Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
46feccdfcf Share more inline "Done" code between Differential and Diffusion
Summary:
Ref T13222. See PHI995. Before making a change to inline rendering, consolidate this code for generating the "alice added inlines comments." and "alice marked X inlines as done." transactions.

Both Differential and Diffusion have four very similar chunks of code. Merge them into shared methods and reduce code duplication across the methods.

(In the next change, I plan to hide the "done" story when the mark affects your own inline, since users marking their own inlines as "done" is generally not very interesting or useful.)

Test Plan: As author and reviewer/auditor, added inlines in Differential and Diffusion. As author, marked own and others inlines as done and undone. Got sensible transaction rendering and persistence of "Done".

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13222

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19858
2018-12-10 15:36:52 -08:00
epriestley
b88a87c43a Address a transaction issue with some audit actions not applying correctly
Summary:
See <https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/cannot-accept-commits-in-audit/2166/>.

In D19842, I changed `PhabricatorEditField->shouldGenerateTransactionsFromComment()`.

  - Previously, it bailed on `getIsConduitOnly()`.
  - After the patch, it bails on a missing `getCommentActionLabel()`.

The old code was actually wrong, and it was previously possible to apply possibly-invalid actions in some cases (or, at least, sneak them through this layer: they would only actually apply if not validated properly).

In practice, it let a different bug through: we sometimes loaded commits without loading their audit authority, so testing whether the viewer could "Accept" the commit or not (or take some other actions like "Raise Concern") would always fail and throw an exception: "Trying to access data not attached to this object..."

Fixing the insufficiently-strict transaction generation code exposed the "authority not attached" bug, which caused some actions to fail to generate transactions.

This appeared in the UI as either an unhelpful error ("You can't post an empty comment") or an action with no effect. The unhelpful error was because we show that error if you aren't taking any //other// actions, and we wouldn't generate an "Accept" action because of the interaction of these bugs, so the code thought you were just posting an empty comment.

Test Plan: Without leaving comments, accepted and rejected commits. No more error messages, and actions took effect.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: stephan.senkbeil, hskiba

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19845
2018-12-09 16:39:21 -08:00
Jakub Vrana
9f3cde4db7 Fix errors found by PHPStan
Test Plan: None.

Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Subscribers: epriestley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17377
2017-02-18 09:24:56 +00:00
epriestley
b5722a9963 Use EditEngine stacked comments in Diffusion
Summary: Ref T10978. Ref T8739. Fixes T10446. Converts Diffusion to modern comment/preview code, like Differential.

Test Plan: {F2342933}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10978, T10446, T8739

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17183
2017-01-11 14:46:48 -08:00
epriestley
82c891f586 Add modern "Accept", "Raise Concern" and "Resign" transactions to Audit
Summary:
Ref T10978. This prepares for swapping the comment UI to stacked actions.

These are only accessible via the API.

Test Plan: Used the API to accept, raise concern with, and reject commits.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10978

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17182
2017-01-11 13:56:48 -08:00
epriestley
255e3fb1e4 Allow auditors to be added and removed from commits in a modern way
Summary: Ref T10978. Ref T7676. Make auditors work more like reviewers, so they can be freely added or removed.

Test Plan:
  - Interacted with auditors via "Edit Commit" and API.
  - Comment area is still oldschool and doesn't work yet.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10978, T7676

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17181
2017-01-11 13:56:34 -08:00
epriestley
2941b34acb Add "diffusion.commit.edit", a v3 edit API endpoint for commits
Summary: Ref T10978. This currently does almost nothing, but gets it in place so I can add stuff to it.

Test Plan: Made a comment on a commit using the API.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10978

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17178
2017-01-11 10:38:14 -08:00
epriestley
5e07358826 Preserve "Autoclose?" information on new Commit edit flow
Summary: Ref T10978. The current "Edit" flow has some autoclose info. This isn't necessarily the best place to put it in the long run, but preseve it for now since the documentation refers to it.

Test Plan: {F2340658}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10978

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17176
2017-01-11 10:31:20 -08:00
epriestley
7ff0be1bde Bring very basic EditEngine support to commits
Summary:
Ref T10978. After T11114, we have some features (like the old code for the haunted comment panel) which are only used by Diffusion. I want to modernize it so I can nuke them. T10978 also describes many bugs which are only fixable after modernizing.

This adds very basic EditEngine support for commits/audit. You can't create new commits with this workflow, just tag/update existing ones.

Test Plan: {F2340347}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10978

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17175
2017-01-11 09:34:46 -08:00