Object Info node can be useful to give some variation to a single material assigned to multiple instances. This patch adds support for Viewport and BI.
{F499530}
Example: {F499528}
Reviewers: merwin, brecht, dfelinto
Reviewed By: brecht
Subscribers: duarteframos, fclem, homyachetser, Evgeny_Rodygin, AlexKowel, yurikovelenov
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2425
We can not re-use anything for such pools, because we will know nothing about whether
the main thread is sleeping or not. So we identify such threads as 0, but we don't
use main thread's TLS.
This fixes dead-locks and crashes reported by Luca when doing playblasts.
Utility to get a file/dir in the path by index,
supporting negative indices to start from the end of the path.
Without this it wasn't straightforward to get
the a files parent directory name from a filepath.
Suspended pools allows to push huge amount of initial tasks
without any threading synchronization and hence overhead.
This gives ~50% speedup of cached rigid body with file from
T50027 and seems to have no negative affect in other scenes
here.
The idea is to allow some amount of tasks to be pushed from working
thread to it's local queue, so we can acquire some work without doing
whole mutex lock.
This should allow us to remove some hacks from depsgraph which was
added there to keep threads alive.
This allows us to avoid TLS stored in pool which gives us advantage of
using pre-allocated tasks pool for the pools created from non-main thread.
Even on systems with slow pthread TLS it should not be a problem because
we access it once at a pool construction time. If we want to use this more
often (for example, to get rid of push_from_thread) we'll have to do much
more accurate benchmark.
Basically move all thread-specific data (currently it's only task
memory pool) from a dedicated array of taskScheduler to TaskThread.
This way we can add more thread-specific data in the future with
less of a hassle.
This feature was adding extra complexity to task scheduling
which required yet extra variables to be worried about to be
modified in atomic manner, which resulted in following issues:
- More complex code to maintain, which increases risks of
something going wrong when we modify the code.
- Extra barriers and/or locks during task scheduling, which
causes extra threading overhead.
- Unable to use some other implementation (such as TBB) even for
the comparison tests.
Notes about other changes.
There are two places where we really had to use that limit.
One of them is the single threaded dependency graph. This will
now construct a single-threaded scheduler at evaluation time.
This shouldn't be a problem because it only happens when using
debugging command line arguments and the code simply don't
run in regular Blender operation.
The code seems a bit duplicated here across old and new
depsgraph, but think it's OK since the old depsgraph is already
gone in 2.8 branch and i don't see where else we might want
to use such a single-threaded scheduler.
When/if we'll want to do so, we can move it to a centralized
single-threaded scheduler in threads.c.
OpenGL render was a bit more tricky to port, but basically we
are using conditional variables to wait background thread to
do all the job.
Comments said that function was supposed to 'stop worker threads', but
it absolutely did not do anything like that, was merely wiping out TODO
queue of tasks from given pool (kind of subset of what
`BLI_task_pool_cancel()` does).
Misleading, and currently useless, we can always add it back if we need
it some day, but for now we try to simplify that area.
Freeing pool was calling `BLI_task_pool_stop()`, which only clears
pool's tasks that are in TODO queue, whithout ensuring no more tasks
from that pool are being processed in worker threads.
This could lead to use-after-free random (and seldom) crashes.
Now use instead `BLI_task_pool_cancel()`, which does waits for all tasks
being processed to finish, before returning.
Not really happy of per-pool threads limit, need to find better
approach to that. But at least it's possible to get rid of half
of the nastyness here by removing getter which was only used in
an assert statement.
That piece of code was already well-tested and this code becomes
obsolete in the new depsgraph and does no longer exists in blender
2.8 branch.
This was only used for progress report, and it's wrong because:
- Pool might in theory be re-used by different tasks
- We should not make any decision based on scheduling stats
Proper way is to take care of progress by the task itself.
