import_curve.svg() ValueError: matrix does not have an inverse #102396
Labels
No Label
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Blender Cloud
Interest
Collada
Interest
Core
Interest
Documentation
Interest
Eevee & Viewport
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
Import and Export
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds, Tests & Devices
Interest
Python API
Interest
Rendering & Cycles
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Translations
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Module
Add-ons (BF-Blender)
Module
Add-ons (Community)
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: blender/blender-addons#102396
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
System Information
Operating system: Windows 10 / 20H2 OS Build 19042.1083
Graphics card: RTX 3060 Mobile
Blender Version
Broken: 3.3.1
Worked: (n/a)
Short description of error
Importing an SVG with
bpy.ops.import_curve.svg
results in an errorExact steps for others to reproduce the error
Using this file:
File:
Run this line in the Python console:
Could this use inverted_safe instead?
Added subscriber: @Krebs
Confirmed that this also fails in the File > Import > SVG path too.
Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Confirmed'
Added subscriber: @PratikPB2123
Added subscriber: @Sergey
Unfortunately, it is not as simple as simple use of
inverted_safe
. Using it will make it pushing degenerated matrix and poping it from the stack will not properly restore the state of the transformation stack.I am currently testing a different approach to the matrix stack which does not require inversion and multiplication in pop.
This issue was referenced by
a28c3f9cc0
Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Resolved'
Thanks for the quick fix! Looking forward to testing it out