size. * Simplify using array devirtualization. * Better performance for cases where devirtualization wasn't used before. Many geometry nodes accept fields as inputs. Internally, that means that the execution functions have to accept so called "virtual arrays" as inputs. Those can be e.g. actual arrays, just single values, or lazily computed arrays. Due to these different possible virtual arrays implementations, access to individual elements is slower than it would be if everything was just a normal array (access does through a virtual function call). For more complex execution functions, this overhead does not matter, but for small functions (like a simple addition) it very much does. The virtual function call also prevents the compiler from doing some optimizations (e.g. loop unrolling and inserting simd instructions). The solution is to "devirtualize" the virtual arrays for small functions where the overhead is measurable. Essentially, the function is generated many times with different array types as input. Then there is a run-time dispatch that calls the best implementation. We have been doing devirtualization in e.g. math nodes for a long time already. This patch just generalizes the concept and makes it easier to control. It also makes it easier to investigate the different trade-offs when it comes to devirtualization. Nodes that we've optimized using devirtualization before didn't get a speedup. However, a couple of nodes are using devirtualization now, that didn't before. Those got a 2-4x speedup in common cases. * Map Range * Random Value * Switch * Combine XYZ Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14628
2022-04-26 17:12:34 +02:00
this->assert_correct_param(param_index, name, MFParamCategory::SingleOutput);
int data_index = builder_->signature_->data_index(param_index);
GMutableSpan span = builder_->mutable_spans_[data_index];
if (!span.is_empty()) {
return span;
}
/* The output is ignored by the caller, but the multi-function does not handle this case. So
* create a temporary buffer that the multi-function can write to. */
return this->ensure_dummy_single_output(data_index);
}
/**
* Same as #uninitialized_single_output, but returns an empty span when the output is not
* required.
*/
template<typename T>
MutableSpan<T> uninitialized_single_output_if_required(int param_index, StringRef name = "")
{
return this->uninitialized_single_output_if_required(param_index, name).typed<T>();
}
GMutableSpan uninitialized_single_output_if_required(int param_index, StringRef name = "")
{
Geometry Nodes: refactor array devirtualization Goals: * Better high level control over where devirtualization occurs. There is always a trade-off between performance and compile-time/binary-size. * Simplify using array devirtualization. * Better performance for cases where devirtualization wasn't used before. Many geometry nodes accept fields as inputs. Internally, that means that the execution functions have to accept so called "virtual arrays" as inputs. Those can be e.g. actual arrays, just single values, or lazily computed arrays. Due to these different possible virtual arrays implementations, access to individual elements is slower than it would be if everything was just a normal array (access does through a virtual function call). For more complex execution functions, this overhead does not matter, but for small functions (like a simple addition) it very much does. The virtual function call also prevents the compiler from doing some optimizations (e.g. loop unrolling and inserting simd instructions). The solution is to "devirtualize" the virtual arrays for small functions where the overhead is measurable. Essentially, the function is generated many times with different array types as input. Then there is a run-time dispatch that calls the best implementation. We have been doing devirtualization in e.g. math nodes for a long time already. This patch just generalizes the concept and makes it easier to control. It also makes it easier to investigate the different trade-offs when it comes to devirtualization. Nodes that we've optimized using devirtualization before didn't get a speedup. However, a couple of nodes are using devirtualization now, that didn't before. Those got a 2-4x speedup in common cases. * Map Range * Random Value * Switch * Combine XYZ Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14628
2022-04-26 17:12:34 +02:00
this->assert_correct_param(param_index, name, MFParamCategory::SingleOutput);
int data_index = builder_->signature_->data_index(param_index);
return builder_->mutable_spans_[data_index];
}
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
template<typename T>
const VVectorArray<T> &readonly_vector_input(int param_index, StringRef name = "")
{
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
const GVVectorArray &vector_array = this->readonly_vector_input(param_index, name);
return builder_->scope_.construct<VVectorArray_For_GVVectorArray<T>>(vector_array);
}
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
const GVVectorArray &readonly_vector_input(int param_index, StringRef name = "")
{
Geometry Nodes: refactor array devirtualization Goals: * Better high level control over where devirtualization occurs. There is always a trade-off between performance and compile-time/binary-size. * Simplify using array devirtualization. * Better performance for cases where devirtualization wasn't used before. Many geometry nodes accept fields as inputs. Internally, that means that the execution functions have to accept so called "virtual arrays" as inputs. Those can be e.g. actual arrays, just single values, or lazily computed arrays. Due to these different possible virtual arrays implementations, access to individual elements is slower than it would be if everything was just a normal array (access does through a virtual function call). For more complex execution functions, this overhead does not matter, but for small functions (like a simple addition) it very much does. The virtual function call also prevents the compiler from doing some optimizations (e.g. loop unrolling and inserting simd instructions). The solution is to "devirtualize" the virtual arrays for small functions where the overhead is measurable. Essentially, the function is generated many times with different array types as input. Then there is a run-time dispatch that calls the best implementation. We have been doing devirtualization in e.g. math nodes for a long time already. This patch just generalizes the concept and makes it easier to control. It also makes it easier to investigate the different trade-offs when it comes to devirtualization. Nodes that we've optimized using devirtualization before didn't get a speedup. However, a couple of nodes are using devirtualization now, that didn't before. Those got a 2-4x speedup in common cases. * Map Range * Random Value * Switch * Combine XYZ Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14628
2022-04-26 17:12:34 +02:00
this->assert_correct_param(param_index, name, MFParamCategory::VectorInput);
int data_index = builder_->signature_->data_index(param_index);
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
return *builder_->virtual_vector_arrays_[data_index];
}
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
template<typename T>
GVectorArray_TypedMutableRef<T> vector_output(int param_index, StringRef name = "")
{
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
return {this->vector_output(param_index, name)};
}
GVectorArray &vector_output(int param_index, StringRef name = "")
{
Geometry Nodes: refactor array devirtualization Goals: * Better high level control over where devirtualization occurs. There is always a trade-off between performance and compile-time/binary-size. * Simplify using array devirtualization. * Better performance for cases where devirtualization wasn't used before. Many geometry nodes accept fields as inputs. Internally, that means that the execution functions have to accept so called "virtual arrays" as inputs. Those can be e.g. actual arrays, just single values, or lazily computed arrays. Due to these different possible virtual arrays implementations, access to individual elements is slower than it would be if everything was just a normal array (access does through a virtual function call). For more complex execution functions, this overhead does not matter, but for small functions (like a simple addition) it very much does. The virtual function call also prevents the compiler from doing some optimizations (e.g. loop unrolling and inserting simd instructions). The solution is to "devirtualize" the virtual arrays for small functions where the overhead is measurable. Essentially, the function is generated many times with different array types as input. Then there is a run-time dispatch that calls the best implementation. We have been doing devirtualization in e.g. math nodes for a long time already. This patch just generalizes the concept and makes it easier to control. It also makes it easier to investigate the different trade-offs when it comes to devirtualization. Nodes that we've optimized using devirtualization before didn't get a speedup. However, a couple of nodes are using devirtualization now, that didn't before. Those got a 2-4x speedup in common cases. * Map Range * Random Value * Switch * Combine XYZ Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14628
2022-04-26 17:12:34 +02:00
this->assert_correct_param(param_index, name, MFParamCategory::VectorOutput);
int data_index = builder_->signature_->data_index(param_index);
return *builder_->vector_arrays_[data_index];
}
template<typename T> MutableSpan<T> single_mutable(int param_index, StringRef name = "")
{
return this->single_mutable(param_index, name).typed<T>();
}
GMutableSpan single_mutable(int param_index, StringRef name = "")
{
Geometry Nodes: refactor array devirtualization Goals: * Better high level control over where devirtualization occurs. There is always a trade-off between performance and compile-time/binary-size. * Simplify using array devirtualization. * Better performance for cases where devirtualization wasn't used before. Many geometry nodes accept fields as inputs. Internally, that means that the execution functions have to accept so called "virtual arrays" as inputs. Those can be e.g. actual arrays, just single values, or lazily computed arrays. Due to these different possible virtual arrays implementations, access to individual elements is slower than it would be if everything was just a normal array (access does through a virtual function call). For more complex execution functions, this overhead does not matter, but for small functions (like a simple addition) it very much does. The virtual function call also prevents the compiler from doing some optimizations (e.g. loop unrolling and inserting simd instructions). The solution is to "devirtualize" the virtual arrays for small functions where the overhead is measurable. Essentially, the function is generated many times with different array types as input. Then there is a run-time dispatch that calls the best implementation. We have been doing devirtualization in e.g. math nodes for a long time already. This patch just generalizes the concept and makes it easier to control. It also makes it easier to investigate the different trade-offs when it comes to devirtualization. Nodes that we've optimized using devirtualization before didn't get a speedup. However, a couple of nodes are using devirtualization now, that didn't before. Those got a 2-4x speedup in common cases. * Map Range * Random Value * Switch * Combine XYZ Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14628
2022-04-26 17:12:34 +02:00
this->assert_correct_param(param_index, name, MFParamCategory::SingleMutable);
int data_index = builder_->signature_->data_index(param_index);
return builder_->mutable_spans_[data_index];
}
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
template<typename T>
GVectorArray_TypedMutableRef<T> vector_mutable(int param_index, StringRef name = "")
{
Functions: refactor virtual array data structures When a function is executed for many elements (e.g. per point) it is often the case that some parameters are different for every element and other parameters are the same (there are some more less common cases). To simplify writing such functions one can use a "virtual array". This is a data structure that has a value for every index, but might not be stored as an actual array internally. Instead, it might be just a single value or is computed on the fly. There are various tradeoffs involved when using this data structure which are mentioned in `BLI_virtual_array.hh`. It is called "virtual", because it uses inheritance and virtual methods. Furthermore, there is a new virtual vector array data structure, which is an array of vectors. Both these types have corresponding generic variants, which can be used when the data type is not known at compile time. This is typically the case when building a somewhat generic execution system. The function system used these virtual data structures before, but now they are more versatile. I've done this refactor in preparation for the attribute processor and other features of geometry nodes. I moved the typed virtual arrays to blenlib, so that they can be used independent of the function system. One open question for me is whether all the generic data structures (and `CPPType`) should be moved to blenlib as well. They are well isolated and don't really contain any business logic. That can be done later if necessary.
2021-03-21 19:31:24 +01:00
return {this->vector_mutable(param_index, name)};
}
GVectorArray &vector_mutable(int param_index, StringRef name = "")
{
Geometry Nodes: refactor array devirtualization Goals: * Better high level control over where devirtualization occurs. There is always a trade-off between performance and compile-time/binary-size. * Simplify using array devirtualization. * Better performance for cases where devirtualization wasn't used before. Many geometry nodes accept fields as inputs. Internally, that means that the execution functions have to accept so called "virtual arrays" as inputs. Those can be e.g. actual arrays, just single values, or lazily computed arrays. Due to these different possible virtual arrays implementations, access to individual elements is slower than it would be if everything was just a normal array (access does through a virtual function call). For more complex execution functions, this overhead does not matter, but for small functions (like a simple addition) it very much does. The virtual function call also prevents the compiler from doing some optimizations (e.g. loop unrolling and inserting simd instructions). The solution is to "devirtualize" the virtual arrays for small functions where the overhead is measurable. Essentially, the function is generated many times with different array types as input. Then there is a run-time dispatch that calls the best implementation. We have been doing devirtualization in e.g. math nodes for a long time already. This patch just generalizes the concept and makes it easier to control. It also makes it easier to investigate the different trade-offs when it comes to devirtualization. Nodes that we've optimized using devirtualization before didn't get a speedup. However, a couple of nodes are using devirtualization now, that didn't before. Those got a 2-4x speedup in common cases. * Map Range * Random Value * Switch * Combine XYZ Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14628
2022-04-26 17:12:34 +02:00
this->assert_correct_param(param_index, name, MFParamCategory::VectorMutable);
int data_index = builder_->signature_->data_index(param_index);
return *builder_->vector_arrays_[data_index];
}
private:
void assert_correct_param(int param_index, StringRef name, MFParamType param_type)
{
UNUSED_VARS_NDEBUG(param_index, name, param_type);
#ifdef DEBUG
BLI_assert(builder_->signature_->param_types[param_index] == param_type);
if (name.size() > 0) {
BLI_assert(builder_->signature_->param_names[param_index] == name);
}
#endif
}
Geometry Nodes: refactor array devirtualization Goals: * Better high level control over where devirtualization occurs. There is always a trade-off between performance and compile-time/binary-size. * Simplify using array devirtualization. * Better performance for cases where devirtualization wasn't used before. Many geometry nodes accept fields as inputs. Internally, that means that the execution functions have to accept so called "virtual arrays" as inputs. Those can be e.g. actual arrays, just single values, or lazily computed arrays. Due to these different possible virtual arrays implementations, access to individual elements is slower than it would be if everything was just a normal array (access does through a virtual function call). For more complex execution functions, this overhead does not matter, but for small functions (like a simple addition) it very much does. The virtual function call also prevents the compiler from doing some optimizations (e.g. loop unrolling and inserting simd instructions). The solution is to "devirtualize" the virtual arrays for small functions where the overhead is measurable. Essentially, the function is generated many times with different array types as input. Then there is a run-time dispatch that calls the best implementation. We have been doing devirtualization in e.g. math nodes for a long time already. This patch just generalizes the concept and makes it easier to control. It also makes it easier to investigate the different trade-offs when it comes to devirtualization. Nodes that we've optimized using devirtualization before didn't get a speedup. However, a couple of nodes are using devirtualization now, that didn't before. Those got a 2-4x speedup in common cases. * Map Range * Random Value * Switch * Combine XYZ Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14628
2022-04-26 17:12:34 +02:00
void assert_correct_param(int param_index, StringRef name, MFParamCategory category)
{
UNUSED_VARS_NDEBUG(param_index, name, category);
#ifdef DEBUG
BLI_assert(builder_->signature_->param_types[param_index].category() == category);
if (name.size() > 0) {
BLI_assert(builder_->signature_->param_names[param_index] == name);
}
#endif
}
GMutableSpan ensure_dummy_single_output(int data_index);
};
2020-07-03 14:25:20 +02:00
} // namespace blender::fn