Depsgraph: More clear function name for transform dependnecy
The name was confusing to a level that it sounded like the relation goes the opposite direction than it is intended.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static void updateDepsgraph(ModifierData *md, const ModifierUpdateDepsgraphConte
|
||||
DEG_add_object_relation(ctx->node, lmd->object, DEG_OB_COMP_GEOMETRY, "Lattice Modifier");
|
||||
DEG_add_object_relation(ctx->node, lmd->object, DEG_OB_COMP_TRANSFORM, "Lattice Modifier");
|
||||
}
|
||||
DEG_add_modifier_to_transform_relation(ctx->node, "Lattice Modifier");
|
||||
DEG_add_depends_on_transform_relation(ctx->node, "Lattice Modifier");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void deformVerts(ModifierData *md,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user