- CA, USA
-
Py Coder / Technical Artist - heavy on the technical.
Enjoys solving complex problems for fun.
- Joined on
2013-03-05
can we just merge this and close it into blender/blender#112150 ??
this will restore our ability to use a modal operator to interact with sim data?
@ideasman42 / py module owner - do we not want I/O from python to simulations?
a feature was removed that was working between versions without discussion - this is a regression*
I have a resolution - perhaps only use evaluated attributes if the evaluated object is…
For more information on why this isn't considered a bug, visit: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Reference/Not_a_bug
functionality that existed was removed.
it was a bug*
I had been using a mode]al operator to using mouse / keyboard / joysticks to interact with a running simulation
I can't interact with the sim in py at all now without using a second mesh /…
Since input is not wrapped - I wrapped it myself and now that is gone.
now we have no way to interact with a running sim in a modal operator (I guess we can set inputs on another mesh - but I…
in a sim - the evaluated data from this frame becomes the initial values for the next frame @mod_moder
to interact with running simulation using a modal operator or to use py to basically run a sim yourself and cache it.
I use UPBGE at the moment instead of a modal operator but the concept is…
@iss can we poke the simulation module*
space bar to start sim - click modal operator - left click to push - 'Run' will appear in bottom of screen when it 'pushes'
the cube is a single vertex on the scene (not the empty)
here it is working in LTS 3.6
can each editor 'own' a vec2 'offset' and the default is 0,0 ?
There are settings for number of samples, As well as ssgi "scale" and there is some settings for ssr as well,
Basically - when 'Stick' and 'hit index' are set, hit position and local etc should all be calculated?
what am I doing wrong?
sys info*