archive/pillar
0
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 42 Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Use pypugjs for rendering #51156

New Issue
Closed
opened 2017-04-08 12:59:14 +02:00 by Francesco Siddi · 5 comments
Francesco Siddi commented 2017-04-08 12:59:14 +02:00
Copy Link

Currently we implement templates using pug and then use a gulp task to generate the HTML. By starting to use pypugjs :

  • designing and debugging templates becomes easier (debug display is closer to the source)
  • we simplify the pipeline by removing jade compilation (faster deploys and faster development preview)

This is a test run using index.html, extending layout.html (most of the current Blender Cloud pages have this level of complexity).

PUG

1st run:  0.13042s
next run: 0.00181s
next run: 0.00182s
next run: 0.00328s

HTML

1st run:  0.13313s
next run: 0.00177s
next run: 0.00234s
next run: 0.00393s

There seems to be no performance issue. The task would consist of:

  • renaming all .jade files to .pug and moving them from /src to /templates
  • introducing the new pypugjs requirement
  • updating the gulp script
  • updating the gitignore rules
Currently we implement templates using pug and then use a gulp task to generate the HTML. By starting to use [pypugjs ](https://github.com/matannoam/pypugjs): - designing and debugging templates becomes easier (debug display is closer to the source) - we simplify the pipeline by removing jade compilation (faster deploys and faster development preview) This is a test run using index.html, extending layout.html (most of the current Blender Cloud pages have this level of complexity). PUG ``` 1st run: 0.13042s next run: 0.00181s next run: 0.00182s next run: 0.00328s ``` HTML ``` 1st run: 0.13313s next run: 0.00177s next run: 0.00234s next run: 0.00393s ``` There seems to be no performance issue. The task would consist of: - renaming all .jade files to .pug and moving them from `/src` to `/templates` - introducing the new pypugjs requirement - updating the gulp script - updating the gitignore rules
Francesco Siddi self-assigned this 2017-04-08 12:59:14 +02:00
Francesco Siddi commented 2017-04-08 12:59:14 +02:00
Author
Copy Link

Changed status to: 'Open'

Changed status to: 'Open'
Francesco Siddi commented 2017-04-08 12:59:14 +02:00
Author
Copy Link

Added subscriber: @fsiddi

Added subscriber: @fsiddi
Francesco Siddi commented 2017-04-08 16:38:56 +02:00
Author
Copy Link

Added subscriber: @pablovazquez

Added subscriber: @pablovazquez
Francesco Siddi commented 2017-04-11 11:25:26 +02:00
Author
Copy Link

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Archived'

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Archived'
Francesco Siddi commented 2017-04-11 11:25:26 +02:00
Author
Copy Link

After some testing, this proved to be a failure. The lack of support for block elements inside of tags, combined with the lack of documentation and active support do not make this library suitable for Pillar.

After some testing, this proved to be a failure. The lack of support for block elements inside of tags, combined with the lack of documentation and active support do not make this library suitable for Pillar.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Priority::High
Priority::Low
Priority::Normal
Status::Archived
Status::Confirmed
Status::Resolved
Type::Bug
Type::Design
Type::Patch
Type::Report
Type::To Do
legacy project
Infrastructure: Websites
legacy project
Pillar
legacy project
Pillar Framework
legacy project
Pillar Website
No Label
Priority::Normal
Status::Archived
Type::Design
legacy project
Pillar
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
blender-admin
No Assignees Francesco Siddi
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: archive/pillar#51156
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?