Rigify generation broken on current master #53356
Labels
No Label
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Blender Cloud
Interest
Collada
Interest
Core
Interest
Documentation
Interest
Eevee & Viewport
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
Import and Export
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds, Tests & Devices
Interest
Python API
Interest
Rendering & Cycles
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Translations
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Module
Add-ons (BF-Blender)
Module
Add-ons (Community)
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: blender/blender-addons#53356
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
System Information
Ubuntu 14.04
Blender Version
Broken: current master (build from Nov 20th)
Worked: 2.79
Short description of error
Rigify generation broken on current master
Exact steps for others to reproduce the error
Works on 2.79
Changed status to: 'Open'
Added subscriber: @JulienDuroure
#53466 was marked as duplicate of this issue
#53423 was marked as duplicate of this issue
Added subscriber: @LucioRossi
Added subscriber: @JoshuaLeung
See blender/blender@a819ef65c0
The bbone properties for Ease In/Out were renamed (e.g.
bbone_in
->bbone_easein
), and there are now Rig Restpose (Bone/EditBone) vs Pose (PoseBone) versions of these. Drivers and editmode editing should use the restpose ones.NOTE: I started looking into fixing this, and quickly found that there were quite a few occurrences of this. So, I'll leave this for you guys to handle.
Added subscriber: @icappiello
Yes I confirm it's related to
a819ef65c0
It looks like already made rigs are not affected. The new bbone_easein takes in the same value as the bbone_in previously defined, so it's just a matter of patching Rigifyunfortunately now we have 2 bbone prop, one for edit and one for pose bones. The pose bones one is reset to 0 and this breaks compatibility with old rigs
Added subscriber: @Ebone
@LucioRossi: Could you explain how/why the rigs get broken if the setting found in the pose bone settings gets reset to 0? What exactly is the problem?
If it's just a matter of animation + drivers on old files not getting version patched to use the new properties (i.e. the settings don't work out of the box when loading old files), it's not such a big problem to fix. (While we haven't actually got version patching code that does this sort of thing anymore AFAIK, in the early 2.5 days we did have a script that could be used for easily patching files; it's also not too hard to add version patching code to fix these problems)
Or is it something else? For example, are there now problems deforming meshes if you just keep animating only the edit property and leaving the posemode one on 0 (as AFAIK, it should be ok just doing it that way?)
@Ebone: Thanks for the patched addon files.
@JoshuaLeung the problem is with the property name and fixing it in Rigify is straightforward.
As I mentioned in the concern to https://developer.blender.org/rBa819ef65c07131ddb203a55bd8dc4e3207130b64 the problem is with animations and drivers not pointing to the correct property anymore, and this is independent of Rigify.
This can be solved again - I guess - just changing the name of the property
Anyway, I don't know if patching is a good solution. Maybe good if the script is in the file loader, but It certainly is not if it's an overhead to all animators wanting to use 2.79a. The choice is up to blender coders though
Added subscriber: @EdHernandez
This issue was referenced by
1f2b515623
Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Resolved'