These often want to store a non-const reference to its owner, i.e. the
object that created them. I don't really like removing const here, but
it makes sense to enable this use case.
Previously UI view items would support custom drop controllers (so they
could react to data being dragged over them and dropped). This is now
more generalized so the views themselves can do this as well.
Main changes:
- Support calculating a bounding box for the view, so this can be used
for recognizing mouse hovering.
- Rename "drop controller" to "drop target", this is more clear, less
abstract naming.
- Generalize drop controllers/targets. There is a new
`ui::DropTargetInterface` now.
- Add support for drop targets in the `ui::AbstractView` base class, so
custom views can use this.
Pull Request: blender/blender#105963
Various UI code would store the `AssetHandle` in a way that turns out to
be unsafe. The file-data is part of the file browser caching system that
releases file-data when a certain maximum of items is in the cache. So
even while just iterating over the assets, earlier iterated asset
handles may become invalid. Now asset handles are really treated as
volatile, short lived objects.
For the asset-view, the fix was more involved. There we need an RNA
collection of asset-handles, because the UI list code requires that. So
we create a dummy collection and get the asset handles as needed by
index. This again meant that I had to keep the index of the collection
and the asset-list in sync, so all filtering had to be moved to the UI
list.
I tried duplicating the file-data out of the cache instead, but that
caused problems with managing the memory/ownership of the preview
images.
`AssetHandle` should be removed and replaced by `AssetRepresentation`,
but this would be an even more disruptive change (breaking API
compatibility too).
Fixes#104305, #105535.
Pull Request: #105773
Adds the possibility of having a little number on top of icons.
At the moment this is used for:
* Outliner
* Node Editor bread-crumb
* Node Group node header
For the outliner there is almost no functional change. It is mostly a refactor
to handle the indicators as part of the icon shader instead of the outliner
draw code. (note that this was already recently changed in a5d3b648e3).
The difference is that now we use rounded border rectangle instead of
circles, and we can go up to 999 elements.
So for the outliner this shows the number of collapsed elements of a
certain type (e.g., mesh objects inside a collapsed collection).
For the node editors is being used to show the use count for the data-block.
This is important for the node editor, so users know whether the node-group
they are editing (or are about to edit) is used elsewhere. This is
particularly important when the Node Options are hidden, which is the
default for node groups appended from the asset libraries.
---
Note: This can be easily enabled for ID templates which can then be part
of T84669. It just need to call UI_but_icon_indicator_number_set in the
function template_add_button_search_menu.
---
Special thanks Clément Foucault for the help figuring out the shader,
Julian Eisel for the help navigating the UI code, and Pablo Vazquez for
the collaboration in this design solution.
For images showing the result check the Differential Revision.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D16284
This refactors the geometry nodes evaluation system. No changes for the
user are expected. At a high level the goals are:
* Support using geometry nodes outside of the geometry nodes modifier.
* Support using the evaluator infrastructure for other purposes like field evaluation.
* Support more nodes, especially when many of them are disabled behind switch nodes.
* Support doing preprocessing on node groups.
For more details see T98492.
There are fairly detailed comments in the code, but here is a high level overview
for how it works now:
* There is a new "lazy-function" system. It is similar in spirit to the multi-function
system but with different goals. Instead of optimizing throughput for highly
parallelizable work, this system is designed to compute only the data that is actually
necessary. What data is necessary can be determined dynamically during evaluation.
Many lazy-functions can be composed in a graph to form a new lazy-function, which can
again be used in a graph etc.
* Each geometry node group is converted into a lazy-function graph prior to evaluation.
To evaluate geometry nodes, one then just has to evaluate that graph. Node groups are
no longer inlined into their parents.
Next steps for the evaluation system is to reduce the use of threads in some situations
to avoid overhead. Many small node groups don't benefit from multi-threading at all.
This is much easier to do now because not everything has to be inlined in one huge
node tree anymore.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D15914
Part of T98560.
See https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Source/Interface/Views
Adds all the basic functionality needed for grid views. They display
items in a grid of rows and columns, typically with a preview image and
a label underneath. Think of the main region in the Asset Browser.
Current features:
- Active item
- Notifier listening (also added this to the tree view)
- Performance: Skip adding buttons that are not scrolled into view
(solves performance problems for big asset libraries, for example).
- Custom item size
- Preview items (items that draw a preview with a label underneath)
- Margins between items scale so the entire region width is filled with
column, rather than leaving a big empty block at the right if there's
not enough space for another column (like the File and current Asset
Browser does it).
- "Data-View Item" theme colors. Not shown in the UI yet.
No user visible changes expected since the grid views aren't used for
anything yet.
This was developed as part of a rewrite of the Asset Browser UI
(`asset-browser-grid-view` branch), see T95653. There's no reason to
keep this part in a branch, continuing development in master makes
things easier.
Grid and tree views have a lot of very similar code, so I'm planning to
unify them to a degree. I kept things separate for the start to first
find out how much and what exactly makes sense to override.
Use a shorter/simpler license convention, stops the header taking so
much space.
Follow the SPDX license specification: https://spdx.org/licenses
- C/C++/objc/objc++
- Python
- Shell Scripts
- CMake, GNUmakefile
While most of the source tree has been included
- `./extern/` was left out.
- `./intern/cycles` & `./intern/atomic` are also excluded because they
use different header conventions.
doc/license/SPDX-license-identifiers.txt has been added to list SPDX all
used identifiers.
See P2788 for the script that automated these edits.
Reviewed By: brecht, mont29, sergey
Ref D14069
This patch upgrades node editor breadcrumbs to have slightly more
visual weight, to including the base path of object/modifier/world,
etc, have more visually pleasing spacing, and contain icons.
In the code, a generic "context path" is added to interface code.
The idea is that this could be used to draw other breadcrumbs in areas
like the property editor or the spreadsheet, and features could be added
to all of those areas at the same time.
Ideally we would be able to control the color of the breadcrumbs with a
specific theme color, but since they are drawn with the regular layout
system, that is not easily possible.
Thanks to @fabian_schempp for the original patch.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10413
This adds attribute search to the geometry nodes modifier
for the input and output attributes. The "New" search item
is only shown for the output attributes.
Some of the attribute search code is extracted to a new file
in the interface code, to avoid some code duplication.
The UI code required two fixes so that the search would work
for dynamic length strings (IDProperties do not have a fixed size).
Since this does changes to the UI layout of the modifier, I also
addressed T91485 here.
Differential Revisiion: https://developer.blender.org/D12788
This follows three main targets:
* Make creation of new tree UIs easy.
* Groundwork to generalize tree UIs (so e.g. Outliner, animation
channels, asset catalogs and spreadsheet data-sets don't have to
re-implement basic tree UI code) or even other data-view UIs.
* Better separate data and UI state. E.g. with this, tree-item selection
or the open/collapsed state can be stored on the UI level, rather than
in data. (Asset Catalogs need this, storing UI state info in them is
not an option.)
In addition, the design should be well testable and could even be
exposed to Python.
Note that things will likely change in master still. E.g. the actually
resulting UI isn't very nice visually yet.
The design is documented here:
https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Source/Interface/Views
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12573
