Frame nodes still have the "hidden" flag like all other nodes, but this
has to be ignored during resizing. width/height range for the frame
nodes must be unlimited for this to work correctly.
This makes it easier for finding the active or first selected channel
(where actual data channels need to be favoured over expanders - which come
first), as previously, long switch statements were needed everytime.
Previously mesh objects were created for individual visible stroke segments (recalling that
a stroke may consist of alternate visible and invisible segments). This could result in an
excessive memory consumption in stroke rendering when strokes are composed of many
short visible segments (for instance by means of dashed lines and/or blueprint geometry
modifiers).
Now mesh objects represent individual strokes instead of stroke segments, which tends to
reduce the number of generated mesh objects by an order of magnitude.
Code with contribution from Brecht Van Lommel (he wrote the
bake_differentials actually ;)
Reviewers: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D510
Show that modifier may not be supported in dyntopo rather than sculpt
mode in general. This is useful information since users may confuse the
two. Multires for instance is surely supported in sculpt mode, but not
in dyntopo.
Warn when a modifier does not support optimal drawing and mask/hidden
parts display.
User report was that hidden parts became visible after adding a new
modifier subdivision. Subdivision was added with the Ctrl+number keys.
First part of the fix was to make sure we add a multires instead of the
subsurf modifier in sculpt mode with the PageUp/Down Ctrl+number keys.
We can't really stop users from having added a subsurf modifier already.
We could be "smart" and convert subsurf to mulrires upon entering sculpt
mode maybe but that can easily backfire - or users may actually want
that. For now, just warn that the modifier won't support Hiding/Masking
and optimal drawing.
Multires did not support hiding in zero level. It's a case of PBVH not
being used in drawing due to code reporting active modifiers being used.
However multires level zero can be treated as effectively no modifier
and we can use mesh PBVH.
Now that Freestyle employs a separate Main, this workaround is no longer necessary.
Reviewers: sergey
Reviewed By: sergey
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D513
It seems that since the changes to how new NLA strips are handled, accumulating
these in a temporary buffer and then trying to combine the results didn't
work that great anymore.
This uses a different operator than the other time editors (as it needs to support
the setting of the value-cursor too), so the changes here didn't get propagated through.
This patch removes the limitations on the number of action layers in the BGE.
BL_ActionManager currently uses a fixed array to keep track of the action layers. This patch replaces the fixed array with a map which allows for dynamic allocation of action layers. Layers (map items) are automatically removed on BL_ActionManager's update function. The maximum number of layers is roughly the value of a short. Backwards functionality is maintained and there are no changes to the Python API.
Task Discussion:
https://developer.blender.org/T39572
Author: Kevin Ednalino
Reviewers: moguri
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D491
data.
Saving a file with a new blender node that uses bNode->storage data and
then loading that in an older version will make the node undefined, but
still retain the original type identifier (in case it is defined later).
If the file is then saved over and loaded again in the newer version,
where the node type is defined, it won't have a valid storage struct.
To handle such cases gracefully, check if storage data is expected but
doesn't exist when initializing node types. User then at least get a
chance of fixing the problem manually.
Suggested fix by @brecht.
As reported by ZanQdo on IRC, the bend modifier's "angle" property had a range
of +/- 572.95 degrees (equivalent to 10 radians). From the looks of things, this
was simply something overlooked when doing degrees to radians conversions. Now
it has a range of +/- 180 degrees.
