There was a differences between how Cycles and BI treats Normal shader:
- Different normal direction assumption
- Different policy about vector normalization
Previous idea of trying to use single function and flip the output if
needed becomes more tricky, so i've just added new GLSL function which
corresponds to how Cycles deals with the Normal shader.
This hack should not be needed here, quoting Sergey, the actual issue comes from BKE_object_handle_update_ex,
which is calling BKE_object_where_is_calc_ex when it shouldn't.
Propper fix is depsgraph refactor topic, though.
This was caused by some internal optimization which evaluated SSS with
size of zero as BSDF but used different ID so the evaluation result
didn't appear in regular diffuse pass.
This lead to situation when SSS data was nowhere stored if the
size was zero.
Now SSS with zero size and close-to-zero sizes will be handled in the
same way from the passes point of view.
Allocating the iterator from a BLI_memarena wasn't threadsafe.
Change the API to use stack memory for iterators.
Thanks to @mont29 for finding exact cause of the bug.
The was caused by numpy never unpackign because of no
dpependnecy of any targets from the unpacked numpy.
Tried making it so blender target dpeends on it, but for
some reason it didn't work. For now added dedicated target
for unpacked numpy. A bit dirty but much better than just
totally failing.
MSVC doesn't like caling macro argument f when using float values
in the macro, it simply replaces the f in the float value with the
argument..
CMake compilation still fails because of 77785ce708, numpy is never
getting unpacked.
Triangulate with beautify caused a bug when there were existing edges
could make the bmesh-operator return an invalid face-map.
Now the beauty is calculated on the 2d-tri's resulting from polyfill,
its simpler and faster.
Edgehash was missing removal functions (remove, popkey, clear),
since it wasn't needed so far, but is based on same code as ghash which has them.
also add heap clear() method so we can reuse heaps.
(needed for upcoming fix).
note, this is for C++ code which expects a cast, (will be added later)
also add a macro for nop-expressions (EXPR_NOP),
when we never want an expression to be evaluated, but it should still be valid.
* Rename "emboss" to "widget_emboss"
* Remove duplicated UI_GetThemeColor4ubv function
I made sure version bump and Save User Settings are working correctly ;P
It turns out that several important modelling addons depend on the assumption
that Grease Pencil data gets created on the active object instead of on scene
level. This commit adds a toggle for setting whether new Grease Pencil data
is created on scene or object level.
These work as follows:
* "Scene" = The behaviour originally introduced as part of the GPencil_EditStrokes
changes. New strokes are added to the scene instead of the active object, making
it easier to manage things when working with Grease Pencil in general.
* "Object" = The previous behaviour (from 2.50 to 2.72), where new strokes are added
to the active object. This is now being reintroduced to soften the transition
for addons out there which have been doing this in a lazy/lax way so far.
Now, what may be slightly confusing are the "fallback" measures in place:
* "Scene" - To ensure that loading old files goes ok without needing a version patch,
if the active object has GPencil data, that will be used in place of the scene's
own GPencil data.
* "Object" - If there was no active object at the time of creating strokes
(for instance, if you delete the active object immediately before drawing),
GPencil data gets attached to the current scene instead.
Since some tweaks may still be needed here, I've decided to bump the subversion
number so that we have a reference point when doing version patches.
Original patch by @random (D765) with some minor work done by @campbell
and me.
At this place, I'd like call out a number of people who were involved and
deserve a big "Thank you!":
* At the first place @randon who developed and submitted the patch
* The Blendercn community which helped a lot with testing - espacially
* @yuzukyo, @leon_cheung and @kjym3
* @campbellbarton, @mont29 and @sergey for their help and advises during
* review
* @ton who realized the importance of this early on and asked me for
* reviewing
We are still not finished, as this is only the first part of the
implementaion, but there's more to come!
SpaceMouse Wireless
SpaceMouse Pro Wireless
Device info is from user reports. I don’t yet have the new devices, so
these are untested but likely to work :D
