Seems you could still add a reply to blender/blender#105283, confirm and raise its priority
Hello. Please follow the report template https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Process/Bug_Reports
@Kent-Davis No, I do not have it. Basically, the hope is that someone with this pc will be able to check it.
Rather, what I mean is that usually blender implies that content created for sale can be distributed for free, since this uses blender resources But I'm not sure what assets would then be, a tool…
I hope the description does not suffer from the excessive complexity of the situation described there. It took me a long time to figure it out myself.
Also, the build bot seems to suffer from…
If the author indicates in the asset that this asset is obliged to be sold and it is forbidden to distribute it for free, will this be somehow taken into account?
This seems to be used everywhere, for asking for multiple lazy inputs (in switch node for example).
Just do not indicate constraint in the type (like ListBase *lb = nullptr;)?
Since this does not work in C ++ file, it seems you mean not to make a constant input in functions. But this still…
That is, can say this: That commit was correct, but somewhere in history this code began to work differently and the culprit was someone else? (Looking for the culprit to confirm this. But given…