Remove unnecessary glossary entries #45894
Labels
No Label
Meta
Good First Issue
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
Eevee & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds, Tests & Devices
Module
Python API
Module
Rendering & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Information from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: blender/blender-manual#45894
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Some glossary entries seem unnecessary or contain explanations which should perhaps be elsewhere; e.g. tool descriptions.
Tool descriptions I've found in the glossary so far:
Subdivision Surface
Knife
Proportional Editing
Extrude
Others seem perhaps overly specific (I could not find any reference to any of these with a quick search):
Gouraud Shading
Phong
Doppler Effect
Are there any other glossary entries which perhaps should be in the glossary?
Do we have a solid definition of what should be a glossary term and what shouldn't?
Changed status to: 'Open'
Added subscriber: @gandalf3
Control Cage also seems rather localized
Added subscriber: @ideasman42
Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Resolved'
Committed rBM564
Kept Subdivision Surface but updated the description since it was too specific.
Also Kept: Gouraud & Phong, Shading are also common tems WRT computer graphics, however only Phong shows up in Blender's UI.
Should glossary entries be kept if they are not referenced anywhere in the manual?
Added subscriber: @GregZaal
No harm in it I think.
Might be nice to have a script that goes through the glossary and adds
:term:
directives to the first match of each term on every page in the manual. Though maybe that's not necessary and just makes things messy.