Follow Path constraint works only on curves with Cyclic U option activated #76009
Labels
No Label
Meta
Good First Issue
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
Eevee & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds, Tests & Devices
Module
Python API
Module
Rendering & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Information from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: blender/blender-manual#76009
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
System Information
Operating system: Windows-10-10.0.18362-SP0 64 Bits
Graphics card: GeForce GTX 1080/PCIe/SSE2 NVIDIA Corporation 4.5.0 NVIDIA 441.20
Blender Version
Broken: version: 2.82 (sub 7), branch: master, commit date: 2020-02-12 16:20, hash:
blender/blender@77d23b0bd7
Worked: (optional)
Short description of error
If the constraint is not set on fixed position the constrained object will stay at the start position even if the offset is on a different value.
The constraint will work fine if the curve is set to Cyclic U.
This may not be considered a bug, but the "Fixed position" option isn't really working as the name describes.
It is merely remapping the frames value to a range that goes from 0.0 to 1.0. This will cause a slide of the constrained object on the curve when the curve moves and it will not keep its parametric coordinates, it will just keep the position on the percentage of the length of the curve.
Exact steps for others to reproduce the error
For Cyclic U:
Create a Nurbs Curve
Create an Empty
Add a follow path constraint
Set the offset value to 50
in the curve option tab, under Active spline activate Cyclic U
Fixed position:
A simple way to recreate the issue is to create a curve with 6 control points, place the constrained object between the first and second control point and move the sixth control point. You will notice the constrained object moving even if the curve is not actually deforming in that area.
Added subscriber: @maumemoli
Added subscriber: @mano-wii
Could you provide a simple file showing the problem?
Added subscriber: @iss
Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Archived'
Please reffer to documentation before reporting: https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/dev/animation/constraints/relationship/follow_path.html
In first issue I would agree though that wording is quite bad, but it is correct still. Tooltip is also quite misleading.
At frame 1 you are at beginning of the curve. If you offset animation by +50 frames empty will correctly start moving from frame 51.
Regarding second issue, descriprion is quite clear. Tooltip seems to be fine as well.
I will close this report, because I can't see bug in actual behavior, and tag projects, so they can update description of property if they see this as something worth fixing
Added subscriber: @Imaginer
Offset:
I can confirm that when the curve's Cyclic U property is active the animation starts immediately from frame 1 as opposed to what's set in offset.
@iss This looks like a bug to me.
Fixed Position:
As far as I can tell this is working properly. The "Fixed Position" is defined by percentage, so it makes sense that the object changes position when the curve is edited (for example, made longer).
Sorry I must have misread report. In any case that is still not a bug IMO, because when curve is cyclic, motion paths will go from -infinity to +infinity.
Therefore offset is now really just "phase shift".
@iss
I should have gone through the documentation. Sorry for the rush bug report.
But still isn't the change of behavior still when the curve turns Cyclic considered a bug?
It would make more sense having the evaluation time parameter in the constraint itself instead of the curve.
I know this is not the place to make suggestions to improve the software, but having objects sliding on the curve and not having the option to keep them locked on the parameter it is kind of crippling for the rigging workflow.