Full-text search using postgresql #162
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Reviewed
Confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
Reviewed
Invalid
Reviewed
Won't Fix
Status
Abandoned
Status
Blocked
Status
Need More Info
Type
Breaking
Type
Documentation
Type
Enhancement
Type
Feature
Type
Report
Type
Security
Type
Suggestion
Type
Testing
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: infrastructure/extensions-website#162
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "fts"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
See #127: current search is too naive to be useful.
It does a simple substring match and doesn't do any ranking.
This is an attempt at making search more useful without introducing
more components into the project's infrastructure.
This introduces a discrepancy between sqlite and postgresql support:
sqlite keeps the old unsatisfying implementation.
We don't have any metrics for search quality, but we can reconstruct
search behavior from access logs: we see search terms and page
response size, that can indicate if we found any results.
If further improvements to search are required, we probably should
consider using meilisearch (or alternatives) for indexing.
LGTM 🚢