Summary:
Ref T13429. It's currently possible to write "TYPE_EDGE" relationships for the "object has project" edge to PHIDs which may not actually be projects. Today, this fatals.
As a first step, unfatal it. T13429 discusses general improvements and greater context.
Test Plan:
Used "maniphest.edit" to write a "project" edge to a user PHID, viewed the task in the UI. Previously it fataled; now it renders unusually (the object is "tagged" with a user) but faithfully reflects database state.
{F6957606}
Maniphest Tasks: T13429
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20860
Summary: Fixes T13368. Some workflows (like "Move tasks to...") execute board layout without objects to update. In these cases, we can hit a warning because `objectPHIDs` is not initialized to `array()`.
Test Plan: Went through the "Move tasks to..." workflow on a workboard, no longer saw a warning when trying to iterate over an empty `objectPHIDs` list.
Maniphest Tasks: T13368
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20701
Summary:
Depends on D20680. Ref T4900. The "BoardLayoutEngine" operates on PHIDs without knowledge of the underlying objects, but this means it has to be sensitive to PHID input order when falling back to a default layout order.
We use "default layout order" on workboards which are sorted by "Natual" order but which have one or more cards which no user has ever reordered. For example, if you add 10 tasks to a project, then create a board, there's no existing order for those tasks in the "Backlog" column. The layout engine uses the input order to place them in the column, with the expectation that input order is ID/creation order, so new cards will end up on top.
I think this code never really made an explicit effort to guarantee that the LayoutEngine received objects in ID order, and it just sort of happened to by coincidence and good fortune. Some recent change has disrupted this, so the edit operation can end up with the PHIDs arranged in arbitrary order.
Explicitly put them in ID order so we always get an implicit default layout order to fall back to. Also, update to `msortv()`.
Test Plan:
- Tagged several tasks with project X, a project without a board yet.
- Created the project X workboard.
- (Did not drag any tasks around on the project X board!)
- Viewed the board in "Natural" order.
This creates a view of the board where tasks are ordered by implicit/virtual/input order. The expectation, and "view" behavior of this board, is that this order is "newest on top".
- Edited one of the cards on the board, changing the title (don't reorder it!)
- Before: page state synchronized with cards in arbitrary/random/different order.
- After: page state synchronized with cards in the same order as before ("newest on top").
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T4900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20681
Summary:
Depends on D20320. Ref T12175. Ref T13074. Currently, when you move a card between columns, the internal transaction takes exactly one `afterPHID` or `beforePHID` and moves the card before or after the specified card.
This is a fairly strict interpretation and causes a number of practical issues, mostly because the user/client view of the board may be out of date and the card they're dragging before or after may no longer exist: another user might have moved or hidden it between the last client update and the current time.
In T13074, we also run into a more subtle issue where a card that incorrectly appears in multiple columns fatals when dropped before or after itself.
In all cases, a better behavior is just to complete the move and accept that the position may not end up exactly like the user specified. We could prompt the user instead:
> You tried to drop this card after card X, but that card has moved since you last loaded the board. Reload the board and try again.
...but this is pretty hostile and probably rarely/never what the user wants.
Instead, accept a list of before/after PHIDs and just try them until we find one that works, or accept a default position if none work. In essentially all cases, this means that the move "just works" like users expect it to instead of fataling in a confusing/disruptive/undesirable (but "technically correct") way.
(A followup will make the client JS send more beforePHIDs/afterPHIDs so this works more often.)
We could eventually add a "strict" mode in the API or something if there's some bot/API use case for precise behavior here, but I suspect none exist today or are (ever?) likely to exist in the future.
Test Plan:
- (T13074) Inserted two conflicting rows to put a card on two columns on the same board. Dropped one version of it underneath the other version. Before: confusing fatal. After: cards merge sensibly into one consistent card.
- (T12175) Opened two views of a board. Moved card A to a different column on the first view. On the second view, dropped card B under card A (still showing in the old column). Before: confusing fatal. After: card ended up in the right column in approximately the right place, very reasonably.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13074, T12175
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20321
Summary:
Depends on D20278. Ref T5474. This change creates some new empty objects that do nothing, and some new views for looking at those objects. There's no actual useful behavior yet.
The "Edit" controller is custom instead of being driven by "EditEngine" because I expect it to be a Herald-style "add new rules" UI, and EditEngine isn't a clean match for those today (although maybe I'll try to move it over).
The general idea here is:
- Triggers are "real" objects with a real PHID.
- Each trigger has a name and a collection of rules, like "Change status to: X" or "Play sound: Y".
- Each column may be bound to a trigger.
- Multiple columns may share the same trigger.
- Later UI refinements will make the cases around "copy trigger" vs "reference the same trigger" vs "create a new ad-hoc trigger" more clear.
- Triggers have their own edit policy.
- Triggers are always world-visible, like Herald rules.
Test Plan: Poked around, created some empty trigger objects, and nothing exploded. This doesn't actually do anything useful yet since triggers can't have any rule behavior and columns can't actually be bound to triggers.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T5474
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20279
Summary:
Ref T13216. Ref T13217. Depends on D19800. This fixes all of the remaining query warnings that pop up when you run "arc unit --everything".
There's likely still quite a bit of stuff lurking around, but hopefully this covers a big set of the most common queries.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit --everything`. Before change: lots of query warnings. After change: no query warnings.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13217, T13216
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19801
Summary:
Ref T10349. At HEAD, if you create a task //on a board//, it floats to the top correctly.
If you create a task elsewhere and tag it with the board, you were subject to the whims of the layout engine and it would generally end up on the bottom.
Instead, make the rules consistent so that "virtual" positions (of tasks which haven't been committed to a particular position yet) still float to the top.
Test Plan:
- Created tasks from a board.
- Created tasks from Maniphest, then looked at them on a board.
- Moved tasks around.
- In all cases, newly created tasks floated to the top.
- Sorted by natural and priority.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10349
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15276
Summary: Fixes T10316. Fixes T10311.
Test Plan:
- Create a project, create a milestone, go back to the parent, go to the workboard. Previously, fatal. Now, prompts you to create workboard.
- Create a project, create a milestone, create the parent workboard, put a task in the milestone's column, go to the milestone workboard. Previously, fatal. Now, prompts you to create workboard.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10311, T10316
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15232
Summary: Ref T4427. This kind of works.
Test Plan: {F1100578}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15221
Summary:
Fixes T7410.
- Adds a "Disable Workboard" action to the "Manage Backlog" menu.
- We'll probably move this somewhere else if/when that column gets too messy.
- Disabling a board hides it, prevents it from being recreated by non-editors, and hides the "Project (Backlog)" annotations.
- Resotring a board puts it back in pristine condition.
Test Plan:
- Disabled a board.
- Verified "(Backlog)" annotations vanished.
- Enabled a board.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T7410
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15215
Summary:
Ref T10010.
- Viewing an empty board with milestone columns did a meaningless edge query. Don't do that.
- When creating the first milestone of a parent, force the indexing engine to rematerialize it inline. This sets `hasMilestones` properly. Otherwise, the daemons may take some time to fix this in the indexer.
Test Plan:
- Viewed an empty board of a project with a milestone.
- Viewed a normal board.
- Created the first milestone of a project with a big queue of daemons, saw project state immediately fully reflect the project having milestones.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15206
Summary:
Ref T10010.
- Don't allow milestones to be reordered.
- Hide phantom subproject columns when reodrering.
- Don't allow subproject/milestone columns to be renamed.
- Force milestones to be ordered at the end, and in the correct order.
- Add some missing crumbs.
Test Plan: Reordered columns, renamed columns, made a new column, viewed column details.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15183
Summary:
Ref T10010. These aren't perfect but I think (?) they aren't horribly broken.
- When a project is a parent project, destroy (as far as the user can tell) any custom columns.
- When a project has milestones, automatically generate columns on the project's workboard (if it has a workboard).
- When you move tasks between milestones, add the proper milestone tag.
- When you move tasks out of milestones back into the backlog, add the proper parent project tag.
- (Plenty of UI / design stuff to adjust.)
Test Plan:
- Dragged stuff between milestone columns.
- Used a normal workboard.
- Wasn't able to find any egregiously bad cases that did anything terrible.
{F1088224}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15171
Summary: Ref T10010. This isn't totally comprehensive, and a lot of behaviors aren't testable (e.g., all the Javascript stuff) but at least covers the basic create/move/reorder operations.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15178
Summary: Ref T10010. This gets rid of the last dependency on the weird ColumnPositionQuery code.
Test Plan:
- Viewed workboards.
- Used batch editor.
- Created a new workboard.
- Dragged stuff around.
- Created new tasks into columns.
- Changed order from natural to priority, dragged things around.
- Switched filter to custom filter, "all tasks", etc.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15176
Summary:
Ref T10010. See D15174. This gets rid of the "actually apply the change" callsite and moves it to layout engine.
Next up is to make the board view use the layout engine, then throw away all the whack code in ColumnPositionQuery, then move forward with D15171.
Test Plan:
- Dragged tasks within a column.
- Dragged tasks between columns.
- Dragged tasks to empty columns.
- Created a task in a column.
- Swapped board to priority sort, dragged a bunch of stuff all over.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15175
Summary:
Ref T10010. This is a precursor to D15171, which I'll eventually rebuild on top of these changes.
Currently, ColumnPositionQuery does a lot of "column layout" stuff that's very similar to the Milestone/Subproject stuff that needs to happen in D15171. The current approach there ended up splitting this layout stuff across two unrelated classes (ColumnPositionQuery + BoardViewController), neither of which is a particularly great place to do it -- the Query is too low-level, and the Controller is too high-level.
Instead, introduce a new "LayoutEngine" which does all this layout stuff. Swap two of the four places that we query this stuff over to the new engine:
- "Project (Column)" on tasks.
- Transaction generation when moving cards.
These sites aren't swapped by this diff, but will be by the next one:
- Actually applying transactions.
- Main layout for boards (this could swap easily now, but applying transactions currently relies on position writes having taken place, so it can't swap until the other one swaps).
Once everything is swapped over, I should be able to add the D15171 logic to LayoutEngine instead of BoardViewController and end up with a cleaner approach overall.
One particularly benefit is that //looking// at a board won't do a bunch of position writes anymore, which wasn't a big deal, but which I was a bit uneasy with.
Test Plan:
- Viewed tasks that are on boards, saw column annotations in project list.
- Moved cards between columns on a board.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15174
