Following instructions in the manual and the result is different with the image in the example #99959
Labels
No Label
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Blender Cloud
Interest
Collada
Interest
Core
Interest
Documentation
Interest
Eevee & Viewport
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
Import and Export
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds, Tests & Devices
Interest
Python API
Interest
Rendering & Cycles
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Translations
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Module
Add-ons (BF-Blender)
Module
Add-ons (Community)
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: blender/blender-addons#99959
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
System Information
Operating system: macOS-10.15.7-x86_64-i386-64bit 64 Bits
Blender Version
Broken: version: 3.3.0 Alpha, branch: master, commit date: 2022-07-14 22:44, hash:
blender/blender@0e9367fc29
Addon Information
Name: Precision Drawing Tools (PDT) (1, 5, 2)
Author: @clockmender, @ermo
Short description of error
Followed instruction in the manual at this page
Worked Example - Building A Book Scanner
and at after the instruction in this part:
I got this image instead:
which is completely different from the image in the example:
https:*docs.blender.org/manual/en/dev/_images/addons_pdt_scan_3.png
Can whoever written the documentation please verify if they are getting the same result as referenced in the documentation? I'm expecting to have the SAME as result documented.
Exact steps for others to reproduce the error
Added subscriber: @hoanguk
Added subscribers: @clockmender, @ermo
The line in the manual:
Or Key vd,,0.04
Should read:
Or Key vd,,-0.04
Can some one with authority update that page please.
It works as intended with the cartesian coordinates set and using "Delta" button.
Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Confirmed'
This issue was referenced by blender/documentation@9433
Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Resolved'
In the process recreating this example, the book scanner, I have found a little error in this section:
the value
0,0.65,0.14 should be read as 0,0.065,0.14, the middle value should have an extra leading 0 (ie. divide by 10 more) and should be read as 0.065 and not 0.65 as documented
This leading to the whole command line should be changed from dd,0.65,0.14 to dd0,0.065,0.14
Please alter the documentation.
We need to alter the part that says:
Set Cartesian Coordinates to 0,0,65,0.14 to 0,0,065,0.14 as well....
And this of course:
This leading to the whole command line should be changed from dd,0.65,0.14 todd0,0.065,0.14
Can someone with authority to do this please make the changes, I do not have write authority here....
Thanks.
Good to see details in the manual being fixed.
Could you be more clear on all the necessary changes?
Note that it is recommended to create a patch showing these changes.
The manual SVN repository can be checkout through the link at https://developer.blender.org/diffusion/BM/
If I'm not mistaken, the file to be changed is:
{https://developer.blender.org/diffusion/BM/browse/trunk/blender_docs/manual/addons/3d_view/precision_drawing_tools/book_scanner.rst}
Yes, that is the correct file, lines 54 and 56 change 0.65 to 0.065, all three instances in those lines.
Thanks!
There is also a little mistake, though not so visible to readers, as they are reading from the HTML text, where the error is NOT so visible, but as a translator, documenter, you will notice this error, as you're running the command printed in the PDT's command line, it will create an error message, the line affecting is:
The value ei30 should include the last comma
,
as the ending of the command sequence, so it should be written asinstead.
Please also check and recapture screen images for PDT section if needed, for 3.3, as their UI has changed significantly. Quite a few button labels had changed.
Just to be pedantic about the keyboard sequence mentioned in this line:
There should be a "Enter" after the "Shift+D" and by the way, these keyboard sequences should be using format like
There is another instance of 'SHIFT+D' further down the document that needed to be set the same as well.
The reason to mention this is that when I use it myself the first time, I was stumbled for the sequence, after Shift+D I immediately did 'Ctrl+M, Y' and that did not produce anything.
Next, this sequence of action:
The selected vertex is still the old one, you need to instruct users to select the extruded vertex, or else the next extrude will be wrong.
A note about flakiness of the Redo and Undo. If you make a mistake and undo, this could force you to repeat from the beginning if you do not save the file after every step. I think with per instruction demanding accuracy as this module, each instruction should be saved and undo/redo-able. Try to run through the example and you will see what I meant.
You can use either Enter, or simply click the mouse button to activate these keyins, I think this should be covered in basic Blender operation, not here.... It is really up to those with authority to decide whether we need be this pedantic in an instruction to use a toolset like PDT. I think users will have a basic understanding of how Blender commands work prior to using this add-on, quite happy to be proven wrong tho....
Where is this mentioned in the guide to producing Blender Documentation please?
I do not agree with this comment.
The odd typo is one thing, I was under extreme time pressure to get this manual into Blender Docs at the time. If someone wants to re-write it all, I am happy with that too, but I don't have the authority to update Blender Docs.
Perhaps we should have all your comments, before proceeding with any changes, then agree the changes with @mano-wii before any more updates are undertaken, this piecemeal approach over many days is not efficient IMHO.