archive/blender-archive
Archived
1
1
Fork 0
Code Pull Requests Packages Activity

Cycles: Code cleanup, spaces around keywords

Browse Source 
This inconsistency drove me totally crazy, it's really confusing
when it's inconsistent especially when you work on both Cycles and
Blender sides.

Shouldn;t cause merge PITA, it's whitespace changes only, Git should
be able to merge it nicely.
This commit is contained in:
Sergey Sharybin
2015-03-28 00:15:15 +05:00
parent 6f43e1dfef
commit 5ff132182d
63 changed files with 384 additions and 384 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
intern/cycles/blender/blender_python.cpp
View File

@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static PyObject *osl_update_node_func(PyObject * /*self*/, PyObject *args)
/* find socket socket */
BL::NodeSocket b_sock(PointerRNA_NULL);
if (param->isoutput) {
if(param->isoutput) {
b_sock = b_node.outputs[param->name.string()];
/* remove if type no longer matches */
if(b_sock && b_sock.bl_idname() != socket_type) {
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static PyObject *osl_update_node_func(PyObject * /*self*/, PyObject *args)
removed = false;
for (b_node.inputs.begin(b_input); b_input != b_node.inputs.end(); ++b_input) {
for(b_node.inputs.begin(b_input); b_input != b_node.inputs.end(); ++b_input) {
if(used_sockets.find(b_input->ptr.data) == used_sockets.end()) {
b_node.inputs.remove(*b_input);
removed = true;
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static PyObject *osl_update_node_func(PyObject * /*self*/, PyObject *args)
}
}
for (b_node.outputs.begin(b_output); b_output != b_node.outputs.end(); ++b_output) {
for(b_node.outputs.begin(b_output); b_output != b_node.outputs.end(); ++b_output) {
if(used_sockets.find(b_output->ptr.data) == used_sockets.end()) {
b_node.outputs.remove(*b_output);
removed = true;