Data-block Selector Design Changes (latest iteration) #84669

Open
opened 2021-01-13 15:02:26 +01:00 by Julian Eisel · 14 comments
Member

NOTE: This task does not cover the search menu of the data-block selector. There were ideas for this in the past, but they are not covered here.

Motivation

This initially was motivated by the addition of library overrides. Data-block selectors need a way to show library override operations.

There are a few other issues the following proposal addresses:

  • Scalability: The current solution of adding little icon buttons next to the data-block name field doesn't scale well. It only works if there's a small number of operations. We need to be able to place more items for better data-block management. Especially with the introduction of library overrides.
  • Discoverability: It's not obvious what some of the icons do. They appear and disappear, but it's not clear why some are available at times and others not.
  • Unclear Status: Currently their library status (linked, indirectly linked, broken link, library override) isn't really clear.
  • Unusual behavior: Some of the icon buttons allow Shift or Ctrl clicking to invoke alternative behaviors. This is not a usual pattern in Blender.
  • Misleading/incorrect terms and icons: The current design mixes "Duplicate" and "New", as well as "Delete" and "Unlink". So it's unclear what a click on the duplicate-icon does for example.

There is a conflict here: Many of the data-block selectors have little space, but users want to see many things at once: Fake user status, user count, name with sufficient space for long ones, often used operations (duplicate, unlink), etc. And there needs to be access to a data-block search box and advanced operations.

Proposal

[TODO properly explain this] Screenshot 2021-01-08 at 02.08.14.png Screenshot 2021-01-08 at 02.26.25.png Screenshot 2021-01-08 at 02.07.34.png

Operations Menu

Necessary Changes

Remaining Issues

  • Space is still an issue. The proposed design may be an improvement in some regards, but only slightly reduces needed space.
  • For now, this design won't display the library status icon (linked, indirectly linked, broken link, overridden, is-asset). There is just too little space for this. What other ways could we communicate this?

Higher Level Issues

There are at least two higher level issues, which are not addressed in this proposal, but can be addressed in a more or less orthogonal way:

  • Fake user is an ancient concept that should probably go (see #61209). Once that is done we don't need to show the fake user status icon. Maybe we can show the library status icon instead then.
  • Data-block selector is "abused" for general data-block management, because there is no proper place for that. E.g. the data-block could visualize the data-block relations (e.g. see <2.5 OOPS schematic) and provide better tools for managing them. A data-block selector should really just be used for managing a simple data-block user.
NOTE: This task does **not** cover the search menu of the data-block selector. There were ideas for this in the past, but they are not covered here. ## Motivation This initially was motivated by the addition of library overrides. Data-block selectors need a way to show library override operations. There are a few other issues the following proposal addresses: * **Scalability**: The current solution of adding little icon buttons next to the data-block name field doesn't scale well. It only works if there's a small number of operations. We need to be able to place more items for better data-block management. Especially with the introduction of library overrides. * **Discoverability**: It's not obvious what some of the icons do. They appear and disappear, but it's not clear why some are available at times and others not. * **Unclear Status**: Currently their library status (linked, indirectly linked, broken link, library override) isn't really clear. * **Unusual behavior**: Some of the icon buttons allow Shift or Ctrl clicking to invoke alternative behaviors. This is not a usual pattern in Blender. * **Misleading/incorrect terms and icons**: The current design mixes "Duplicate" and "New", as well as "Delete" and "Unlink". So it's unclear what a click on the duplicate-icon does for example. There is a conflict here: Many of the data-block selectors have little space, but users want to see many things at once: Fake user status, user count, name with sufficient space for long ones, often used operations (duplicate, unlink), etc. And there needs to be access to a data-block search box and advanced operations. ## Proposal [TODO properly explain this] ![Screenshot 2021-01-08 at 02.08.14.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9577242/Screenshot_2021-01-08_at_02.08.14.png) ![Screenshot 2021-01-08 at 02.26.25.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9577245/Screenshot_2021-01-08_at_02.26.25.png) ![Screenshot 2021-01-08 at 02.07.34.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9577247/Screenshot_2021-01-08_at_02.07.34.png) **Operations Menu** **Necessary Changes** **Remaining Issues** * Space is still an issue. The proposed design may be an improvement in some regards, but only slightly reduces needed space. * For now, this design won't display the library status icon (linked, indirectly linked, broken link, overridden, is-asset). There is just too little space for this. What other ways could we communicate this? ## Higher Level Issues There are at least two higher level issues, which are not addressed in this proposal, but can be addressed in a more or less orthogonal way: * Fake user is an ancient concept that should probably go (see #61209). Once that is done we don't need to show the fake user status icon. Maybe we can show the library status icon instead then. * Data-block selector is "abused" for general data-block management, because there is no proper place for that. E.g. the data-block could visualize the data-block relations (e.g. see <2.5 OOPS schematic) and provide better tools for managing them. A data-block selector should really just be used for managing a simple data-block user.
Author
Member

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Confirmed'

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Confirmed'
Author
Member

Added subscriber: @JulianEisel

Added subscriber: @JulianEisel

This issue was referenced by 08ee5573a9

This issue was referenced by 08ee5573a92959c6739fb47541bdd20d1e72306b
Member

Added subscriber: @zanqdo

Added subscriber: @zanqdo
Contributor

Added subscriber: @RedMser

Added subscriber: @RedMser

Added subscriber: @hadrien

Added subscriber: @hadrien

If indeed the fake user is on its way out, then the user count can be overlaid on top of the datablock icon on the left, and the duplicate button can be moved to the dropdown menu, at it is arguably less essential than the unlink button.

If indeed the fake user is on its way out, then the user count can be overlaid on top of the datablock icon on the left, and the duplicate button can be moved to the dropdown menu, at it is arguably less essential than the unlink button.

Added subscriber: @APEC

Added subscriber: @APEC

Additional icon near the material name only distract attention IMHO.
Why can't it be like this?
1 user.png
Manu users.png
Try large number in shield icon "25" for example, it become unreadable.
Manu users2.png

Additional icon near the material name only distract attention IMHO. Why can't it be like this? ![1 user.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9585672/1_user.png) ![Manu users.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9585677/Manu_users.png) Try large number in shield icon "25" for example, it become unreadable. ![Manu users2.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9585703/Manu_users2.png)
Contributor

Added subscriber: @Gilberto.R

Added subscriber: @Gilberto.R
Contributor

@APEC looks weird

@APEC looks weird

@Gilberto.R
agree, but we need numbers somewhere and in shield not enough space for large numbers.

@Gilberto.R agree, but we need numbers somewhere and in shield not enough space for large numbers.
Member

Added subscriber: @Imaginer

Added subscriber: @Imaginer
Member

@APEC I had some thoughts about combining the shield and user count, and not having enough space and using the tooltip to supplement it in this post in devtalk: https://devtalk.blender.org/t/redesigned-data-block-selector-feedback-thread/16691/67

@APEC I had some thoughts about combining the shield and user count, and not having enough space and using the tooltip to supplement it in this post in devtalk: https://devtalk.blender.org/t/redesigned-data-block-selector-feedback-thread/16691/67
Philipp Oeser removed the
Interest
User Interface
label 2023-02-10 09:23:46 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
8 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#84669
No description provided.