Add note clarifying behavior object motion blur #104956
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
Meta
Good First Issue
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
Eevee & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds, Tests & Devices
Module
Python API
Module
Rendering & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Information from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: blender/blender-manual#104956
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "iss/blender-manual:mb"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Ref: blender/blender#128697
I'm not sure that is the way to word it. Something like this reads easier: Disabled motion blur for an object only applies to that object movement.
Movement does not seem to be the correct word, though: intuitively, movement does not include scale, but animated scale will cause motion blur as well.
Explicit mention of camera motion could work as an example, but there are more cases when camera might cause motion blur: for example, animated field of view.
Also feels a bit strange to have this clarification for the relative behavior of camera and object, but not objects parented to a moving parent with motion blur disabled.
I guess motion should be more general. It's in the name after all...
Ok, I will mention these cases as example.
Not sure about this case, if object A is parented to object B, only the one with motion blur enabled is blurred.
The updated wording seems better.
I'd leave the final review to Aaron, and poke Cycles if they have some strong recommendations.
Adding a clarification sound fine to me.
For the wording, I guess the first statement is true whether or not the option is disabled, so we don't need to say "disabled motion blur". I could suggest something like
"This option only applies to the motion of the object itself. Disabling it does not affect motion blur from other sources, such as camera motion or animated focal length.”
Sounds good to me, updated the note with this wording.