Fix #100718: NLA Hold Forward Inconsistency #107281
|
@ -989,8 +989,21 @@ NlaEvalStrip *nlastrips_ctime_get_strip(ListBase *list,
|
|||
/* loop over strips, checking if they fall within the range */
|
||||
for (strip = strips->first; strip; strip = strip->next) {
|
||||
/* Check if current time occurs within this strip. */
|
||||
if (IN_RANGE_INCL(ctime, strip->start, strip->end) ||
|
||||
(strip->flag & NLASTRIP_FLAG_NO_TIME_MAP)) {
|
||||
|
||||
/* This block leads to the Action Track and non-time-remapped tweak strip evaluation to respect
|
||||
* the extrapolation modes. If in_range, these two tracks will always output NES_TIME_WITHIN so
|
||||
* fcurve extrapolation isn't clamped to the keyframe bounds. */
|
||||
bool in_range = IN_RANGE_INCL(ctime, strip->start, strip->end);
|
||||
if (strip->flag & NLASTRIP_FLAG_NO_TIME_MAP) {
|
||||
if (ELEM(strip->extendmode, NLASTRIP_EXTEND_HOLD)) {
|
||||
|
||||
in_range = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (ELEM(strip->extendmode, NLASTRIP_EXTEND_HOLD_FORWARD)) {
|
||||
in_range = ctime >= strip->start;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (in_range) {
|
||||
/* this strip is active, so try to use it */
|
||||
estrip = strip;
|
||||
side = NES_TIME_WITHIN;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Can't this just be coded like this? I don't see the need for
ELEM()
here.