This way it doesn't have to be stored as DNA runtime pointers or passed
down as a function argument. Currently there is now no property or
button to enable debugging, this will be added again later.
This helps to create some variation in a hair system, which can
otherwise become very uniform and boring. It's yet another confusing
setting in a system that should have been nodified, but only option for
now (broken windows ...)
Conflicts:
source/blender/blenkernel/intern/particle_system.c
source/blender/physics/intern/BPH_mass_spring.cpp
framing method instead of the Frenet frame.
The Frenet frame is very succeptible to sudden twists along straight
sections of a curve where the second derivative (curvature) becomes 0.
This returns a general status (success/no-convergence/other) along with
basic statistics (min/max/average) for the error value and the number
of iterations. It allows some general estimation of the simulation
quality and detection of critical settings that could become a problem.
Better visualization and extended feedback can follow later.
This will allow us to implement moving reference frames for hair and
make "fictitious" forces optional, aiding in creating stable and
controllable hair systems.
Adding data in this place is a nasty hack, but it's too difficult to
encode as a DM data layer and the whole cloth modifier/DM intermediate
data copying for hair should be removed anyway.
as forces, velocities, contact points etc.
This uses a hash table to store debug elements (dots, lines, vectors at
this point). The hash table allows continuous display of elements that
are generated only in certain time steps, e.g. contact points, while
avoiding massive memory allocation. In any case, this system is really
a development feature, but very helpful in finding issues with the
internal solver data.
Not much to add, modifier uses same code as operator basically, only key difference
is that modifier will never create data layers itself, you have to use dedicated operator
for that.
The issue was caused by render engine duplicating the curve object because
it then converts the object to mesh. The mesh deform duplication code didn't
duplicate binded data, so after duplication modifier is no longer applyable.
So now copyData of mesh deform would copy data needed for binding. This solves
reported render bug and also solves possible frustration when duplicating an
object with mesh deform in the viewport with Shift-D.
Checked other modifiers and laplacian deform already was copying binded data.
Didn't see other modifiers which might also need to copy extra data.
It now supports different scheduling schemas: dynamic and static.
Static one is the default and it splits work into equal number of
range iterations.
Dynamic one allocates chunks of 32 iterations which then being
dynamically send to a thread which is currently idling.
This gives slightly better performance. Still some tricks are
possible to have. For example we can use some smarter static scheduling
when one thread might steal tasks from another threads when it runs
out of work to be done.
Also removed unneeded spin lock in the mesh deform evaluation,
on the first glance it seemed to be a reduction involved here but
int fact threads are just adding value to the original vertex
coordinates. No write access to the same element of vertexCos
happens from separate threads.
Quite straightforward change, don't think some extra explanation is needed.
This gives about 15% speedup of the modifier evaluation on my laptop.
Reviewers: campbellbarton
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D836
This commit switches meshdeform modifier to use threads to evaluate
the vertices positions using the central task scheduler.
SO now we've got an utility function to help splitting the for loop
into tasks using BLI_task module which is pretty straightforward to
use: it gets range (which is an integer lower and higher bounds) and
the function and userdata to be invoked for each of the iterations.
The only weak point for now is the passing the data to the callback,
this isn't so trivial to improve in pure C.
Reviewers: campbellbarton
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D838
This is not needed when we tag normals as dirty, but in simple cases, if offset has some
rotation (or non-uniform scaling) component, vertex normals has to be corrected.
