Unsure why gitea didnt link the related PR automatically, but it's here: #117316
That seems like it would add more logic onto the python side of things to handle this instead of using the pattern that already exists for the UnifiedPaintSettings, and I think that having the…
Will do, I was on the fence about adding them, but I decided to keep it in the PR when submitting just to err on the side of more rather than less.
Just to be clear - do you mean the general restructuring that happened in the cache_init function, or just the added comments?
Oh, makes sense - I got a bit confused with seeing some of the previous changes in this file that do both. I assumed that it was a prerequisite to have both layers of checks.
Planning on picking up this work at some point soon since this seems to have stalled out in the last year.
Tagging @Sergey @HooglyBoogly and @JulienKaspar as specific in the original issue for review.
