USD IO: Validate data in the operator, before starting background job. #105404

Open
opened 2023-03-03 15:41:12 +01:00 by Bastien Montagne · 10 comments

While the crash revealed by #105160 has now been fixed (d66672e17a), don't think USD I/O operators should start the background job at all when obviously wrong data has been selected/passed as parameter. It's not really good behavior for the IO operator to return "Success" after starting a background job that will immediately fail.

Not all errors can be caught at that level of course, but things like not passing an a priori valid filepath to the import operator can be checked by the operator code itself, and immediately return CANCELLED status.

Note: Dev who intends to work on this task should first do some research over USD file specs to identify what can be easily checked at the operator level, and what should be left to actual USD loading code to error on.
Typically, invalid inputs that can be selected from the USD import file browser UI should be checked by the operator code, or even fully prevented.
Some may be prevented by proper setting of the FileBrowser options, e.g. if selecting a directory is never expected to be a valid USD import path, then the filebrowser settings should not allow a directory path to be selected, etc.

While the crash revealed by #105160 has now been fixed (d66672e17a), don't think USD I/O operators should start the background job at all when obviously wrong data has been selected/passed as parameter. It's not really good behavior for the IO operator to return "Success" after starting a background job that will immediately fail. Not all errors can be caught at that level of course, but things like not passing an *a priori* valid filepath to the import operator can be checked by the operator code itself, and immediately return `CANCELLED` status. > Note: Dev who intends to work on this task should first do some research over USD file specs to identify what can be easily checked at the operator level, and what should be left to actual USD loading code to error on. Typically, invalid inputs that can be selected from the USD import file browser UI should be checked by the operator code, or even fully prevented. Some may be prevented by proper setting of the FileBrowser options, e.g. if selecting a directory is never expected to be a valid USD import path, then the filebrowser settings should not allow a directory path to be selected, etc.
Bastien Montagne added this to the USD project 2023-03-03 15:41:14 +01:00
Contributor

hey @mont29 this issue is open right ? Could you please explain to me in more detail what needs to be done here?

hey @mont29 this issue is open right ? Could you please explain to me in more detail what needs to be done here?
Author
Owner

Yes it is. Essentially, code in exec callback of WM_OT_usd_import should check that the selected path is a priori a valid candidate for USD import.

Yes it is. Essentially, code in `exec` callback of `WM_OT_usd_import` should check that the selected path is *a priori* a valid candidate for USD import.

Hey @mont29, so I have been going through the source code and I just wanted to confirm if the bug lies in this piece of code.

char filename[FILE_MAX];
RNA_string_get(op->ptr, "filepath", filename);

image

This is in the /source/blender/editors/io/io_usd.c file.

Hey @mont29, so I have been going through the source code and I just wanted to confirm if the bug lies in this piece of code. ``` char filename[FILE_MAX]; RNA_string_get(op->ptr, "filepath", filename); ``` ![image](/attachments/38a684f9-41a2-4dd0-beca-261256f39775) This is in the /source/blender/editors/io/io_usd.c file.

I dove into the code of RNA_string_get(), and it calls another function RNA_property_string_get() which is where I feel a check for char *value is required?

I dove into the code of `RNA_string_get()`, and it calls another function `RNA_property_string_get()` which is where I feel a check for `char *value` is required?

I think you need to do an extra check after these two lines. It checks for "No filename given" but it doesn't check for "Invalid filename".

I think you need to do an extra check after these two lines. It checks for "No filename given" but it doesn't check for "Invalid filename".

In my opinion this is not necessary, what is the benefit of validating data in two places? Performance is not a concern here, and duplicated validation code means possibility of things to go out of sync.

In my opinion this is not necessary, what is the benefit of validating data in two places? Performance is not a concern here, and duplicated validation code means possibility of things to go out of sync.

If this is marked as a good first issue it should also which conditions you expect this to check, because even for me it's not clear what the intent is here. A valid file path can mean many things, including file existence, file/directory, read permissions, extensions, etc.

If this is marked as a good first issue it should also which conditions you expect this to check, because even for me it's not clear what the intent is here. A valid file path can mean many things, including file existence, file/directory, read permissions, extensions, etc.

@brecht yeah it was confusing, so I just assumed .usd files would be the right ones and continued. But I should've done proper research, my bad.
As far as the necessity of this issue goes, it sure helped me gain experience with submitting PRs for blender. Messed up a lot, learnt a lot. All in all, good practice.

@brecht yeah it was confusing, so I just assumed .usd files would be the right ones and continued. But I should've done proper research, my bad. As far as the necessity of this issue goes, it sure helped me gain experience with submitting PRs for blender. Messed up a lot, learnt a lot. All in all, good practice.

hey @mont29 I want to know is this issue still open? If yes, can you explain me which parameters to check for a valid filename?

hey @mont29 I want to know is this issue still open? If yes, can you explain me which parameters to check for a valid filename?
Bastien Montagne removed the
Meta
Good First Issue
label 2023-03-29 11:12:13 +02:00
Author
Owner

Removing the good first issue tag since there is clearly no common understanding of its meaning.

Updated task with some more context and expectations info.

Removing the good first issue tag since there is clearly no common understanding of its meaning. Updated task with some more context and expectations info.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
6 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#105404
No description provided.