Incorrect assumptions by the decision makers leading to bad decisions #235
Labels
No Label
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Reviewed
Confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
Reviewed
Invalid
Reviewed
Won't Fix
Status
Abandoned
Status
Blocked
Status
Need More Info
Type
Breaking
Type
Documentation
Type
Enhancement
Type
Feature
Type
Report
Type
Security
Type
Suggestion
Type
Testing
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: infrastructure/extensions-website#235
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Details:
Your decision makers incorrectly assumed behavior of an add-on, and set the status of the extension based on incorrect assumptions of behavior.
or a screen recording if you describe a problem with an interaction
Check the attached screenshot, they are just incorrect entirely.
https://extensions.blender.org/approval-queue/little-arrows/
I would expect the people making decisions about an add-ons viability to actually take a moment to try the add-on before making incorrect assumptions.