UI: Improve multi OS display #205
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Reviewed
Confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
Reviewed
Invalid
Reviewed
Won't Fix
Status
Abandoned
Status
Blocked
Status
Need More Info
Type
Breaking
Type
Documentation
Type
Enhancement
Type
Feature
Type
Report
Type
Security
Type
Suggestion
Type
Testing
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: infrastructure/extensions-website#205
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "ui/multi-os"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
This PR improves UI display of extensions with multiple platform variants.
The following items are work in progress, and will be added later:
@dfelinto about grouping architectures per OS in the "supported platforms" list
once we get extensions for windows-arm64, it would make sense to do grouping for windows, not only for macOS
to implement this with the current data model, it will be easier if we had a more specific platform.name for windows-x64, then we could rely on the methods
name_first_word
andname_rest
for grouping.the problem is that currently
name_rest
for windows-x64 is empty, so it would look weird if we join an empty string and the "Arm" part of windows-arm64to solve this we could just update the name field for windows-x64 to something other than "Windows", e.g. "Windows x64", what do you think?