bevel tool : Width type (Offset-Width-Depth) have no effect with Vertex Only #63759

Closed
opened 2019-04-20 12:59:48 +02:00 by brochard · 9 comments

System Information
Operating system: Linux-5.0.8-050008 64 Bits
Graphics card: GeForce GTX 660 NVIDIA 418.56

Blender Version
Broken: version: 2.80 (sub 57), branch: blender2.7, commit date: 2019-04-19 17:39, hash: bc8b884e53

In Edit Mode, when I use the bevel tool on a mesh (cube, cylinder, cone, plane for vertices only) all selected edges and vertices have a bevel which is modified by the width type.
If I select "Vertex Only", Offset-Widht-Depth of the Widht type have no effect on them.

I have the same thing in Objet or Edit Mode with the Bevel Modifier.

**System Information** Operating system: Linux-5.0.8-050008 64 Bits Graphics card: GeForce GTX 660 NVIDIA 418.56 **Blender Version** Broken: version: 2.80 (sub 57), branch: blender2.7, commit date: 2019-04-19 17:39, hash: `bc8b884e53` In Edit Mode, when I use the bevel tool on a mesh (cube, cylinder, cone, plane for vertices only) all selected edges and vertices have a bevel which is modified by the width type. If I select "Vertex Only", Offset-Widht-Depth of the Widht type have no effect on them. I have the same thing in Objet or Edit Mode with the Bevel Modifier.
Author

Added subscriber: @brochignac

Added subscriber: @brochignac

Added subscribers: @howardt, @Gvgeo-1

Added subscribers: @howardt, @Gvgeo-1

I can replicate the problem.
@howardt I see, you are working with bevel operator. Maybe you want to look this bug, too.

I can replicate the problem. @howardt I see, you are working with bevel operator. Maybe you want to look this bug, too.
Member

This is somewhere between a bug and a feature request. The width type was intended for, and explained by, its effect on the amount an edge is beveled. But I can try to think of what to do for vertex. Seems reasonably clear for depth type but less clear for width type.

This is somewhere between a bug and a feature request. The width type was intended for, and explained by, its effect on the amount an edge is beveled. But I can try to think of what to do for vertex. Seems reasonably clear for depth type but less clear for width type.

I'm not dev, just tinkering a bit. I was looking at the cube and thought, 'How was that missed? Looks easy enough"
But I can see the problem, now that you mention it.
For width, maybe, you can take half width from the axis you use for depth towards each point.
But... But... Never mind, it looks impossible to me now.

I looked at python. But there is no way, to disable options from there(while keeping percentage/offset).

At the very least I'm changing bug status to low priority.

I'm not dev, just tinkering a bit. I was looking at the cube and thought, 'How was that missed? Looks easy enough" But I can see the problem, now that you mention it. For width, maybe, you can take half width from the axis you use for depth towards each point. But... But... Never mind, it looks impossible to me now. I looked at python. But there is no way, to disable options from there(while keeping percentage/offset). At the very least I'm changing bug status to low priority.
Author

A new exemple with Ctrl-B on the vertex of a plane: the widht type is only Offset, the others (Widht or Depth) have no effect. And it is well.

  • profile 0.5 with 1 segment (or profile 0.25 and several segments), a chamfer,
  • profile 0.5 with several segments, give offset equal radius.

bevel_vertex_plane.png

It is different and more difficult with a vertex and 3 edges, like a cube's corner.
In fact, only the distance of the offset option is taken into account and this can be enough.

In addition, between the Ctrl + B and the release of the LMB (and the bevel's popup), the bevel options are displayed, and on which you can act with the keyboard.
But the displayed Width does not take into account the Unit Scale of the scene. I use the 0.001 factor to have a millimeter display and the displayed Width is multiplied by 1000 (factor 1.0).
The displayed Width in the bevel's popup (after the release of the LMB) is right.

A new exemple with Ctrl-B on the vertex of a plane: the widht type is only Offset, the others (Widht or Depth) have no effect. And it is well. - profile 0.5 with 1 segment (or profile 0.25 and several segments), a chamfer, - profile 0.5 with several segments, give offset equal radius. ![bevel_vertex_plane.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F6962149/bevel_vertex_plane.png) It is different and more difficult with a vertex and 3 edges, like a cube's corner. In fact, only the distance of the offset option is taken into account and this can be enough. In addition, between the Ctrl + B and the release of the LMB (and the bevel's popup), the bevel options are displayed, and on which you can act with the keyboard. But the displayed Width does not take into account the Unit Scale of the scene. I use the 0.001 factor to have a millimeter display and the displayed Width is multiplied by 1000 (factor 1.0). The displayed Width in the bevel's popup (after the release of the LMB) is right.

@howardt This kept coming to my head.
I believe I fixed it (it is working in my eyes).D4719
Is this wrong?

@howardt This kept coming to my head. I believe I fixed it (it is working in my eyes).[D4719](https://archive.blender.org/developer/D4719) Is this wrong?
George Vogiatzis self-assigned this 2019-04-22 10:59:33 +02:00

This issue was referenced by 3e780507bd

This issue was referenced by 3e780507bd613d2b7e2ca3de178bf8108dcae9bc
Member

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Resolved'

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Resolved'
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#63759
No description provided.