Note that some little parts of code have been dissabled because eval_ctx
was not available there. This should be resolved once DerivedMesh is
replaced.
Last fix only accounted for direct changes to the RB settings, but
failed for, say, object transformations. This fix accounts for any
change that might invalidate the RB cache.
Fix 9cd6b03187 introduced a bug that
prevented simulation after a cache invalidation (for instance when
changing a setting after simulating). This fixes that.
This makes the last time (`ltime`) stored in the rigid body world (`rbw`)
only be updated once a simulation step actually occurs, this prevents
another simulation step from being solved unless the current time is
exactly one frame after the last cached frame. Thus this prevents the
formation of gaps in the cache, such as seen in T50230.
Reviewers: mont29, sergey, angavrilov
Tags: #physics
Maniphest Tasks: T50230
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2458
Noisy change, but safe, and better do it sooner than later if we are to
rework copying code. Also, previous commit shows this *is* useful to
catch some mistakes.
Better to have clear way to tell whether flag is parameter for
BKE_library_foreach_ID_link(), parameter for its callback function, or
return value from this callback function.
This reverts commit 5aa19be912 and b4a721af69.
Due to postponement of particle system rewrite it was decided to put particle code
back into the 2.8 branch for the time being.
This aims at always ensuring that ID.newid (and relevant LIB_TAG_NEW)
stay in clean (i.e. cleared) state by default.
To achieve this, instead of clearing after all id copy call (would be
horribly noisy, and bad for performances), we try to completely remove
the setting of id->newid by default when copying a new ID.
This implies that areas actually needing that info (mainly, object editing
area (make single user...) and make local area) have to ensure they set
it themselves as needed.
This is far from simple change, many complex code paths to consider, so
will need some serious testing. :/
Bullet spring constraint already supports rotational springs, but
they are not exposed in blender UI, likely due to a simple oversight.
Supporting them is as simple as adding a few DNA/RNA properties
with appropriate UI and passing them on to Bullet.
Reviewers: sergof
Reviewed By: sergof
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2331
Point cache read code contains checks designed to prevent it reading
stale data when the relevant simulation code should instead compute
the next frame from the previous one. However in some situations like
motion blur subframes the simulation can't possibly do it and just
exits. This causes completely incorrect motion blur at or after the
last cached frame.
To fix, add a parameter that tells the cache code whether it should
apply the checks and exit, or read what it can even if stale (true
means exactly same as old behavior).
Doing this in cache rather than clamping the frame number better in
the caller lets it handle the case of incomplete cache that stops
before the official last frame.
Reviewed By: mont29, lukastoenne
Maniphest Tasks: T49004
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2144
This commit only adds callbacks which then later be used with major dependency
graph commit, keeping the upcoming commit more clean to follow.
Should be no functional changes so far still.
The issue was caused by the fix for T34108, which modified DNA in order to
get a fallback box collision shape. Not sue why it's needed, we can just get
box shape directly, without modifying user's settings.
This was a ToDo item, for mesh-based rigid body shapes (trimesh, convex)
the operator was simply using the bounding box volume, which can grossly
overestimate the volume and mass.
Calculating the actual volume of a mesh is not so difficult after all,
see e.g.
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/chazhang/publications/icip01_ChaZhang.pdf
This patch also allows calculating the center-of-mass in the same way.
This is currently unused, because the rigid body system assumes the CoM
to be the same as the geometric object center. This is fine most of the
time, adding such user settings for "center-of-mass offset" would also
add quite a bit of complexity in user space, but it could be necessary
at some point. A number of other physical properties could be calculated
using the same principle, e.g. the moment of inertia.
