Motion tracking - locking by "L" key is not centering view. #85535

Closed
opened 2021-02-11 04:02:48 +01:00 by Gad · 10 comments

System Information
Operating system: Windows 10
Graphics card: RTX SU2070

Blender Version
Broken: 2.93.0 Alpha
Worked: 2.91.2

Short description of error
Pressing "L" button is not snapping view into center of the selected tracking point. (pressing on "Lock to Selection" button is snapping like before)

Exact steps for others to reproduce the error
HWKeXynYD3.gif

**System Information** Operating system: Windows 10 Graphics card: RTX SU2070 **Blender Version** Broken: 2.93.0 Alpha Worked: 2.91.2 **Short description of error** Pressing "L" button is not snapping view into center of the selected tracking point. *(pressing on "Lock to Selection" button is snapping like before)* **Exact steps for others to reproduce the error** ![HWKeXynYD3.gif](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9784329/HWKeXynYD3.gif)
Author

Added subscriber: @Gadas

Added subscriber: @Gadas

Added subscriber: @sebastian_k

Added subscriber: @sebastian_k

You are right, this is different than before. But this is not really bug, but rather a change in behavior. Lock to Selection now also works in Masking, where it locks the view to the selected markers, but not with the completely broken behavior as in 2.91 and before, but rather in a way that actually works. Part of this change is that the view follows the active selection, but without centering the view. That way it is less jumpy and less distracting.

You are right, this is different than before. But this is not really bug, but rather a change in behavior. Lock to Selection now also works in Masking, where it locks the view to the selected markers, but not with the completely broken behavior as in 2.91 and before, but rather in a way that actually works. Part of this change is that the view follows the active selection, but without centering the view. That way it is less jumpy and less distracting.
Author

In #85535#1110220, @sebastian_k wrote:
You are right, this is different than before. But this is not really bug, but rather a change in behavior. Lock to Selection now also works in Masking, where it locks the view to the selected markers, but not with the completely broken behavior as in 2.91 and before, but rather in a way that actually works. Part of this change is that the view follows the active selection, but without centering the view. That way it is less jumpy and less distracting.

Roger that, but will be there a setting in preferences or in clip display to set the jumpy method back?
I've used to this type of behavior and in my opinion it's pretty handy, because instantly we have centered tracker/trackers.
image.png

> In #85535#1110220, @sebastian_k wrote: > You are right, this is different than before. But this is not really bug, but rather a change in behavior. Lock to Selection now also works in Masking, where it locks the view to the selected markers, but not with the completely broken behavior as in 2.91 and before, but rather in a way that actually works. Part of this change is that the view follows the active selection, but without centering the view. That way it is less jumpy and less distracting. Roger that, but will be there a setting in preferences or in clip display to set the jumpy method back? I've used to this type of behavior and in my opinion it's pretty handy, because instantly we have centered tracker/trackers. ![image.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9792238/image.png)
Member

Added subscriber: @lichtwerk

Added subscriber: @lichtwerk
Member

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Needs Developer To Reproduce'

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Needs Developer To Reproduce'
Member

@sebastian_k : if you think this is something that does not need any further ironing, please feel free to close.

To me though it seems a bit inconsitent though that we are "wanting" the jump when using the lock icon button (the offest gets zeroed, see rna_SpaceClipEditor_lock_selection_update) and in contrast dont want the jump when using the shortcut (see lock_selection_toggle)?

Relevant commit: 66f8835f9c

@sebastian_k : if you think this is something that does not need any further ironing, please feel free to close. To me though it seems a bit inconsitent though that we are "wanting" the jump when using the lock icon button (the offest gets zeroed, see `rna_SpaceClipEditor_lock_selection_update`) and in contrast dont want the jump when using the shortcut (see `lock_selection_toggle`)? Relevant commit: 66f8835f9c

Added subscriber: @Sergey

Added subscriber: @Sergey

Changed status from 'Needs Developer To Reproduce' to: 'Archived'

Changed status from 'Needs Developer To Reproduce' to: 'Archived'

This is an intentional change which was done as a part of solution to jumpy view when performing various operations while Lock-to-Selection is enabled. I don't think it should be an option to restore old behavior, as the old behavior should be achievable by pressing . after L.

There is one annoyance still: the option from the tool bar will cause jump. Ideally behavior between this option and shortcut will be the same.But currently it is not very clear how this can be implemented.

I did document the change in the release notes: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Reference/Release_Notes/2.93/VFX#Motion_tracking
The behavior of toolbar will be consistent with shortcut shortly.

This is an intentional change which was done as a part of solution to jumpy view when performing various operations while Lock-to-Selection is enabled. I don't think it should be an option to restore old behavior, as the old behavior should be achievable by pressing `.` after `L`. There is one annoyance still: the option from the tool bar will cause jump. Ideally behavior between this option and shortcut will be the same.But currently it is not very clear how this can be implemented. I did document the change in the release notes: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Reference/Release_Notes/2.93/VFX#Motion_tracking The behavior of toolbar will be consistent with shortcut shortly.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#85535
No description provided.