Collection instance origins are set to (0,0,0) and can't be changed. #62003

Closed
opened 2019-02-27 06:01:46 +01:00 by Russell · 12 comments

System Information
Operating system: Win Pro 64
Graphics card: GTX 1050

Blender Version
Broken: b4db7d80f1

Short description of error
When instancing collections the origin point of the instance is always set to (0,0,0). There is no way to control the origin point of a collection before or after it's instanced.

Exact steps for others to reproduce the error

  1. Open new file - general.
  2. Move the cube to 10,10,10
  3. Create a new collection named Original Collection and place the cube in it.
  4. Add the collection to the scene as an instance. That instance will also be named Original Collection which leads to major confusion. In the outliner it will have an Original Collection nested below it. Maybe the usual .001 suffixes would help here.
  5. Expand the hierarchies in the outliner to tell what's what.
  6. The collection instance will have its cube at (10,10,10) but the origin of the collection is at (0,0,0) so it shows as not being moved at all. It would be nice if the new collection instance had its origin at the center of the cube but how do you go about doing that?
  7. Set the 3d cursor to 5,5,5.
  8. There are three things in the Outliner named Original Collection now. Hide the actual Original Collection if you can tell which one it is.
  9. Now, click on the Original Collection seemingly nested under itself. Then move the 3d cursor and set the origin. Nope that doesn't work.
  10. Ok, select the parent of the instance Original Collection and set the origin. Nope, that doesn't work.
  11. Right click on the parent and click Select Hierarchy, then set the origin. Yay, finally it works. Wait a second. Click on the cube and hit G. Seems we didn't set the origin but simply transformed it. The instanced cube just jumped to (15,15,15). The collection origin is still the same relative to the cube.
**System Information** Operating system: Win Pro 64 Graphics card: GTX 1050 **Blender Version** Broken: b4db7d80f18b **Short description of error** When instancing collections the origin point of the instance is always set to (0,0,0). There is no way to control the origin point of a collection before or after it's instanced. **Exact steps for others to reproduce the error** 1. Open new file - general. 2. Move the cube to 10,10,10 3. Create a new collection named Original Collection and place the cube in it. 4. Add the collection to the scene as an instance. That instance will also be named Original Collection which leads to major confusion. In the outliner it will have an Original Collection nested below it. Maybe the usual .001 suffixes would help here. 5. Expand the hierarchies in the outliner to tell what's what. 6. The collection instance will have its cube at (10,10,10) but the origin of the collection is at (0,0,0) so it shows as not being moved at all. It would be nice if the new collection instance had its origin at the center of the cube but how do you go about doing that? 7. Set the 3d cursor to 5,5,5. 8. There are three things in the Outliner named Original Collection now. Hide the actual Original Collection if you can tell which one it is. 9. Now, click on the Original Collection seemingly nested under itself. Then move the 3d cursor and set the origin. Nope that doesn't work. 10. Ok, select the parent of the instance Original Collection and set the origin. Nope, that doesn't work. 11. Right click on the parent and click Select Hierarchy, then set the origin. Yay, finally it works. Wait a second. Click on the cube and hit G. Seems we didn't set the origin but simply transformed it. The instanced cube just jumped to (15,15,15). The collection origin is still the same relative to the cube.
Author

Added subscriber: @Russ1642

Added subscriber: @Russ1642

Added subscribers: @mont29, @ZedDB

Added subscribers: @mont29, @ZedDB
Bastien Montagne was assigned by Sebastian Parborg 2019-02-27 14:02:58 +01:00

@mont29 bug or not?

@mont29 bug or not?

Added subscriber: @sebastian_k

Added subscriber: @sebastian_k

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Archived'

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Archived'

To me this doesnt sound like a bug, but like normal behavior.
The origin of a collection is always at 0,0,0. If you want to have the origin of the collection be at the same place as the object in your collection, you have to select the Cube, snap the cursor to the origin of the cursor and then go to the Collections Panel in object properties and choose "Set Offset from Cursor" in the little dropdown menu to the right.
If I try this here the collections work perfectly normal, the same way like in 2.79, so I would consider this not a bug.

To me this doesnt sound like a bug, but like normal behavior. The origin of a collection is always at 0,0,0. If you want to have the origin of the collection be at the same place as the object in your collection, you have to select the Cube, snap the cursor to the origin of the cursor and then go to the Collections Panel in object properties and choose "Set Offset from Cursor" in the little dropdown menu to the right. If I try this here the collections work perfectly normal, the same way like in 2.79, so I would consider this not a bug.
Author

Invalid. Seriously? Setting the origin transforms the collection. That's clearly a bug. Also having the origin be set in a completely different way than everything else is a bug as well. Don't just close this out. Set it to a lower priority but to call this behaviour Normal is an insult.

Invalid. Seriously? Setting the origin transforms the collection. That's clearly a bug. Also having the origin be set in a completely different way than everything else is a bug as well. Don't just close this out. Set it to a lower priority but to call this behaviour Normal is an insult.

Please provide a blendfile that demonstrates the bug then.

Please provide a blendfile that demonstrates the bug then.

Added subscriber: @brecht

Added subscriber: @brecht

The user interface here is quite poor. It would be best if the "Set Origin" operator also worked for collection instances, and if the collection origin would also be editable in the properties editor for objects that instance the collection.

But this kind of improvement is something we consider outside the scope of the bug tracker, as user feedback and feature requests:
https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Communication/Contact#User_Feedback_and_Requests

The user interface here is quite poor. It would be best if the "Set Origin" operator also worked for collection instances, and if the collection origin would also be editable in the properties editor for objects that instance the collection. But this kind of improvement is something we consider outside the scope of the bug tracker, as user feedback and feature requests: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Communication/Contact#User_Feedback_and_Requests

Added subscriber: @Michael-Drake

Added subscriber: @Michael-Drake

Removed subscriber: @Michael-Drake

Removed subscriber: @Michael-Drake
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#62003
No description provided.