This reuses the Cycles regression test code to also work for OpenGL UI drawing.
We launch Blender with a bunch of .blend files, take a screenshot and compare
it with a reference screenshot, and generate a HMTL report showing the failed
tests and their differences.
For Cycles we keep small reference renders to compare to in svn, but for OpenGL
developers currently have to generate the references manually. How to use:
* WITH_OPENGL_DRAW_TESTS=ON in CMake
* BLENDER_TEST_UPDATE=1 ctest -R opengl_draw
* .. make code changes ..
* ctest -R opengl_draw
* open build_dir/tests/opengl_draw/report.html
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3064
Once 'losing lib' issue is fixed (in previous commit), we have new issue
that this could lead to several copies of the same linked data-block in
.blend file. Which is not good. At all.
So had to add a GHash-based check in libraries reading code to ensure we
only load a same ID from a same lib once.
The issue was that when a same lib was found several times in loaded
.blend, we'd only keep the first occurence. But since Blender expects
next data-blocks to belong to last found library, we could actually
be adding data-blocks assigned to copies of the duplicated lib to
another, totally unrelated lib.
Those data-blocks were then obviously not found when actually loading
libs content, and lost.
Note that this only fix one part of the issue, current code can
generate several copies of same linked data-block now, will fix in
another commit.
While the script should be using INVOKE_PREVIEW for operators in clip view,
window manager was lacking some switch statements.
Thanks Brecht fore review!
- Use BLI_threadpool_ prefix for (deprecated)
thread/listbase API.
- Use BLI_thread as prefix for other functions.
See P614 to apply instead of manually resolving conflicts.
- When returning the number of items in a collection use BLI_*_len()
- Keep _size() for size in bytes.
- Keep _count() for data structures that don't store length
(hint this isn't a simple getter).
See P611 to apply instead of manually resolving conflicts.
This is kind of doesn't matter where macro itself is defined.
We should stick to the following:
- If some macro is actually more an inline function, follow regular
function name conventions.
- If macro is a macro, type it in capitals. Use module prefix if that
helps readability or it if helps avoiding accidents.
This completes twist feature, which is now possible to also control by
texture. Since textures can not easily contain negative values as well,
same trick with 0.5 neutral as vertex groups is used.
All in all, this twist features allows to do following things.
Original hair:
{F2287535}
Hair with scientifically calculated twist value of 0.5:
{F2287540}
And we can also twist braids in opposite directions dependent on left/right
side:
{F2287548}
The idea is to give a control over direction of twist, and maybe amount of
twist as well. More concrete example: make braids on left and right side of
character head to be twisting opposite directions.
Now, tricky part: we need some negative values to flip direction, but weights
can not be negative. So we use same trick as displacement map and tangent normal
maps, where 0.5 is neutral, values below 0.5 are considered negative and values
above 0.5 are considered positive.
It allows to have children hair to be twisted around parent curve, which is
quite an essential feature when creating hair braids.
There are currently two controls:
- Number of turns around parent children.
- Influence curve, which allows to modify "twistness" along the strand.
This isn't supported since there are subsequent reads to all point coordinates
after modification started.
Probably we need to create a temp copy of point, but that's like extra CPU
ticks.
It seems to be useful still in cases where the particle are distributed in
a particular order or pattern, to colorize them along with that. This isn't
really well defined, but might as well avoid breaking backwards compatibility
for now.
This is like the only way to add variety to hair which is created
using simple children. Used here for the hair.
Maybe not ideal, but the time will show.
Burley SSS uses a bit of strange thing where the albedo and closure weight are
different, which makes the subsurface color act a bit like a subsurface radius
indirectly by the way the Burley SSS profile works.
This can't work for random walk SSS though, and it's not clear to me that this
is actually a good idea since it's really the subsurface radius that is supposed
to control this. For now I'll leave Burley SSS working the same to not break
backwards compatibility.
This can be very slow if it contains a big texture, and it's not
necessarily setup in a useful way anyway, and materials can be used
in multiple scenes.
