A new checkbox "High quality" is provided in camera settings to enable
this. This creates a depth of field that is much closer to the rendered
result and even supports aperture blades in the effect, but it's more
expensive too. There are optimizations to do here since the technique is
very fill rate heavy.
People, be careful, this -can- lock up your screen if depth of field
blurring is too extreme.
Technical details:
This uses geometry shaders + instancing and is an adaptation of
techniques gathered from
http://bartwronski.com/2014/04/07/bokeh-depth-of-field-going-insane-http://advances.realtimerendering.com/s2011/SousaSchulzKazyan%20-
%20in%20Real-Time%20Rendering%20Course).ppt
TODOs:
* Support dithering to minimize banding.
* Optimize fill rate in geometry shader.
We might remove this again in the future, but for testing purposes
during the release cycle, this will be useful.
The setting defaults to QBVH, and can be found in the Performance panel.
* Alpha Property was removed (Fix T42690)
* Some tweaks to make the panel look better again.
* Use abreviated form "Multiple Importance" everywhere, for consistency.
It is per-material setting which could be found under the Volume settings
in the material and world context buttons.
There could still be some code-wise improvements, like using variable-size
macro for interp3d instead of having interp3d_ex to which you can pass the
interpolation method.
Instead of having a label which basically duplicated the information
about experimental feature set being used (which had a bug because
it claimed experimental GPU kernel is used even if compute device is
CPU btw) now we've got an enum item icon.
So once you switched to experimental feature set you'll see an
exclamation mark icon in the enum, so you know something might be
unstable or slow.
Thanks for Aldo Zang for the help with the fix for the panorama/fisheye
depth of field calculation and the overall math.
Reviewed By: sergey, dingto
Subscribers: juicyfruit, gregzaal, #cycles, dingto, matray
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D753
Now we build 2 .cubins per architecture (e.g. kernel_sm_21.cubin, kernel_experimental_sm_21.cubin).
The experimental kernel can be used by switching to the Experimental Feature Set: http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Doc:2.6/Manual/Render/Cycles/Experimental_Features
This enables Subsurface Scattering and Correlated Multi Jitter Sampling on GPU, while keeping the stability and performance of the regular kernel.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D762
Patch by Sergey and myself.
Developer / Builder Note:
CUDA Toolkit 6.5 is highly recommended for this, also note that building the experimental kernel requires a lot of system memory (~7-8GB).
It can be helpful in some cases and it works properly, so no need to hide it behind the experimental flag anymore. It's only enabled for the CPU though.
Operators' poll func might be called from anywhere in Blender, so they should
not make any assumption about available context. material, lamp and world
are specific to context from Properties space...
* Put Normal Settings beneath the other ones, wild button jumping should be avoided.
* Remove Cage prefix for Object and Extrusion, it's clear from the button placement, the former UI was too squeezed...
This gives you "Multiple Importance", "Distance" and "Equiangular" choices.
What multiple importance sampling does is make things more robust to certain
types of noise at the cost of a bit more noise in cases where the individual
strategies are always better.
So if you've got a pretty dense volume that's lit from far away then distance
sampling is usually more efficient. If you've got a light inside or near the
volume then equiangular sampling is better. If you have a combination of both,
then the multiple importance sampling will be better.
Suggestion by Andy Davies (metalliandy) to conform with industry standard (custom cage is something else apparently)
Note: this is the last bake related commit I plan for 2.71/rc (unless
everyone agrees that we could squeeze in D546 - custom UVs, which would
be really nice to add for 2.71 scripters)
Note 2: I'll update the wiki docs shortly
There is a new option to select whether you want to use cage or not.
When not using cage the results will be more similar with Blender
Internal, where the inwards rays (trying to hit the highpoly objects)
don't always come from smooth normals. So if the active object has sharp
edges and an EdgeSplit modifier you get bad corners.
This is useful, however, to bake to planes without the need of adding
extra loops around the edges.
When cage is "on" the user can decide on setting a cage extrusion or to
pick a Custom Cage object. The cage extrusion option works in a
duplicated copy of the active object with EdgeSplit modifiers removed to
inforce smooth normals. The custom cage option takes an object with the
same number of faces as the active object (and the same face ordering).
The custom cage now controls the direction and the origin of the
rays casted to the highpoly objects. The direction is a ray from the
point in the cage mesh to the equivalent point to the base mesh. That
means the face normals are entirely ignored when using a cage object.
For developers:
When using an object cage the ray is calculated from the cage mesh to
the base mesh. It uses the barycentric coordinate from the base mesh UV,
so we expect both meshes to have the same primitive ids (which won't be
the case if the cage gets edited in a destructive way).
That fixes T40023 (giving the expected result when 'use_cage' is false).
Thanks for Andy Davies (metalliandy) for the consulting with normal
baking workflow and extensive testing. His 'stress-test' file will be
added later to our svn tests folder. (The file itself is not public yet
since he still has to add testing notes to it).
Many thanks for the reviewers.
More on cages:
http://wiki.polycount.com/NormalMap/#Working_with_Cages
Reviewers: campbellbarton, sergey
CC: adriano, metalliandy, brecht, malkavian
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D547
Expand Cycles to use the new baking API in Blender.
It works on the selected object, and the panel can be accessed in the Render panel (similar to where it is for the Blender Internal).
It bakes for the active texture of each material of the object. The active texture is currently defined as the active Image Texture node present in the material nodetree. If you don't want the baking to override an existent material, make sure the active Image Texture node is not connected to the nodetree. The active texture is also the texture shown in the viewport in the rendered mode.
Remember to save your images after the baking is complete.
Note: Bake currently only works in the CPU
Note: This is not supported by Cycles standalone because a lot of the work is done in Blender as part of the operator only, not the engine (Cycles).
Documentation:
http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Doc:2.6/Manual/Render/Cycles/Bake
Supported Passes:
-----------------
Data Passes
* Normal
* UV
* Diffuse/Glossy/Transmission/Subsurface/Emit Color
Light Passes
* AO
* Combined
* Shadow
* Diffuse/Glossy/Transmission/Subsurface/Emit Direct/Indirect
* Environment
Review: D421
Reviewed by: Campbell Barton, Brecht van Lommel, Sergey Sharybin, Thomas Dinge
Original design by Brecht van Lommel.
The entire commit history can be found on the branch: bake-cycles
Notes:
* The motion steps only affect deformation motion blur.
* The actual number of steps is 2^(steps - 1). This avoids having to sample at
many different times for object with more/fewer steps, now the times overlap.
* Deformation motion blur is enabled by default in existing files that have
motion blur enabled. If the object is not deforming, this will be detected at
export time, so raytracing performance will not be affected.
Part of the code is from the summer of code project by Gavin Howard.
This adds a new option "Sample All Lights" to the Sampling panel in Cycles (Branched Path). When enabled, Cycles will sample all the lights in the scene for the indirect samples, instead of randomly picking one. This is already happening for direct samples, now you can optionally enable it for indirect.
Example file and renders:
Blend file: http://www.pasteall.org/blend/27411
Random: http://www.pasteall.org/pic/show.php?id=68033
All: http://www.pasteall.org/pic/show.php?id=68034
Sampling all lights is a bit slower, but there is less variance, so it should help in situations with many lights.
Patch by myself with some tweaks by Brecht.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D391
