Potential candidates for corrective releases #83216

New Issue

NOTE: Checked items have already been merged into blender-v2.91-release branch. When adding new items make sure it isn't checked so we know what still needs to be done

List with fixes that could be in 2.91.1

*Note, 2.91.1 was skipped in favour of 2.91.2 .//

Fixes that could be in 2.91.2

Fixes that could be in 2.91.3

NOTE: Checked items have already been merged into `blender-v2.91-release` branch. When adding new items make sure it isn't checked so we know what still needs to be done List with fixes that could be in 2.91.1 - [x] *[Note, 2.91.1 was skipped in favour of 2.91.2 ](https:*lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-committers/2021-January/050870.html).// Fixes that could be in 2.91.2 - [x] 20f8130d6f - [x] 898231fdbc - [x] 44f5d99cbf - [x] f9e994d0f4 - [x] e4e7dfc1d8 - [x] c576d65c2f - [x] f3b08af24c - [x] b9eb592133 - [x] 561d9169fe - [x] 97651f428b - [x] d1cedf53fa - [x] c2a01a6c11 - [x] 3d0b65f89b - [x] 2b9eb5eee5 - [x] e035d7301c - [x] cf2ebaf27c - [x] ebd8a703cc - [x] 8d590e4b86 - [x] 7d25139eaf - [x] 4b56c18290 - [x] 967cf303f3 - [x] f0071dfa10 - [x] 691c021679 - [x] f35a38fba7 - [x] 15bb8f9f93 - [x] 2d3f96cace - [x] 08e44b5e3e - [x] d11a87b88c - [x] a3fcbb54f4 - [x] cb2517016b - [x] 9fb32b2b29 - [x] 4c44a5309c - [x] c716b9862a - [x] 5d99199880 - [x] 55c56f1ffb - [x] abbc43e4e4 - [x] ffb6648a97 - [x] 84451f89f5 Fixes that could be in 2.91.3 - [ ] e25f7e33ff - [ ] e9cd3d50a7 - [ ] acc662ea5a - [ ] 216ebe0b73 - [ ] 419c67c851

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Confirmed'

Added subscriber: @dfelinto

Added subscriber: @Harvester

Added subscriber: @Slowwkidd

Added subscriber: @EAW

Added subscriber: @kevindietrich

84451f89f5 should also be considered for backport (discussed here 5c01ecd2bf)

84451f89f5 should also be considered for backport (discussed here 5c01ecd2bf)

Added subscriber: @mano-wii

I am surprised that release 2.91 apparently does not have 20f8130d6f (resulting in #83654)
That is a relatively old commit.

In that case, it would be good to check and backport 20f8130d6f, 898231fdbc

I am surprised that release 2.91 apparently does not have 20f8130d6f (resulting in #83654) That is a relatively old commit. In that case, it would be good to check and backport 20f8130d6f, 898231fdbc

Added subscriber: @mont29

In #83216#1074178, @mano-wii wrote:
I am surprised that release 2.91 apparently does not have 20f8130d6f (resulting in #83654)
That is a relatively old commit.

In that case, it would be good to check and backport 20f8130d6f, 898231fdbc

it's developer's responsibility to commit their fix in release branch if/when they think it is safe enough to do so, at least in bcon3 (in bcon4 all commits to release branch must be reviewed and approved by a core team member first).

But we do not do cherry-picking from master into release branch typically. See https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Process/Release_Cycle

> In #83216#1074178, @mano-wii wrote: > I am surprised that release 2.91 apparently does not have 20f8130d6f (resulting in #83654) > That is a relatively old commit. > > In that case, it would be good to check and backport 20f8130d6f, 898231fdbc it's developer's responsibility to commit their fix in release branch if/when they think it is safe enough to do so, at least in bcon3 (in bcon4 all commits to release branch must be reviewed and approved by a core team member first). But we do not do cherry-picking from master into release branch typically. See https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Process/Release_Cycle

And also, forgot that link: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Process/Using_Stabilizing_Branch

Added subscriber: @Raimund58

I would like to propose {https://developer.blender.org/rB87b19b3aba0c8535d48ad07e2dae2e09373c913a} being back ported because otherwise Cycles is broken for users with special characters in their path to the BLENDER_USER_CONFIG.

Removed subscriber: @Slowwkidd

Added subscriber: @StephenLeger

Hi could you consider backport of blender/blender-addons@8ca8233069

Added subscriber: @Jeroen-Bakker

How is it that the versioning has switched directly to 2.91.2? This version numbering is both in the file names (https://download.blender.org/release/Blender2.91/) and in Blender itself (as shown in the splash screen). Probably, this was intentional but, just in case, I let you notice it. Thanks.

Added subscriber: @Leroy-Xie

Don't have #83027...

@Leroy-Xie This list is for developers to include commits. Not to raise the awareness or priorities of reported (unfixed) issues.

Added subscriber: @frispete

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Resolved'

Closing ticket as there won't be any corrective releases anymore for 2.91. See #85958 (Potential candidates for corrective releases) for 2.92

Download

What's New

Blender Studio

Manual

Developers Blog

Documentation

Benchmark

Blender Conference

Development Fund

One-time Donations

Potential candidates for corrective releases #83216