Values outside the 0..1 range produce negative colors, so now clamp to that
range everywhere. Also fixes improper handling of hue > 2.0 in some places.
This inconsistency drove me totally crazy, it's really confusing
when it's inconsistent especially when you work on both Cycles and
Blender sides.
Shouldn;t cause merge PITA, it's whitespace changes only, Git should
be able to merge it nicely.
This mainly happens when over-saturating already saturated color.
After some discussion with Campbell and loads of tests we decided
to clamp the result RGB color. As an alternative we might want to
clamp corrected HSV values instead, but that would lead to some
larger changes in the render results.
TODO: The same is to be done for compositor nodes.
This to avoids build conflicts with libc++ on FreeBSD, these __ prefixed values
are reserved for compilers. I apologize to anyone who has patches or branches
and has to go through the pain of merging this change, it may be easiest to do
these same replacements in your code and then apply/merge the patch.
Ref T37477.
* Added a node to convert wavelength (in nanometers, from 380nm to 780nm) to RGB values. This can be useful to match real world colors easier.
* Code cleanup:
** Moved color functions (xyz and hsv) into dedicated utility files.
** Remove svm_lerp(), use interp() instead.
Documentation:
http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Doc:2.6/Manual/Render/Cycles/Nodes/More#Wavelength
Example render:
http://www.pasteall.org/pic/show.php?id=53202
This is part of my GSoC 2013. (revisions 57322, 57326, 57335 and 57367 from soc-2013-dingto).
* Adding hue instead of removing it.
fmod doesn't work as % when it comes to negative numbers:
fmod( 1.3, 1) == 1.3 % 1 == 0.3
fmod(-0.3, 1) != -0.3 % 1
.........................
note, the OSL code has a problem.
In the original node the input and output nodes have the same name (Color).
So this will be fixed here once Brecht come up with a nice autorenaming (or we do a doversion patch) for that.
