The previous outlier heuristic only checked whether the pixel is more than
twice as bright compared to the 75% quantile of the 5x5 neighborhood.
While this detected fireflies robustly, it also incorrectly marked a lot of
legitimate small highlights as outliers and filtered them away.
This commit adds an additional condition for marking a pixel as a firefly:
In addition to being above the reference brightness, the lower end of the
3-sigma confidence interval has to be below it.
Since the lower end approximates how low the true value of the pixel might be,
this test separates pixels that are supposed to be very bright from pixels that
are very bright due to random fireflies.
Also, since there is now a reliable outlier filter as a preprocessing step,
the additional confidence interval test in the reconstruction kernel is no
longer needed.
Volume shaders without anything connected to the surface output are treated
as if they had a transparent BSDF as the surface shader in Cycles, so the
denoiser should skip feature pass writing for them just as it does with an
actual transparent BSDF.
If the central pixel is an outlier, the denoiser is supposed to predict its
value from the surrounding pixels. However, in some cases the confidence
interval test would reject every single surrounding pixel, which leaves the
model fitting with no data to work with.
For example, when using a radius of 1, only 9 pixels (due to weighting maybe
even less) will be used, but the transform code may still decide to use a
5-dimensional (or even higher) fit.
This causes severe overfitting and therefore weird pixel values.
To avoid this, this commit limits the amount of dimensions to a third of the
pixel number. For a radius of 3 or more, this doesn't change anything, but
for 1 and 2 it can prevent fireflies and/or negative values being produced.
Once again, numerical instabilities causing the Cholesky decomposition to fail.
However, further increasing the diagonal correction just because of a few
pixels in very specific scenes and settings seems unjustified.
Therefore, this commit simply falls back to the basic NLM-filtered pixel
if the more advanced model fails.
I wouldn't mind switching fully to Google style, but i am against of
mixing two different styles in same project. So just stick to brace
at the new line after function definition.
There were following issues with ccl_restrict_ptr:
- We already had ccl_restrict for all platforms.
- It was secretly adding `const` qualifier to the declaration,
which is quite weird since non-const pointer can also be
declared as restricted.
- We never in Blender are using foo_ptr or FooPtr type definitions,
so not sure why we should introduce such a thing here.
- It is absolutely wrong from semantic point of view to put pointer
into the restrict macro -- const is a part of type, not part of
hint for compiler that some pointer is never aliased.
Denoise commit introduced kernel_write_result() which saves light passes, so
no need to call both kernel_write_result() and kernel_write_light_passes() from
the split kernel.
Weirdly enough. kernel_write_result() does not take care about debug passes.
Extremely bright pixels in the rendered image cause the denoising algorithm
to produce extremely noticable artifacts. Therefore, a heuristic is needed
to exclude these pixels from the filtering process.
The new approach calculates the 75% percentile of the 5x5 neighborhood of
each pixel and flags the pixel if it is more than twice as bright.
During the reconstruction process, flagged pixels are skipped. Therefore,
they don't cause any problems for neighboring pixels, and the outlier pixels
themselves are replaced by a prediction of their actual value based on their
feature pass values and the neighboring pixels.
Therefore, the denoiser now also works as a smarter despeckling filter that
uses a more accurate prediction of the pixel instead of a simple average.
This can be used even if denoising isn't wanted by setting the denoising
radius to 1.
The implementation originally handled four different cases:
Regular glossy, glass, metallic fresnel glossy and diffuse.
However, only the first two are actually used currently. Therefore, this commit
removes the other two, which allows to simplify the code.
Additionally, due to the Principled BSDF, the function arguments are now
identical for glossy and glass, which allows to get rid of some ugly #ifdefs.
Old code was working quite unreliable in combination with fast math
flag, especially when compiling with Clang. It seems we were hitting
result of the following bug submitted to Clang [1].
Basically, it was happening so that (int)sqrtf(64) was 7 when Cycles
is built with Clang but was correct 8 when built with GCC.
This commit works this around. Annoying, but don't see other way to
keep sampling pattern the same for Clang and GCC.
[1] https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=24063
This commit contains the first part of the new Cycles denoising option,
which filters the resulting image using information gathered during rendering
to get rid of noise while preserving visual features as well as possible.
To use the option, enable it in the render layer options. The default settings
fit a wide range of scenes, but the user can tweak individual settings to
control the tradeoff between a noise-free image, image details, and calculation
time.
Note that the denoiser may still change in the future and that some features
are not implemented yet. The most important missing feature is animation
denoising, which uses information from multiple frames at once to produce a
flicker-free and smoother result. These features will be added in the future.
Finally, thanks to all the people who supported this project:
- Google (through the GSoC) and Theory Studios for sponsoring the development
- The authors of the papers I used for implementing the denoiser (more details
on them will be included in the technical docs)
- The other Cycles devs for feedback on the code, especially Sergey for
mentoring the GSoC project and Brecht for the code review!
- And of course the users who helped with testing, reported bugs and things
that could and/or should work better!
Reduce thread divergence in kernel_shader_eval.
Rays are sorted in blocks of 2048 according to shader->id.
On R9 290 Classroom is ~30% faster, and Pabellon Barcelone is ~8% faster.
No sorting for CUDA split kernel.
Reviewers: sergey, maiself
Reviewed By: maiself
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2598
This implements branched path tracing for the split kernel.
General approach is to store the ray state at a branch point, trace the
branched ray as normal, then restore the state as necessary before iterating
to the next part of the path. A state machine is used to advance the indirect
loop state, which avoids the need to add any new kernels. Each iteration the
state machine recreates as much state as possible from the stored ray to keep
overall storage down.
Its kind of hard to keep all the different integration loops in sync, so this
needs lots of testing to make sure everything is working correctly. We should
probably start trying to deduplicate the integration loops more now.
Nonbranched BMW is ~2% slower, while classroom is ~2% faster, other scenes
could use more testing still.
Reviewers: sergey, nirved
Reviewed By: nirved
Subscribers: Blendify, bliblubli
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2611
This patch allows for an unlimited number of textures in Cycles where the hardware allows. It replaces a number static arrays with dynamic arrays and changes the way the flat_slot indices are calculated. Eventually, I'd like to get to a point where there are only flat slots left and textures off all kinds are stored in a single array.
Note that the arrays in DeviceScene are changed from containing device_vector<T> objects to device_vector<T>* pointers. Ideally, I'd like to store objects, but dynamic resizing of a std:vector in pre-C++11 calls the copy constructor, which for a good reason is not implemented for device_vector. Once we require C++11 for Cycles builds, we can implement a move constructor for device_vector and store objects again.
The limits for CUDA Fermi hardware still apply.
Reviewers: tod_baudais, InsigMathK, dingto, #cycles
Reviewed By: dingto, #cycles
Subscribers: dingto, smellslikedonkey
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2650
