This included is needed for the `ATTR_NONNULL` macro used in the header.
As found in a recent c --> c++ if the includes get ordered in a different order
this could result in an error.
Re commits rBc20098e6ec6adee874a12e510aa4a56d89f92838
This reverts to following commits:
* rB5cad004d716da02f511bd34983ac7da820308676
* rB97e3a2d935ba9b21b127eda7ca104d4bcf4e48bd
* rBf60b95b5320f8d6abe6a629fe8fc4f1b94d0d91c
* rB0bd3cad04edf4bf9b9d3b1353f955534aa5e6740
* rBf72cc47d8edf849af98e196f721022bacf86a5e7
* rB3f7014ecc9d523997062eadd62888af5fc70a2b6
* rB0578921063fbb081239439062215f2538a31af4b
* rBc20098e6ec6adee874a12e510aa4a56d89f92838
* rBd5efda72f501ad95679d7ac554086a1fb18c1ac0
The original move to c++ that the other commits depended upon had some issues
that should be fixed before committing it again. The issues were reported in
T93797, T93809 and T93798.
We should also find a better rule for not using c-style casts going forward,
although that wouldn't have been reason enough to revert the commits.
Introducing something like a `MEM_new<T>` and `MEM_delete<T>`
function might help with the the most common case of casting the return
type of `MEM_malloc`.
Going forward, I recommend first committing the changes that don't
require converting files to c++. Then convert the shading node files
in smaller chunks. Especially don't mix fairly low risk changes like
moving some simple nodes, with higher risk changes.
