infrastructure/extensions-website
4
8
Fork 10
Code Issues 19 Pull Requests 2 Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Ratings: Implement replies #64

New Issue
Closed
opened 2024-03-25 14:27:00 +01:00 by Pablo Vazquez · 8 comments
Pablo Vazquez commented 2024-03-25 14:27:00 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Allow extension creators to reply to ratings/reviews.

The system underneath apparently already allows it, judging by the is_reply property of ratings.

Allow extension creators to reply to ratings/reviews. The system underneath apparently already allows it, judging by the `is_reply` property of ratings.
Pablo Vazquez added the
Type
Enhancement
Priority
Normal
 labels 2024-03-25 14:27:01 +01:00
Oleg-Komarov self-assigned this 2024-06-10 15:06:44 +02:00
Oleg-Komarov commented 2024-06-10 15:13:14 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

I am assuming that this feature means implementing a single reply from maintainer to a given rating, not supporting a discussion thread in ratings, i.e. a rating reply can't be replied to.

I am assuming that this feature means implementing a single reply from maintainer to a given rating, not supporting a discussion thread in ratings, i.e. a rating reply can't be replied to.
Pablo Vazquez commented 2024-06-10 15:19:06 +02:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

I am assuming that this feature means implementing a single reply from maintainer to a given rating, not supporting a discussion thread in ratings, i.e. a rating reply can't be replied to.

Yes. So for example in case of a bad review the developer can explain or ask them to update because they fixed the issue or something like that. But no thread. We don’t want it to turn into a Q&A or support channel.

> I am assuming that this feature means implementing a single reply from maintainer to a given rating, not supporting a discussion thread in ratings, i.e. a rating reply can't be replied to. Yes. So for example in case of a bad review the developer can explain or ask them to update because they fixed the issue or something like that. But no thread. We don’t want it to turn into a Q&A or support channel.
👍 1
Oleg-Komarov commented 2024-06-10 19:32:34 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

@pablovazquez or @martonlente could you please help me with rating reply display:

that's what I've done so far, and I don't like it too much:
image

the relevant code is here:
https://projects.blender.org/infrastructure/extensions-website/src/branch/rating-reply/ratings/templates/ratings/components/rating.html#L55-L71

feel free to commit to that branch

also you might want to improve the reply form itself: https://projects.blender.org/infrastructure/extensions-website/src/branch/rating-reply/ratings/templates/ratings/ratingreply_form.html

@pablovazquez or @martonlente could you please help me with rating reply display: that's what I've done so far, and I don't like it too much: ![image](/attachments/5f56dd7a-693b-435d-a89b-46ce6c87a7a2) the relevant code is here: https://projects.blender.org/infrastructure/extensions-website/src/branch/rating-reply/ratings/templates/ratings/components/rating.html#L55-L71 feel free to commit to that branch also you might want to improve the reply form itself: https://projects.blender.org/infrastructure/extensions-website/src/branch/rating-reply/ratings/templates/ratings/ratingreply_form.html
image.png
46 KiB
👀 1
Márton Lente commented 2024-06-10 22:29:51 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

Nice addition, and I think it's a good starting point!

I can think of e.g. a nested box style display, similar to what we do on Studio, for example here, with some refinements. (Since there's only going to be one reply if any, we can make its design more attached / refined.)

If it's what we want, the input could also be moved to the rating box. This would also work if we want to make the single reply editable later. What do you think?

Nice addition, and I think it's a good starting point! I can think of e.g. a nested box style display, similar to what we do on Studio, for example [here](https://studio.blender.org/films/gold/gallery/?asset=7106#comment-12842), with some refinements. (Since there's only going to be one reply if any, we can make its design more attached / refined.) If it's what we want, the input could also be moved to the rating box. This would also work if we want to make the single reply editable later. What do you think?
Oleg-Komarov commented 2024-06-11 11:17:13 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

This would also work if we want to make the single reply editable later.

Yes, I think that's a good way to approach it.
Even if we don't implement inline editing and open a separate form page, making it look the same on different pages is good.

Regarding the actual style - I think nested box should work well, but I don't have a strong opinion on this either way.

> This would also work if we want to make the single reply editable later. Yes, I think that's a good way to approach it. Even if we don't implement inline editing and open a separate form page, making it look the same on different pages is good. Regarding the actual style - I think nested box should work well, but I don't have a strong opinion on this either way.
👍 1
Márton Lente commented 2024-06-11 11:50:47 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

Thanks for the feedback! I added some simple tweaks and 'normalization' what I found achievable within the templates' architecture:

  • The reply item display could be a simple nested box, with no avatar displayed, as it always belongs to the same user (author).
  • The reply form is appended to the review item in subject coming from ratings/components/rating.html, so it can't be easily nested, but maybe it's better like below with an improved layout.

ratings-replies-ui-1-min.jpeg
ratings-replies-ui-2-min.jpeg

Thanks for the feedback! I added some simple tweaks and 'normalization' what I found achievable within the templates' architecture: - The reply item display could be a simple nested box, with no avatar displayed, as it always belongs to the same user (author). - The reply form is appended to the review item in subject coming from `ratings/components/rating.html`, so it can't be easily nested, but maybe it's better like below with an improved layout. ![ratings-replies-ui-1-min.jpeg](/attachments/8ef6ee91-23b1-4616-a7ae-f9a2720d34d8) ![ratings-replies-ui-2-min.jpeg](/attachments/a6a287b5-c2ac-41ff-a334-122235a4e9ae)
ratings-replies-ui-1-min.jpeg
24 KiB
ratings-replies-ui-2-min.jpeg
19 KiB
Oleg-Komarov commented 2024-06-11 12:13:12 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

Thanks, this looks good! I'll proceed with this for now, and we can get back to this once we decide to extend the features.

Thanks, this looks good! I'll proceed with this for now, and we can get back to this once we decide to extend the features.
Oleg-Komarov commented 2024-06-11 12:41:04 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

Deployed in production.

Deployed in production.
🎉 1
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels   
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
The priority is low

  
Priority
Normal
The priority is medium

  
Reviewed
Confirmed
Issue has been confirmed

  
Reviewed
Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists

  
Reviewed
Invalid
Invalid issue

  
Reviewed
Won't Fix
This issue won't be fixed

  
Status
Abandoned
Somebody has started to work on this but abandoned work

  
Status
Blocked
Something is blocking this issue or pull request

  
Status
Need More Info
Feedback is required to reproduce issue or to continue work

  
Type
Breaking
Breaking change that won't be backward compatible

  
Type
Documentation
Documentation changes

  
Type
Enhancement
Improve existing functionality

  
Type
Feature
New functionality

  
Type
Report
Something is not working

  
Type
Security
This is security issue

  
Type
Suggestion
New ideas and proposals

  
Type
Testing
Issue or pull request related to testing

No Label
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Reviewed
Confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
Reviewed
Invalid
Reviewed
Won't Fix
Status
Abandoned
Status
Blocked
Status
Need More Info
Type
Breaking
Type
Documentation
Type
Enhancement
Type
Feature
Type
Report
Type
Security
Type
Suggestion
Type
Testing
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Oleg-Komarov
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: infrastructure/extensions-website#64
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?