NodeWrangler: Fix #104598 Added SimNodes to reset ignore list #104599
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Blender Cloud
Interest
Collada
Interest
Core
Interest
Documentation
Interest
Eevee & Viewport
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
Import and Export
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds, Tests & Devices
Interest
Python API
Interest
Rendering & Cycles
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Translations
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Module
Add-ons (BF-Blender)
Module
Add-ons (Community)
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: blender/blender-addons#104599
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "F_Scociety/blender-addons:nw_multinode_resetfix"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Then running the RESET operator from node wrangler while selecting one of the simulation nodes it would raise a error.
This adds both simulation nodes to the Ignore list, because the don't have any values connected.
For the future this could maybe become a problem, especially with different multi node nodes.
But currently I think there is no way for a python script to generally determine, if both nodes are part of a multi node setup.
The "Sim Input Node" has a "Paired_Output" attribute pointing to the "Sim Output Node", but the "Sim Output Node" doesn't have a reference to the "Sim Input Node".
This is a "Fix" for #104598
Hi, thanks for the PR. Looks correct to me.
@JacquesLucke , can you check too?
Thanks!