The Exact modifier code had been written to avoid using BMesh but
in the initial release the modifier still converted all Meshes to
BMeshes, and then after running the boolean code on the BMeshes,
converted the result back to a Mesh.
This change skips that. Most of the work here is in getting the
Custom Data layers right. The approach taken is to merge default
layers from all operand meshes into the final result, and then
use the original verts, edges, polys, and loops to copy or interpolate
the appropriate custom data layers from all operands into the result.
This patch adds icons to the right side of nodes when they encounter a
a problem. When hovered, a tooltip displays describing the encountered
while evaluating the node.
Some examples are: attribute doesn't exist, mesh has no faces,
incorrect attribute type, etc. Exposing more messages to the system
will be an ongoing process. Multiple warnings per node are supported.
The system is implemented somewhat generically so that the basic
structure can also be used to store more information from evaluation
for the interface, like a list of available attributes.
Currently the messages are just button tooltips. They could be styled
differently in the future. Another limitation is that every instance of
a node group in a parent node tree will have the same error messages,
the "evaluation context" used to decide when to display the tooltips
must be extended to support node tree paths.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10290
Since the derived node tree is already build for the evaluation system,
it's simpler to pass a derived node to the params struct. This will also
allow context lookups in nested node groups for node error messages,
since the derived node has that information readily accessible.
Currently moving or changing an object references in a node modifier's
node group does not trigger re-evaluation. Because there is no collection
relation in the dependency graph, we must add the relation to all objects
in the collection individually.
This node takes a volume and generates a mesh on it's "surface".
The surface is defined by a threshold value.
Currently, the node only works on volumes generated by the
Points to Volume node. This limitation will be resolved soonish.
Ref T84605.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10243
Normally sockets only have one input link. This commit adds the back-end
changes needed to use multiple input links per socket.
Multi-input sockets can be defined with a new flag in `bNodeSocketType`.
The changes necessary to make the sockets work in the geometry nodes
evaluator are generalizing input socket values as a vector of values,
and supporting this in the derived node tree structure.
This patch should contain no functional changes. Two upcoming patches
will use this system for the "Join Geometry" node and expose link picking
and updated display in the UI: D10069 and D10181.
Reviewed By: Jacques Lucke, Hans Goudey
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10067
There are two issues here. First, like in T81988 there are cases
where the modifier would deform some vertices immediately after
bind. This is caused by wrong assumptions in the code about the
possible relative angles between various vectors, which can cause
negative weights that don't blend correctly to appear.
Specifically, it seems originally the code assumes that the
centroid-point vector in the polygon plane lies somewhere
between the mid-edge vectors. This is however not necessarily
the case for distant vertices, because the polygon is not
guaranteed to be truly planar, so normal projection may be
a bit off. The code has to use signed angles and checks to
support all possible angular arrangements.
The second issue is very thin and long triangles, which tend
to be very spatially unstable in their thin dimension, resulting
in excess deformation. The code was weighting distance using
the distances between the centroid and the mid-edge points, which
in this case end up as nearly opposite vectors of sizable length
and don't correctly represent how thin the triangle actually is.
It is thus better to use centroid-to-line distances, and an
additional even stricter value for the midpoint that will use
only 3 vertices at evaluation time.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10065
The RNA path used for animating the settings passed to the node tree
is incorrect. Currently it's just `settings.property_name`, but it's
the path from the ID, not the modifier, so it should be
`modifiers[modifier_name].settings.property_name`.
However, the "Settings" struct is separated in RNA and DNA, which means
that the callback to get the RNA path does not know about the modifier's
name in order to fill the above path, so some reference to the modifier
in the "Settings" struct would be necessary, which would create a
convoluted layout in the `ModifierData` struct.
Instead, this commit simply removes the "Settings" struct from RNA,
which isn't as elegant from the point of view of the Python API,
but otherwise it's a nice simplification. Note that we don't remove the
"Settings" struct from DNA, because it would break reading old files.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10175
There are a couple of operations that are meant to set the active
modifier that currently don't. The first is a mouse press on the drag
icon on the right of the header, and the second is mouse presses on
modifier sub-panels headers.
This was an oversight in the implementation, especially the second,
because the blank space on the right of a sub-panel header often looks
just like the blank space elsewhere on the modifier's panel that
*does* set the active modifier.
Note that this purposefully doesn't include collapsing and expanding
the modifier as operations that set the active, since regardless of
whether that makes sense, it wasn't in the agreed upon design, which
would ideally not need changing for 2.92.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10155
Things like pointers to particle systems, or softbody data being stored
outside of its modifier, make it impossible for internal modifier copy
data code to be self-contained currently. It requires extra processing.
In existing code this was handled in several different places, in
several ways, and alltogether fairly inconsistently. Some cases were
even not properly handled, causing e.g. crashes as in T82945.
This commit addresses those issues by:
* Adding comments about the hackish/unsafe parts `psys` implies when
copying some modifier data (since we need to ensure particle system
copying and remapping of those pointers separately).
* Adding as-best-as-possible handling of those cases to
`BKE_object_copy_modifier` (note that it remains fragile, but is
expected to behave 'good enough' in any practical usecase).
* Remove special handling for specific editor code
(`copy_or_reuse_particle_system`). This should never have been
accepted in ED code area, and is now handled by
`BKE_object_copy_modifier`.
* Factorize copying of the whole modifier stack into new
`BKE_object_modifier_stack_copy`, now used by both `object_copy_data`
and `BKE_object_link_modifiers`.
Note that this implies that `BKE_object_copy_modifier` and
`BKE_object_copy_gpencil_modifier` are now to be used exclusively to
copy single modifiers. Full modifier stack copy should always use
`BKE_object_modifier_stack_copy` instead.
Fix T82945: Crash when dragging modifiers in Outliner.
Maniphest Tasks: T82945
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10148
Things like pointers to particle systems, or softbody data being stored
outside of its modifier, make it impossible for internal modifier copy
data code to be self-contained currently. It requires extra processing.
In existing code this was handled in several different places, in
several ways, and alltogether fairly inconsistently. Some cases were
even not properly handled, causing e.g. crashes as in T82945.
This commit addresses those issues by:
* Adding comments about the hackish/unsafe parts `psys` implies when
copying some modifier data (since we need to ensure particle system
copying and remapping of those pointers separately).
* Adding as-best-as-possible handling of those cases to
`BKE_object_copy_modifier` (note that it remains fragile, but is
expected to behave 'good enough' in any practical usecase).
* Remove special handling for specific editor code
(`copy_or_reuse_particle_system`). This should never have been
accepted in ED code area, and is now handled by
`BKE_object_copy_modifier`.
* Factorize copying of the whole modifier stack into new
`BKE_object_modifier_stack_copy`, now used by both `object_copy_data`
and `BKE_object_link_modifiers`.
Note that this implies that `BKE_object_copy_modifier` and
`BKE_object_copy_gpencil_modifier` are now to be used exclusively to
copy single modifiers. Full modifier stack copy should always use
`BKE_object_modifier_stack_copy` instead.
Fix T82945: Crash when dragging modifiers in Outliner.
Maniphest Tasks: T82945
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10148
Handle return value of `fread()`, by showing an error message when the
file cannot be read from and stopping further processing. Not only is
error handing a good idea, it also prevents GCC from warning that the
return value of `fread()` should not be ignored.
This is similar to {D9916}.
Reviewed By: campbellbarton
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10079
Partially reverts 2250b5cefe.
Removing the user count and fake user count icons was controversial (which was
expected) and there are a few further changes needed, that won't make it in
time for the release, see D9946.
While there is a design to bring back the user count and fake user indicators,
a new design idea was proposed that the UI team wants to follow. This came too
late for the 2.92 release, the new design is targeted at the 2.93 release now.
Meanwhile, UI team decision was to simply revert the design changes.
The new design is being worked on in https://developer.blender.org/T84669.
Note that this commit does not revert some internal changes done in
2250b5cefe. Namely the introduction of `ed_util_ops.c` and data-block
operators in there. These will still be needed in the new design.
This patch allows connecting wires for object and collection socket
types to the "Group Input" node, which exposes them to be adjusted
in the modifier.
Thanks to @angavrilov's recent work in rB8964c02348f6, it is now
possible to edit pointer IDProperties in the interface when they are
drawn with `uiItemPointerR`.
This patch is composed of a few changes:
- Add code to create pointer properties in the modifier settings for
object and collection sockets, and also to draw them in the UI.
- Also search through the modifier's `IDProperty` settings to find IDs
used by the modifier.
- Change the setting's UI layout to support the change.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10056
The `object.collision.use` flag was treated as a redundant marker
of the existence of the modifier, going as far as adding/removing
it when the value was changed, which is not actually very useful.
Removing the modifier loses its position in the stack, and requires
a dependency graph rebuild. It feels it may be a legacy flag?
What would be useful however is the ability to toggle collisions
dynamically without removing the modifier. This patch adjusts the
code to keep the modifier when the flag is disabled, and add it
if it doesn't exist when the flag is enabled. The modifier now
checks the flag at the start and quickly exits after cleaning
up stale data. The redesigned setting is exposed in the UI.
Collisions can't be disabled by simply using the modifier enable
flags because the modifier merely saves a snapshot of the mesh at
a certain point of the modifier stack for other objects to use,
and thus has to be able to clear the stale data.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10064
The nodes were selected in new node groups because they are by default,
but there's no particular reason for them to be selected, and it can
be distracting.
Using malloc to allocate a temporary array for each vertex,
which most commonly contains just 4 elements, is not efficient.
Checking the mode with a switch is also better.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10040
There is no need to first copy weights to a separate array,
or create the data layer if it doesn't exist. The threaded
code can retrieve the weight directly from the layer.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10015
Use the BMesh symmetrize operator instead of using the modifier code.
While we could support shape-keys with the existing code used by the
mirror modifier, we'd need to add code-paths for evaluated mesh & bmesh
conversion to handle shape-keys differently just for this one case,
since we want to avoid copying & processing shape-keys layers for
evaluated meshes in general.
- Remove ternary operators when both values are the same.
- Remove break after return.
- Remove redundant NULL checks for code which handles
those cases immediately beforehand.
These two operators (one for grease pencil, one for other objects)
copy a single modifier from the active object to all selected objects.
The operators are exposed in the dropdown menus in modifier headers.
Note that It's currently possible to drag and drop modifiers between
objects in the outliner, but that only works for dragging to one object
at a time. Modifiers can also be copied with the "Make Links" operator,
but that copies *all* modifiers rather than just one. The placement
and scope of these new operators allow for more useful poll messages
and error messages as well.
Every object type that supports modifiers is supported. Although hook
and collision modifiers aren't supported because of an unexplained
comment in `BKE_object_copy_modifier`, other than that, every modifier
type is supported, including particle systems, nodes modifiers, etc.
The new modifiers are set active, which required two small tweaks to
`object.c` and `particle.c`.
Reviewed By: Hans Goudey (with additional edits)
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D9537
The previous design is rather old and has a couple of problems:
* Scalability: The current solution of adding little icon buttons next to the
data-block name field doesn't scale well. It only works if there's a small
number of operations. We need to be able to place more items there for better
data-block management. Especially with the introduction of library overrides.
* Discoverability: It's not obvious what some of the icons do. They appear and
disappear, but it's not obvious why some are available at times and others
not.
* Unclear Status: Currently their library status (linked, indirectly linked,
broken link, library override) isn't really clear.
* Unusual behavior: Some of the icon buttons allow Shift or Ctrl clicking to
invoke alternative behaviors. This is not a usual pattern in Blender.
This patch does the following changes:
* Adds a menu to the right of the name button to access all kinds of operations
(create, delete, unlink, user management, library overrides, etc).
* Make good use of the "disabled hint" for tooltips, to explain why buttons are
disabled. The UI team wants to establish this as a good practise.
* Use superimposed icons for duplicate and unlink, rather than extra buttons
(uses less space, looks less distracting and is a nice + consistent design
language).
* Remove fake user and user count button, they are available from the menu now.
* Support tooltips for superimposed icons (committed mouse hover feedback to
master already).
* Slightly increase size of the name button - it was already a bit small
before, and the move from real buttons to superimposed icons reduces usable
space for the name itself.
* More clearly differentiate between duplicate and creating a new data-block.
The latter is only available in the menu.
* Display library status icon on the left (linked, missing library, overridden,
asset)
* Disables "Make Single User" button - in review we weren't sure if there are
good use-cases for it, so better to see if we can remove it.
Note that I do expect some aspects of this design to change still. I think some
changes are problematic, but others disagreed. I will open a feedback thread on
devtalk to see what others think.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D8554
Reviewed by: Bastien Montagne
Design discussed and agreed on with the UI team, also see T79959.
This uses the "id" attribute to randomly pick instances from a collection
for each point.
There is one issue. When the collection is updated (e.g. when an object is
added to it), the nodes modifier is not automatically updated. It seems
like we don't have the infrastructure to support this dependency yet.
The same issue exists in the Boolean modifier and with collision collections.
This should be solved separately soonish.
When "Whole Collection" is disabled, one direct child of the input collection
is instanced at each point. A direct child can be an object or a collection.
Currently, all objects are picked approximately equally often. In the future,
we will provide more control over which point gets which instance.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D9884
Ref T82372.
The geometry-nodes features no longer depend on the point cloud object.
Therefore the point cloud object, although important in the future, can
be postponed until we have render and edit mode fully working.
This reverts commits:
* ea74ed5a7a.
* dc614c68ef.
Remove DNA headers, using forward declarations where possible.
Also removed duplicate header, header including it's self
and unnecessary inclusion of libc system headers from BKE header.
Sometimes the geometry nodes modifier does support mapping and
sometimes it does not. We have no infrastruture to determine this ahead
of time currently. In order to support common use cases, it makes sense
to add this flag to the modifier.
One such common use case is to use the mesh as surface that other
things are distributed on. Often, the distribution is controlled by vertex
groups. Therefore, it would be helpful if the modifier is evaluated
when the object is in vertex paint mode. This allows the user to see the
distributed objects while painting.
If the nodes modifier transforms the mesh in any way, vertex painting
might not work as expected anymore, because the `deformMatrices`
callback is not implemented. I'm not sure how this can be solved nicely, yet.
Without this, the modifier evaluation code might remove any
vertex groups from the mesh for performance reasons.
We can't say for sure whether the node group will need the vertex
groups, but it is quite likely.
Ref T83357.
Required changes to make it compile with clang tidy:
* Use c++ includes like (e.g. climits instead limits.h).
* Insert type casts when casting from void* to something else.
* Replace NULL with nullptr.
* Insert casts from int to enum.
* Replace designed initializers (not supported in C++ yet).
* Use blender::Vector instead of BLI_array_staticdeclare (does not compile with C++).
* Replace typedef statements.
Ref T83357.
This should be a final piece of the changes for the active modifier
interface. Before, it was necessary to click on the blank space of a
modifier panel to set it active (not the header), this commit allows
clicking on the icon also.
The spacing with the spacing with the expand button would ideally
be a bit larger, but the layout system doesn't offer much flexibility
here.
Since the initial merge of the geometry nodes project, the modifyPointCloud
function already was already modifying a geometry set. The function wasn't
renamed back then, because then the merge would have touched many
more files.
Ref T83357.
