The idea is to make include statements more explicit and obvious where the
file is coming from, additionally reducing chance of wrong header being
picked up.
For example, it was not obvious whether bvh.h was refferring to builder
or traversal, whenter node.h is a generic graph node or a shader node
and cases like that.
Surely this might look obvious for the active developers, but after some
time of not touching the code it becomes less obvious where file is coming
from.
This was briefly mentioned in T50824 and seems @brecht is fine with such
explicitness, but need to agree with all active developers before committing
this.
Please note that this patch is lacking changes related on GPU/OpenCL
support. This will be solved if/when we all agree this is a good idea to move
forward.
Reviewers: brecht, lukasstockner97, maiself, nirved, dingto, juicyfruit, swerner
Reviewed By: lukasstockner97, maiself, nirved, dingto
Subscribers: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2586
Before, Cycles would first sync the shader exactly as shown in the UI, then determine and sync the used attributes and later optimize the shader.
Therefore, even completely unconnected nodes would cause unneccessary attributes to be synced.
The reason for this is to avoid frequent resyncs when editing shaders interactively, but it can still be avoided for noninteractive renders - which is what this commit does.
Reviewed by: sergey
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2285
Displacement is now a per material setting, which means old files will have to
be updated if they had used displacement. Cool side effect of this change is
material previews now show displacement.
Reviewed By: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2140
The shader sync code used the anisotropic version of the Ashikhmin-Shirley closure for both
Anisotropic and Glossy BSDF, which caused a failed assert because the anisotropic closure
expects an addiitonal SVM node.
This commit adds a new distribution to the Glossy, Anisotropic and Glass BSDFs that implements the
multiple-scattering microfacet model described in the paper "Multiple-Scattering Microfacet BSDFs with the Smith Model".
Essentially, the improvement is that unlike classical GGX, which only models single scattering and assumes
the contribution of multiple bounces to be zero, this new model performs a random walk on the microsurface until
the ray leaves it again, which ensures perfect energy conservation.
In practise, this means that the "darkening problem" - GGX materials becoming darker with increasing
roughness - is solved in a physically correct and efficient way.
The downside of this model is that it has no (known) analytic expression for evalation. However, it can be
evaluated stochastically, and although the correct PDF isn't known either, the properties of MIS and the
balance heuristic guarantee an unbiased result at the cost of slightly higher noise.
Reviewers: dingto, #cycles, brecht
Reviewed By: dingto, #cycles, brecht
Subscribers: bliblubli, ace_dragon, gregzaal, brecht, harvester, dingto, marcog, swerner, jtheninja, Blendify, nutel
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2002
The improved Hosek / Wilkie model was added during my GSoC 2013 and the default since then.
The older model was kinda kept for compatibility, but after more than 2 years it's time to remove it.
The Hosek / Wilkie model is more realistic anyway, and people who really want a day / night transition can mix the Sky Shader with another one (e.g. color) and fade between the two.
Basically the idea is to make code robust against extending
enum options in the future by falling back to a known safe
default setting when RNA is set to something unknown.
While this approach solves the issues similar to T47377,
but it wouldn't really help when/if any of the RNA values
gets ever deprecated and removed. There'll be no simple
solution to that apart from defining explicit mapping from
RNA value to Cycles one.
Another part which isn't so great actually is that we now
have to have some enum guards and give some explicit values
to the enum items, but we can live with that perhaps.
Reviewers: dingto, juicyfruit, lukasstockner97, brecht
Reviewed By: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1785
This way we avoid passing structures which could be up to
few hundred bytes by value to the utility functions.
Ideally we'll also have to add `const` qualifier in majority
of the calls, but C++ RNA does not allow us to do that because
it does not know if some function modifies contents or not.
The issue was caused by different AABB used by Cycles and texture sampler.
Instead of trying to keep this two functions in sync we now do have an
utility call in the point density node to query the AABB.
This commit adds "Bands Saw" and "Rings Saw" to the options for the Wave texture node in Cycles, behaving similar to the Saw option in BI textures.
Requested by @cekuhnen on BA.
Reviewers: dingto, sergey
Subscribers: cekuhnen
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1699
Vector mapping node was doing some weird mapping of both original and mapped
coordinates. Mapping of original coordinates was caused by the clamping nature
of the LUT generated from the node. Mapping of the mapped value again was quite
totally obscure -- one needed to constantly keep in mind that actual value will
be scaled up and moved down.
This commit makes it so values in the vector curve mapping are always absolute.
In fact, it is now behaving quite the same as RGB curve mapping node and the
code could be de-duplicated. Keeping the code duplicated for a bit so it's more
clear what exact parts of the node changed.
Reviewers: brecht
Subscribers: bassamk
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1672
Previously RGB Curves node will clamp input to 0..1 which is rather useless
when one wants to use HDR image textures and do bit of correction on them.
Now kernel code supports extrapolation of baked LUT based on first/last two
table points and performs linear extrapolation.
The only tricky part is to guess the range to bake the LUT for. Currently
it's using simple approach -- minmax of the input curves. While this behaves
ok for the simple cases it's easy to trick the system up causing incorrect
results.
Not sure we can solve those issues in a general case and since the new code
is giving more expected results it's not that bad actually. In the worst
case artist migh always create explicit point to make sure LUT is created
for the needed HDR range.
Reviewers: brecht, juicyfruit
Subscribers: sebastian_k
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1658
Previously render nodes will be always created with just a VECTOR socket
type and then those sockets will try to be set as all point, vector and
normal to work around lack of such a subtype distinguishing in blender.
This change makes it so subtype is being queried from OSL itself and
proper subtupe is being used for socket.
It's still not in use for the official builds because it requires changes
applied recently on the 1.7 branch of OSL:
https://github.com/imageworks/OpenShadingLanguage/commit/f70e58f
This solves artists confusion reported in T46117.
Reviewers: #cycles, juicyfruit
Reviewed By: #cycles, juicyfruit
Subscribers: juicyfruit
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1627
The issue was caused by possible use of object->derivedFinal from the render
thread, The patch tries to eliminate (or at least minimize, huh) amount of
access to the derivedFinal of a source object. It's still possible that in
the case of particle source derived mesh will be still unsafely used, but
with the patch applied we can easily change runtime part of the code and
cache derived mesh on the preparation stage.
Some ideas for the future:
- Check whether cache() was called on the point density node when calling
calc().
- Cache derivedMesh in the runtime part of point density node to avoid
possible remained thread conflicts.
- NULL the runtime part of the node on .blend load
Reviewers: campbellbarton, plasmasolutions
Reviewed By: plasmasolutions
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1614
This is sort of extension of existing Use Environment option which now allows to
disable AO on the render layer basis.
Useful in cases like disabling AO for the background because it might make it
too flat and so.
Reviewers: juicyfruit, dingto, brecht
Reviewed By: brecht
Subscribers: eyecandy, venomgfx
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1633
This commit exposes the interpolation parameter for environment textures (requested by DolpheenDream on IRC), just as it already is for image textures.
Reviewers: sergey
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1544
Technically it was all wrong and it should have been called Extend instead
of Clip. Got confused by the naming in different libraries.
More options are still to come.
That was basically not an issue with interpolation, but rather missing wrapping
options and periodic wrapping was always used.
It's still a bit questionable why certain graphics cards were doing clamping in
the file from the report, that's not something what is expected to happen from
the settings of textures being passed to GPU. In any case this issue i still
didn't manage to reproduce on any of the available GPUs, might be something
related on driver glitch or so.
In any case CPU now should behave just fine, rest of the issues we'll need to be
able to reproduce first.
Currently only two mappings are supported by API, which is Repeat (old behavior)
and new Clip behavior. Internally this extension is being converted to periodic
flag which was already supported but wasn't exposed.
There's no support for OpenCL yet because of the way how we pack images into a
single texture.
Those settings are not exposed to UI or anywhere else and there should be no
functional changes so far.
