So far it was needed to declare a new RNA struct to `RNA_access.h` manually.
Since 9b298cf3db we generate a `RNA_prototypes.h` for RNA property
declarations. Now this also includes the RNA struct declarations, so they don't
have to be added manually anymore.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D13862
Reviewed by: brecht, campbellbarton
Use a shorter/simpler license convention, stops the header taking so
much space.
Follow the SPDX license specification: https://spdx.org/licenses
- C/C++/objc/objc++
- Python
- Shell Scripts
- CMake, GNUmakefile
While most of the source tree has been included
- `./extern/` was left out.
- `./intern/cycles` & `./intern/atomic` are also excluded because they
use different header conventions.
doc/license/SPDX-license-identifiers.txt has been added to list SPDX all
used identifiers.
See P2788 for the script that automated these edits.
Reviewed By: brecht, mont29, sergey
Ref D14069
This is similar to e032ca2e25 which removed the
callback for volumes. Now that we have geometry sets, there is
no need to define a callback for every data type, and this wasn't
used. Procedural curves/hair editing will use nodes rather than new
modifier types anyway.
- BKE_mesh_copy_parameters_for_eval to be used for evaluated meshes only
as it doesn't handle ID user-counts.
- BKE_mesh_copy_parameters is a general function for copying parameters
between meshes.
This allows us to remove a callback from the modifier type info struct.
In the future the these modifiers might just be replaced by nodes
internally anyway, but in the meantime it's nice to unify the handling
of evaluated geometry a bit.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11080
The problem was that you could getting write access to a grid from a
`const Volume *` without breaking const correctness. I encountered this
when working on support for volumes in the bounding box node. For
geometry nodes there is an important distinction between getting data
"for read" and "for write", with the former returning a `const` version
of the data.
Also, for volumes it was necessary to cast away const, since all of
the relevant functions in `volume.cc` didn't have const versions. This
patch adds `const` in these places, distinguising between "for read"
and "for write" versions of functions where necessary.
The downside is that loading and unloading in the global volume cache
needs const write-access to some member variables. I see that as an
inherent problem that comes up with caching that never has a beautiful
solution anyway.
Some of the const-ness could probably be propogated futher in EEVEE
code, but I'll leave that out, since there is another level of caching.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10916
This node takes a volume and generates a mesh on it's "surface".
The surface is defined by a threshold value.
Currently, the node only works on volumes generated by the
Points to Volume node. This limitation will be resolved soonish.
Ref T84605.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10243
Since the initial merge of the geometry nodes project, the modifyPointCloud
function already was already modifying a geometry set. The function wasn't
renamed back then, because then the merge would have touched many
more files.
Ref T83357.
The issue was that the volume for the current frame
might not have been loaded already by the time the
modifier runs.
The solution is simply to make sure that the volume
is loaded. This is similar to the Volume Displace modifier.
This modifier is the opposite of the recently added Mesh to Volume modifier.
It converts the "surface" of a volume into a mesh. The "surface" is defined
by a threshold value. All voxels with a density higher than the threshold
are considered to be inside the volume, while all others will be outside.
By default, the resolution of the generated mesh depends on the voxel
size of the volume grid. The resolution can be customized. It should be
noted that a lower resolution might not make this modifier faster. This
is because we have to downsample the openvdb grid, which isn't a cheap
operation.
Converting a mesh to a volume and then back to a mesh is possible,
but it does require two separate mesh objects for now.
Reviewers: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D9141
