Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595.
To support a unified "Projects:" query across all applications, a future diff is going to add a set of "Edge Logic" capabilities to `PolicyAwareQuery` which write the required SELECT, JOIN, WHERE, HAVING and GROUP clauses for you.
With the addition of "Edge Logic", we'll have three systems which may need to build components of query claues: ordering/paging, customfields/applicationsearch, and edge logic.
For most clauses, queries don't currently call into the parent explicitly to get default components. I want to move more query construction logic up the class tree so it can be shared.
For most methods, this isn't a problem, but many subclasses define a `buildWhereClause()`. Make all such definitions protected and consistent.
This causes no behavioral changes.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit --everything`, which does a pretty through job of verifying this statically.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, hach-que, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T5595
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12453
Summary:
Ref T4807. This is probably a complete fix, but I'd be surprised if there isn't a little cleanup I missed.
When users drag tasks on a "natural"-ordered workboard, leave things where they put them.
This isn't //too// bad since a lot of the existing work is completely reusable (e.g., we don't need any new JS).
Test Plan:
- Dragged a bunch of stuff around, it stayed where I put it after dropped and when reloaded.
- Dragged stuff across priorities, no zany priority changes (in "natural" mode).
- Created new tasks, they show up at the top.
- Tagged new tasks, they show up at the top of backlog.
- Swapped to "priority" mode and got sorting and the old priority-altering reordering.
- Added tasks in priority mode.
- Viewed task transactions for correctness/sanity.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4807
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10182
Summary:
Ref T4807. This is an alternative to D10179. The problem these diffs solve is that I want to be able to reorder a column's positions without having to load the actual objects, but that's difficutl because two positions may have the same sequence number (and I think it's good that we allow that, since it makes a bunch of other stuff way easier).
Instead of using the object ID (e.g., the task ID) to reorder positions with the same sequence, use the position itself. This is a little easier, is less ambiguous if columns eventually have several types of objects, and produces a better behavior when old objects are freshly added to a board. For example, if you tag `T300` with `#project`, this new rule will push it to the top of "Backlog" while the old rule might have buried it deep. I think this behavior is desirable and more "natural".
When creating a group of new rows, we do order the batch by ID, so a group of freshly-tagged objects float to the top togehter in ID order. This seems like the most natural rule, too.
Test Plan:
- Loaded some boards with implicit objects on them (freshly tagged tasks) and saw rows create.
- Verified new rows created in the right order.
- Dragged some tasks around.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4807
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10180
Summary:
Fixes T5476. Using edges to store which objects are on which board columns ends up being pretty awkward. In particular, it makes T4807 very difficult to implement.
Introduce a dedicated `BoardColumnPosition` storage.
This doesn't affect ordering rules (T4807) yet: boards are still arranged by priority. We just read which tasks are on which columns out of a new table.
Test Plan:
- Migrated data, then viewed some boards. Saw exactly the same data.
- Dragged tasks from column to column.
- Created a task directly into a column.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5476
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10160
