Hi!
Thank you for reporting the problem. I confirm I can reproduce the issue.
The file export.py seems to be in the wrong directory. This should easy to fix.
I think Weight by Face Area or Weight Normals by Face Area would be more accurate. However, this is a complex concept. It will always be hard to describe it succinctly, and still inform enough…
Enabling the option is the better way IMO.
Just don't forget to remove the row with the property in ui.py (line 112) to get rid of the rna_uiItemR error on the console.
I've just found the commit. I think I understand the intention. However, if the property is removed from the UI in the Sidebar, the user risks never seeing it, unless they open up the `Adjust…
Hi!
The objects in your file don't seem to have any faces. So there are no faces to be marked as zero area faces.
Moreover, to be manifold, an edge has to be part of exactly two faces. An…
I understand that the new behavior is consistent with how mirroring works in Blender. And if the user applies the transformation, there is no simple solution.
However, flipping the normals has…
I think manifold-ness is in general a useful test for 3d printing. While the case with zero-area holes would probably print alright, larger holes would almost certainly require repairing, and the…
Hi!
I think this is intended behavior, not a bug. To be manifold, it is necessary for an edge to be part of exactly two faces. The operations you've made create three edges that have one face…
Hi!
I've tested your file with the newest 4.1 version and Blender did not crash. However, the computation took considerable time, and the interface does not respond during this period, as is…
348d29191b
Rework the Bone -> Viewport Display page, mainly removing a note that no longer applies #104405