"Bake Action..." bakes wrong on flat curves #82210

Closed
opened 2020-10-29 08:52:21 +01:00 by Luciano Muñoz Sessarego · 13 comments

System Information
Operating system: Windows-10-10.0.18362-SP0 64 Bits
Graphics card: GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design/PCIe/SSE2 NVIDIA Corporation 4.5.0 NVIDIA 456.71

Blender Version
Broken: version: 2.92.0 Alpha, branch: master, commit date: 2020-10-27 22:14, hash: 024b65b5e5

Short description of error
When using Bake Action with step of 1 (2, 3 etc) if a curve has a part that isnt moving (where the value holds in say 1 for 10 frames), then it only gets a key on the first one and last keyframe instead of every frame

Exact steps for others to reproduce the error

Insert a key in the default cube.

Create a curve like this (with at least 1 flat area where the value doesnt change)

2020-10-29 07_44_35-Blender.png
In the 3d view, go to object > animation > bake action

Result obtained:
2020-10-29 07_48_03-Blender.png

Result expected:
2020-10-29 07_50_31-Blender.png

Thank you guys!, I understand if it was "intended" as a feature but that breaks the baking and we have the cleanup operators after all if we actually need this.

**System Information** Operating system: Windows-10-10.0.18362-SP0 64 Bits Graphics card: GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design/PCIe/SSE2 NVIDIA Corporation 4.5.0 NVIDIA 456.71 **Blender Version** Broken: version: 2.92.0 Alpha, branch: master, commit date: 2020-10-27 22:14, hash: `024b65b5e5` **Short description of error** When using Bake Action with step of 1 (2, 3 etc) if a curve has a part that isnt moving (where the value holds in say 1 for 10 frames), then it only gets a key on the first one and last keyframe instead of every frame **Exact steps for others to reproduce the error** Insert a key in the default cube. Create a curve like this (with at least 1 flat area where the value doesnt change) ![2020-10-29 07_44_35-Blender.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9121362/2020-10-29_07_44_35-Blender.png) In the 3d view, go to object > animation > bake action Result obtained: ![2020-10-29 07_48_03-Blender.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9121374/2020-10-29_07_48_03-Blender.png) Result expected: ![2020-10-29 07_50_31-Blender.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9121380/2020-10-29_07_50_31-Blender.png) Thank you guys!, I understand if it was "intended" as a feature but that breaks the baking and we have the cleanup operators after all if we actually need this.
Author
Member

Added subscriber: @LucianoMunoz

Added subscriber: @LucianoMunoz

Added subscriber: @iss

Added subscriber: @iss

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Archived'

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Archived'
Richard Antalik self-assigned this 2020-10-29 13:23:03 +01:00

Thanks for the report, but please use other channels for user feedback and feature requests: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Communication/Contact#User_Feedback_and_Requests

For more information on why this isn't considered a bug, visit: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Reference/Not_a_bug

Thanks for the report, but please use other channels for user feedback and feature requests: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Communication/Contact#User_Feedback_and_Requests For more information on why this isn't considered a bug, visit: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Reference/Not_a_bug
Author
Member

yeah i understand that, but is this INTENDED behaviour ? are you sure?

yeah i understand that, but is this INTENDED behaviour ? are you sure?
Author
Member

Let me guess it's running the clean channels operator after baking, should we just make this explicit and have a checkbox to "clean curves" ?
Explicit is better than implicit :)

Let me guess it's running the clean channels operator after baking, should we just make this explicit and have a checkbox to "clean curves" ? Explicit is better than implicit :)

Changed status from 'Archived' to: 'Confirmed'

Changed status from 'Archived' to: 'Confirmed'

In #82210#1044226, @LucianoMunoz wrote:
Let me guess it's running the clean channels operator after baking

Yes.

should we just make this explicit and have a checkbox to "clean curves" ?
Explicit is better than implicit :)

Also yes. but it's not bug technically.

I guess I can confirm if this have negative impact on your workflow and let module decide. It is easy to implement after all.

> In #82210#1044226, @LucianoMunoz wrote: > Let me guess it's running the clean channels operator after baking Yes. > should we just make this explicit and have a checkbox to "clean curves" ? > Explicit is better than implicit :) Also yes. but it's not bug technically. I guess I can confirm if this have negative impact on your workflow and let module decide. It is easy to implement after all.

Added subscriber: @aidankerridge

Added subscriber: @aidankerridge
Sybren A. Stüvel changed title from "Bake Action..." bakes wrong on flat curves. to "Bake Action..." bakes wrong on flat curves 2020-10-30 12:42:21 +01:00

Added subscriber: @dr.sybren

Added subscriber: @dr.sybren

This is indeed not a bug, but nevertheless it's something that ought to be fixed (see yesterday's meeting notes ).

This is indeed not a bug, but nevertheless it's something that ought to be fixed (see [yesterday's meeting notes](https://devtalk.blender.org/t/2020-10-29-animation-rigging-module/15933) ).

This issue was referenced by 5da05dd627

This issue was referenced by 5da05dd627869eb0cff81f74b6bbfd7875f86e51

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Resolved'

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Resolved'
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser Project (Legacy)
Interest
Asset System
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#82210
No description provided.