Can't say enough how much I hate those proxies... their duality (sharing
some aspects of both direct *and* indirect users) is a nightmare to handle. :(
It wasn't using old immediate mode, but was using
- client vertex arrays (obsolete)
- quads (obsolete)
- state attrib stack (obsolete)
- polygon mode (still allowed, but gross)
Nothing happen yet when it's supposed to insert the collection into
another one, that part will be handled by @dfelinto.
See gif for demo of how it works UI wise: {F500337}
Also fixed off-by-one error in utility function.
There are now only referenced in:
* drawobject.c
* particle_edit.c
* space_image.c (a single case to be handled on workspace branch)
* rigidbody_constraint.c (to be handled in the following commit)
Not really happy of per-pool threads limit, need to find better
approach to that. But at least it's possible to get rid of half
of the nastyness here by removing getter which was only used in
an assert statement.
That piece of code was already well-tested and this code becomes
obsolete in the new depsgraph and does no longer exists in blender
2.8 branch.
There were some issues with how we store outliner tree elements:
Apparently the only removable elements have been data-blocks so far.
When recreating the TreeElements, their TreeStoreElem instances were
mainly identified by their ID pointer. However non-data-blocks mostly
depend on an index. For collections, such an index isn't a reliable
measure though if we want to allow removing items. Depending on it for
identifying the TreeStoreElem instance would cause some quite noticeable
glitches (wrong highlights, two elements sharing highlight, etc).
For now I've solved that by actually removing the TreeStoreElem that
represents the removed element. A little limitation of this is that
after undoing the removal, some information might get lost, like
flags to store selection, or opened/closed state.
A better solution that would also fix this issue would be having a real
unique identifier for each non-data-block element, like an idname or even
its data-pointer. Not sure if we can get those to work reliable with
file read/write though, would have to investigate...
Also added a general Outliner tree traversal utility.
Based on the previous overlay shader from merwin.
This shader takes care of clipped vertex cases and do all edit mode face info in one pass (except face centers).
As the shading is done one the triangle itself the visual can't go beyond the surface of the mesh. That leads to half displayed edges on the outline of the mesh.
This problem can be fixed by a second pass.
This is work in progress.
This was causing blender to segfault.
We now add create a new collection and link to the layer before adding
the new object
(also included unittests, and requires updated lib/tests)
This adds an option to force fields of type "Force", which enables the
simulation of gravitational behavior (dist^-2 falloff).
Patch by @AndreasE
Reviewers: #physics, LucaRood, mont29
Reviewed By: #physics, LucaRood, mont29
Tags: #physics
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2389
Note that since there is no (efficient) ways to get arrays of
MVert/MEdge/etc. out of a BMesh, I refactored quite heavily internals of
BKE_mesh_render.
Now, when you do need acess to mesh data to generate cached batches, you
create an abstract struct from mesh (either Mesh or BMesh if available),
and then use advanced helpers to extract needed data, on a per-item
basis (no more handling of arrays of verts/edges/... in batches code).
This allows to:
* Avoid having to create arrays of BMesh elements.
* Take advantage of existing advanced BMesh topology and connectivity data.
Reviewers: dfelinto, fclem, merwin
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2521
So... Curve+shapekey was even more broken than it looked, this report was
actually a nice crasher (immediate crash in an ASAN build when trying to
edit a curve shapekey with some viewport rendering enabled).
There were actually two different issues here.
I) The less critical: rB6f1493f68fe was not fully fixing issues from
T50614. More specifically, if you updated obdata from editnurb
*without* freeing editnurb afterwards, you had a 'restored' (to
original curve) editnurb, without the edited shapekey modifications
anymore. This was fixed by tweaking again `calc_shapeKeys()` behavior in
`ED_curve_editnurb_load()`.
II) The crasher: in `ED_curve_editnurb_make()`, the call to
`init_editNurb_keyIndex()` was directly storing pointers of obdata
nurbs. Since those get freed every time `ED_curve_editnurb_load()` is
executed, it easily ended up being pointers to freed memory. This was
fixed by copying those data, which implied more complex handling code
for editnurbs->keyindex, and some reshuffling of a few functions to
avoid duplicating things between editor's editcurve.c and BKE's curve.c
Note that the separation of functions between editors and BKE area for
curve could use a serious update, it's currently messy to say the least.
Then again, that area is due to rework since a long time now... :/
Finally, aligned 'for_render' curve evaluation to mesh one - now
editing a shapekey will show in rendered viewports, if it does have some
weight (exactly as with shapekeys of meshes).
This adds initial support for reordering collections from the Outliner
using drag & drop.
Although drag & drop support is limited to collections for now, this
lays most foundations for general drag & drop reordering support in the
Outliner. There are some design questions to be answered though:
* Would reordering of other data types (like objects) be a purely visual change or would it affect the order in which they are stored? (Would that make a difference for the user?)
* Should/can we allow mixing of different data types? (e.g. mixing render layers with objects)
* How could we realize this technically?
Notes:
* "Sort Alphabetically" has to be disabled to use this ("View" menu).
* Reordering only works with collections on the same hierarchy level.
* Added some visual feedback that should work quite well, it's by far not a final design though: {F493806}
* Modified collection orders are stored in .blends.
* Reordering can be undone.
* Did minor cleanups here and there.
This should give the overall direction to whom wants to finish it.
- Renamed EDIT mode engine to EDIT_MESH mode engine
- Introduce EDIT_ARMATURE mode engine
- Started to port legacy drawarmature.c to draw_armature.c
New logic of split_faces was leaving mesh in a proper state
from Blender's point of view, but Cycles wanted loop normals
to be "flushed" to vertex normals.
Now we do such a flush from Cycles side again, so we don't
leave bad meshes behind.
Thanks Bastien for assistance here!
Finding which loop should share its vertex with which others is not easy
with regular Mesh data (mostly due to lack of advanced topology info, as
opposed with BMesh case).
Custom loop normals computing already does that - and can return 'loop
normal spaces', which among other things contain definitions of 'smooth
fans' of loops around vertices.
Using those makes it easy to find vertices (and then edges) that needs
splitting.
This commit also adds support of non-autosmooth meshes, where we want to
split out flat faces from smooth ones.
The issue seems to be caused by vertex normal being re-calculated
to something else than loop normal, which also caused wrong loop
normals after re-calculation.
For now issue is solved by preserving CD_NORMAL for loops after
split_faces() is finished, so render engine can access original
proper value.
test_evaluation_visibility_a failed before, but it is now fixed
test_evaluation_visibility_b passed before and was used as control to make sure it was not broken
The release of these arrays should be the programmer's discretion since these arrays can continue to be used.
Only the expanded functions `bvhtree_from_mesh_edges_ex` and `bvhtree_from_mesh_looptri_ex` are currently being used in blender (in mesh_remap.c), and from what I could to analyze, these changes can prevent a crash.
This is a more complex approach, which makes me really want to use
IDProperty instead (assuming we handle their merging nicely).
In fact I would expect this to happen in readfile.c, not during
doversion, but I can revert this later.
For now this allow for demo files saved with 2.8 to keep working even
after we add/remove engine settings properties.
The values are merged. There is no purge though, so
old CollectionEngineSettings and CollectionEngineProperty will live
forever (for the time being).
This prevents crashes when a file was saved with 2.8, but a new
engine settings property was created.
In those cases any previous collection settings are wiped out. We can do
an elegant merge soon.
