VSE separate images increases file size abnormally #41086
Labels
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: blender/blender#41086
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
In official Blender 2.71, by spliting a strip with a sequence of 722 images with Separate images function bpy.ops.sequencer.images_separate(length=x)
the .blend file jumps from 600 Kb to something near 132 Mb, without any packed file.
It seems a bit exagerated compared to the same steps done in 2.70a, where it increases from 570 kb to 4.4 Mb, much more reasonable.
System Information
Scientific Linux (CentOS like)
Linux lajeado 2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jun 19 14:01:59 CDT 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Graphics card: 0f:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GT200GL [Quadro FX 3800] (rev a1)
Blender Version
Broken: 2.71 hash:
9337574
Worked: 2.70a
Short description of error
Exact steps for others to reproduce the error
Based on a (as simple as possible) attached .blend file with minimum amount of steps
Changed status to: 'Open'
Added subscriber: @AngeloBenetti
Added subscriber: @jta
Added subscriber: @mont29
I cannot reproduce that here (linux64), neither with official 2.71 nor current trunk, I’m always getting same results (6.8 Mo for about 150 images - which I found already rather high, tbh!).
Added subscriber: @Sergey
Please always attahc all files needed to reproduce the issue.
I can only think you've got really long sequence and separating it for a single frame, which leads to loads to individual strips. This would for sure bump file size dramatically.
@Sergey would you consider bump from 500k to 6.8M (from 1 strip to 150) the expected amount of increase mem? That would make about 40k per strip, sounds a bit high to me, tbh…
Also, I can have a look at that myself, if you want (just assign it to me in this case).
40K indeed looks a bit suspicious. Definitely worth checking. Please go ahead :)
Also guess "uncofirmed" should be removed now?
Found the culprit - we copy everything from the old sequence into each new ones… including the stripdata, which for image sequences is an array with one item per image!
Following patch fixes this in the simplest way possible, not sure it would be considered good enough for master, Sergey?
P93: #41086
This issue was referenced by
2e436173aa
Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Resolved'
Closed by commit
2e436173aa
.